They should shoot to injure.

[Brasspen]

In the late 80's early 90's the police used to shoot criminals to injure them. To immobilize them. They then changed it so it was shoot to kill. They said the reason was it made it cheaper.

So what happens when they shoot to kill rather than injure? There is nothing to investigate. The person who was the cause of this shooter is hidden. This means people can convince other people to go on a shooting. Assassinations can be done and the person who is behind it will be hidden. When the gun man is dead, the police can use their poetry and make it look anyway they want.

Another reason they started shooting to kill, rather than injure is because of sport. The police just wanted to kill people.

 

[pinebeach]

In the late 80's early 90's the police used to shoot criminals to injure them. To immobilize them. They then changed it so it was shoot to kill. They said the reason was it made it cheaper.

So what happens when they shoot to kill rather than injure? There is nothing to investigate. The person who was the cause of this shooter is hidden. This means people can convince other people to go on a shooting. Assassinations can be done and the person who is behind it will be hidden. When the gun man is dead, the police can use their poetry and make it look anyway they want.

Another reason they started shooting to kill, rather than injure is because of sport. The police just wanted to kill people.

Do you have a blog? A facebook page perhaps? Other social media? I would be very careful about making such sweeping and inflamatory statements. You are clearly not thinking clearly to make that statement.

 

[Brasspen]

What did the police tell us when we asked them, when they made that decision?

Anyone can cause people to die in this country and get away with it, because the police always kill the gun man. It lets people do their assassination work without fear of getting caught. They get someone to kill a certain person for them, and then the police hide all the evidence. They don't want the gun man to live, because the gun man knows who said what to him in he's head. Sometime later that gun man might speak out.

 

[pinebeach]

What did the police tell us when we asked them, when they made that decision?

Anyone can cause people to die in this country and get away with it, because the police always kill the gun man. It lets people do their assassination work without fear of getting caught. They get someone to kill a certain person for them, and then the police hide all the evidence. They don't want the gun man to live, because the gun man knows who said what to him in he's head. Sometime later that gun man might speak out.

When you asked who about what? I don't read minds.

You cannot impose your thoughts on another and then say that is what the other person thinks. You seem to have things all sorted out to your own satisfaction so maybe we'll just leave it there. Although to what end, I can't say.

 

[Tall_Timbers]

In the late 80's early 90's the police used to shoot criminals to injure them. To immobilize them. They then changed it so it was shoot to kill. They said the reason was it made it cheaper.

So what happens when they shoot to kill rather than injure? There is nothing to investigate. The person who was the cause of this shooter is hidden. This means people can convince other people to go on a shooting. Assassinations can be done and the person who is behind it will be hidden. When the gun man is dead, the police can use their poetry and make it look anyway they want.

Another reason they started shooting to kill, rather than injure is because of sport. The police just wanted to kill people.

I was a police officer way back when. The above all appears to be balderdash and lies to me. The general rule for police has always been shoot to kill, if you have to shoot. There are very good reasons for that that I won't go in to.

 

[ZNP]

In the late 80's early 90's the police used to shoot criminals to injure them. To immobilize them. They then changed it so it was shoot to kill. They said the reason was it made it cheaper.

So what happens when they shoot to kill rather than injure? There is nothing to investigate. The person who was the cause of this shooter is hidden. This means people can convince other people to go on a shooting. Assassinations can be done and the person who is behind it will be hidden. When the gun man is dead, the police can use their poetry and make it look anyway they want.

Another reason they started shooting to kill, rather than injure is because of sport. The police just wanted to kill people.

Just when I thought a social credit score was a terrible thing you come and show me there is an exception to every rule.

 

[Brasspen]

And now with Islam and Muslim immigrants, there are plenty of ppl to make it happen.

 

[Brasspen]

You all mock me about it, because it not what you know already.

 

[Edward429451]

In the late 80's early 90's the police used to shoot criminals to injure them. To immobilize them. They then changed it so it was shoot to kill. They said the reason was it made it cheaper.

So what happens when they shoot to kill rather than injure? There is nothing to investigate. The person who was the cause of this shooter is hidden. This means people can convince other people to go on a shooting. Assassinations can be done and the person who is behind it will be hidden. When the gun man is dead, the police can use their poetry and make it look anyway they want.

Another reason they started shooting to kill, rather than injure is because of sport. The police just wanted to kill people.

They wont admit it. They will say, We don't shoot to kill, we shoot to stop them...

Ah the good ol' days eh? Yeah he expired at the scene. His 6 year old daughter made a furtive movement..No one in the car survived.

 

[Howdy]

What did the police tell us when we asked them, when they made that decision?

Anyone can cause people to die in this country and get away with it, because the police always kill the gun man. It lets people do their assassination work without fear of getting caught. They get someone to kill a certain person for them, and then the police hide all the evidence. They don't want the gun man to live, because the gun man knows who said what to him in he's head. Sometime later that gun man might speak out.

Well if you ever need help forget about calling 911.
Just handle it your self.
The police have never just shot wound. It is to dangerous. The bad guy shooting at them is shooting to kill and will continue to do so until he no longer can.
I know this for a fact because we have law enforcement members in our church.

 

[Howdy]

The best way to not get shot by the police is to do exactly what the say.

 

[Brasspen]

They can take the gun out of their hand with the marksman skill they have. They shoot into the deltoid at certain places, that prevent him from being able use he's arm. Not to mention the police have armor. They have such precise skill to never miss when killing him. But they telling me they can't disarm him?

With him dead, nobody will find out what was spoken into that man's ear, that made him do it. And nobody will find who spoke it. The person who caused him to do it, is free to do it with another. 'One afterrrr another.'

The police close the case saying, '...crazy man...' The real killer sits back laughing.

They need catch the master mind.

 

[Howdy]

They can take the gun out of their hand with the marksman skill they have. They shoot into the deltoid at certain places, that prevent him from being able use he's arm. Not to mention the police have armor. They have such precise skill to never miss when killing him. But they telling me they can't disarm him?

With him dead, nobody will find out what was spoken into that man's ear, that made him do it. And nobody will find who spoke it. The person who caused him to do it, is free to do it with another. 'One afterrrr another.'

The police close the case saying, '...crazy man...' The real killer sits back laughing.

You really do not know what you are talking about.
Oh! Oh! that person was killed just because he pointed a gun at the policeman!
He got what he asked for.
If a person comes at me or my family or an innocent person and he has a gun, I will kill him.
I do carry at all times.
I have won awards for marksmanship, but that was when I was calm, not in a situation where I was in danger.
Don't do stupid things and you have no worries.
Don't get a gun and push a policeman or any other person who may be armed to a place where they do not have to make a split second decision and you will have no problem.

 

[Brasspen]

There are some situations that it would permit it. Not for every single situation. Under the situation you talk about there is not enough time to assess the situation. but there are those situations that it can be done. Just not all of them.

One day soon we might have armor drones who design is to entrap the bad person. These drones would patrol and sit around places like a church, and when they see something they would, somehow snare the person. What do you think about this idea?

 

[Ouch]

In the late 80's early 90's the police used to shoot criminals to injure them. To immobilize them. They then changed it so it was shoot to kill. They said the reason was it made it cheaper.

So what happens when they shoot to kill rather than injure? There is nothing to investigate. The person who was the cause of this shooter is hidden. This means people can convince other people to go on a shooting. Assassinations can be done and the person who is behind it will be hidden. When the gun man is dead, the police can use their poetry and make it look anyway they want.

Another reason they started shooting to kill, rather than injure is because of sport. The police just wanted to kill people.

Do you really think every officer gets up in the morning and says who can I kill today!!!!

When someone is pointing a gun at an officer, your saying it's the officer should shoot to injure like it's all slow motoin.

It's not like a western movie, whey they are standing in front of each other I bet 100% of the time the one pointing the gun at the officer has him in there sights first without waring, BANG!!!

What happens when someone is shooting at the officer, are they trying to just injure him?

They are trained to use as much forces as nessary, when the threat in nutrulized they stand down.

Yep, just like every job, not everyone is perfect.

How about this, don't pull a gun on a officer and they will not pull one on you!

Have you spent time in jail, sounds like you're trying to protect the criminals.

 

[Brasspen]

I am saying the police need catch the master mind. The one who instigated the problem.
It's not mystery to me if the gunman will then get the death penalty after being judged.

 

[Howdy]

There are some situations that it would permit it. Not for every single situation. Under the situation you talk about there is not enough time to assess the situation. but there are those situations that it can be done. Just not all of them.

One day soon we might have armor drones who design is to entrap the bad person. These drones would patrol and sit around places like a church, and when they see something they would, somehow snare the person. What do you think about this idea?

Never happen.
You live in a what if world that just is not real.
If these people did not misbehave and act stupid, they would never have to worry about the police killing them.
They bring it on themselves by their actions.

I am saying the police need catch the master mind. The one who instigated the problem.
It's not mystery to me if the gunman will then get the death penalty after being judged.

No you are saying the police are the bad guys because they kill people pointing guns at them.
The masterminds have enough money to buy their freedom.

 

[Edward429451]

The best way to not get shot by the police is to do exactly what the say.

Wrong.

Psalm 91:1-5
1 He that dwelleth in the secret place of the most High shall abide under the shadow of the Almighty.

2 I will say of the Lord, He is my refuge and my fortress: my God; in him will I trust.

3 Surely he shall deliver thee from the snare of the fowler, and from the noisome pestilence.

4 He shall cover thee with his feathers, and under his wings shalt thou trust: his truth shall be thy shield and buckler.

5 Thou shalt not be afraid for the terror by night; nor for the arrow that flieth by day;...KJV

Back when that was written, guns did not exist yet, but make no mistake guns are arrows too. God certainly knows that so that it means.

Most of the time, cooperating with the police will you get you home again. But it's true that they get some yoyo cops who have attitudes and want to trample people's rights. There's right ways and wrong ways to stand up for your rights. You have to know what to say.

I think the statute of limitations is up on me lol. I have carried a concealed gun for about 40 years now. Never had a permit or a ccw license or even one of them sucky badges, lol. The Constitution doesn't allow me to carry a gun, I already had that right. The Constitution is a reference sheet for the Government so they can see at a glance what they can NOT do.

One time I was carrying my Colt 45 and a young cop pulled me over. And I was, open carry. He had me hand it to him and he put it on the roof, and then had me step out so I did. We was talking and he looked at my gun and I thought, here's where he wants to unload it, and I carry with one up the pipe. That's exactly what he wanted to do. He reached for it and I stopped. I said sir, if you are unfamiliar with those pistols, please just leave it in the holster and don't try to unload it. It's fully loaded.

And the Lord shined a nice light on Edward that day and the young cop actually listened to me and left it alone. I think he could tell that I am not a punk, lol. So praise the Lord.

No one needs a permit, that's stupid. All you need is a record with zero violence or punk type stuff. I've never been a punk, I just carry a 45 just in case. Havent shot anybody yet, Praise the Lord!

You know what I don't like? I don't like it that it is illegal to lie to a cop, and not illegal for a cop to lie to you! That aint right.

 

[ZNP]

You know what I don't like? I don't like it that it is illegal to lie to a cop, and not illegal for a cop to lie to you! That aint right.

You have the right to remain silent and you have the right to an attorney. If you do not exercise those rights then you are exercising your right to be stupid.

 

[Edward429451]

Do you really think every officer gets up in the morning and says who can I kill today!!!!

When someone is pointing a gun at an officer, your saying it's the officer should shoot to injure like it's all slow motoin.

It's not like a western movie, whey they are standing in front of each other I bet 100% of the time the one pointing the gun at the officer has him in there sights first without waring, BANG!!!

What happens when someone is shooting at the officer, are they trying to just injure him?

They are trained to use as much forces as nessary, when the threat in nutrulized they stand down.

Yep, just like every job, not everyone is perfect.

How about this, don't pull a gun on a officer and they will not pull one on you!

Have you spent time in jail, sounds like you're trying to protect the criminals.

Don't pull a gun on an officer and he wont pull one on me? Har de Har Har! I've never pulled a gun on a cop and I've had hundreds of police guns pointed at me. (I'm 63 lol). You see all of the cops they hire are sissy's. Officer safety. So they draw with no provocation and start reciting the scared cop mantra. No thank you.

It's a nice thought, but you is wrong! They'll point guns at you if you sneeze. That aine right I tell you! Get some boys in there that arent scared.