NEW CC Perspectives on Levels of Conspiracy & Corruption in 2020 Election, CV19 & DS Existence

[Solemateleft]

Hmmmm.... Things that make you go... Hmmmm...
Steven Frattini
THEY ALL SLEEP WITH WHITE PEOPLE.
The loudest voices warning people to “fear” the white man are all married to white people
So ironic

 

[Solemateleft]

Rep. James Comer just dropped the hammer on the Clintons!…
“Facing contempt of Congress, the Clintons’ lawyers made an untenable offer: that I travel to New York for a conversation with President Clinton only. No official transcript would be recorded and other Members of Congress would be barred from participating. I have rejected the Clintons’ ridiculous offer.
The Clintons’ latest demands make clear they believe their last name entitles them to special treatment. The House Oversight Committee’s bipartisan subpoenas require the Clintons to appear for depositions that are under oath and transcribed. Former President Clinton has a documented history of parsing language to evade questions, responded falsely under oath, and was impeached and suspended from the practice of law as a result.
The absence of an official transcript is an indefensible demand that is insulting to the American people who demand answers about Epstein’s crimes. As part of our investigation, the House Oversight Committee has released transcripts of interviews with former U.S. Attorney General Bill Barr and former U.S. Secretary of Labor Alex Acosta, which has provided much needed transparency to the public. Without a formal record, Americans would be left to rely on competing accounts of what was said.
Former Secretary Clinton’s on-the-record testimony is necessary for the Committee’s investigation given her knowledge from her time as Secretary of State of the federal government’s work to counter international sex-tracking rings, her personal knowledge of Ms. Maxwell, and her family's relationship with Mr. Epstein.
Contempt proceedings begin tomorrow.”

 

[Solemateleft]

Master Class from the Master of the DEAL!!! View attachment 284779

​

Trump Davos Speech...
Trumps delivery is always going to be polarizing

but if we strip the style away and focus on the substance, the main points Trump hit in Davos today were basically these:
1) “America First” economics (again)
He leaned hard into the idea that the U.S. should rebuild industry at home, prioritize American workers, and stop “subsidizing” other countries through bad trade deals.
2) Pressure on allies / global burden-sharing
He repeated the theme that other wealthy nations should pay more for defense and global stability, and that the U.S. shouldn’t be the automatic “backstop” for everyone.
3) China + supply chain dependence
He pointed to the need for the West to reduce dependency on China, especially on manufacturing, critical goods, and strategic supply chains.
4) Energy dominance / lower energy costs
He pushed the view that cheap, reliable energy drives prosperity, and argued that energy policy has to prioritize affordability and security.
5) Anti-bureaucracy / anti-global-elite tone
Even in Davos, he framed things as regular people vs. powerful institutions, criticizing global systems as out-of-touch and overly controlling.
6) Business confidence: “If you invest in the U.S., you’ll win”
His overall message was basically: the U.S. is the best place to invest, and under his approach there would be more growth, fewer restrictions, and stronger markets.
7) Immigration = security + economic leverage
He tied immigration to national security, wages, and social stability, framing enforcement as necessary for a functioning economy.
The 3 STRONGEST arguments (even if people hate the delivery)
1) The world did get dangerously dependent on China
Why it lands:
Supply chains proved fragile (COVID, geopolitical tensions, shipping choke points). Even people who dislike Trump’s style admit the West has a problem here.
The strength:
It’s a national security issue, not just economics
It’s common sense: you can’t outsource everything essential and stay stable
Where it wins debates:
It’s hard to argue against “strategic independence” without sounding naive.
2) Burden-sharing isn’t crazy — it’s overdue
Why it lands:
A lot of Western allies enjoy U.S. protection while spending less relative to GDP. That imbalance has been real for decades.
The strength:
It’s a fairness argument
It resonates with taxpayers: “Why are we paying for everything?”
Where it wins debates:
Most people instinctively agree with “partners should carry their weight.”
3) Energy costs drive everything (food, rents, inflation, manufacturing)
Why it lands:
Energy is the hidden master lever. When energy is expensive, everything gets expensive.
The strength:
Lower energy → cheaper logistics → cheaper goods
Manufacturing becomes more competitive
More stability during global shocks
Where it wins debates:
It’s a grounded argument people feel in their daily life.
The 3 WEAKEST points / easiest to attack
1) “Decouple from China” sounds great… but is brutal in practice
Why critics jump on it:
You can’t instantly rebuild the industrial base without pain.
Reality problems:
Higher prices during transition
Major labor gaps + skills gaps
Takes years, not months
Companies resist if margins get hit
Best counter critics use:
“You’re promising a shortcut where there isn’t one.”
2) The “pressure allies” approach can backfire diplomatically
Why it’s vulnerable:
If allies feel publicly humiliated, they don’t cooperate — they hedge.
Risk:
allies shift deals toward China (or just go neutral)
less intelligence sharing
fractured coordination
Best counter critics use:
“You’re right about fairness — wrong about tactics.”
3) Immigration talk often turns into a single-issue hammer
Why it’s vulnerable:
Immigration is real, but economies also depend on labor flow.
Hard reality:
construction, agriculture, hospitality, healthcare = labor hungry
enforcement without reform can spike costs and shortages
Best counter critics use:
“You’re treating a complex pipeline like a simple shutoff valve.”

 

[Solemateleft]

Master Class from the Master of the DEAL!!!
View attachment 284779

Trump, his TEAM and his Tariff's have just DEFEATED the Deep State Globalist Great Rest Plan and New World Order!!! Game Over!!!

Craig Bergman
The Great Reset Got Reset
Davos spent years preaching a borderless, technocratic “stakeholder” future. Trump didn’t just reject it—he forced the world to admit it doesn’t work.
The World Economic Forum branded its post-COVID vision as “The Great Reset.” Klaus Schwab even put the phrase on the cover of a book.
They meant a reset toward technocracy: climate pledges, ESG scorekeeping, supranational coordination, “stakeholder” governance—always delivered from the top down, always justified as “inevitable.”
Then reality intervened: COVID, supply-chain shocks, war in Europe, energy scarcity, China’s leverage, and the hollowing out of Western industry. Now even the Forum’s own flagship risk report admits the world is entering an “Age of Competition,” where geoeconomic confrontation is the top near-term risk.
That’s not the Great Reset they wanted. But it’s the reset the world needs.
And Trump is the catalytic force that made that pivot unavoidable.
Trump didn’t invent the backlash to globalism—he made it governable, durable, and impossible to unsee.
Davos heard the obituary—on its own stage
When U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick went into Davos and declared “globalization has failed,” the reaction wasn’t polite disagreement—it was open hostility. The Financial Times reported jeers at a dinner and noted Christine Lagarde walking out.
That moment is bigger than Lutnick’s phrasing. It’s bigger than one dinner.
It signaled something Davos hates to admit: the old orthodoxy is no longer merely contested outside the room. It’s being challenged inside the cathedral.
Offshoring didn’t make us richer. It made us weaker.
For 30 years, the elite story was simple: global labor arbitrage would deliver cheaper goods, higher corporate margins, and peace through interdependence. The costs—lost factories, lost skills, broken towns—were treated as “creative destruction.”
But the research that undermines that story isn’t a right-wing blog post. It’s mainstream economics.
David Autor, David Dorn, and Gordon Hanson’s “China Shock” work found that import competition from China had large, persistent negative effects on U.S. local labor markets—and that import competition explains a significant share of the manufacturing employment decline.
That’s the heart of the matter: offshoring didn’t just move production. It exported capability—the practical know-how of making things at scale. Once that capability leaves, “innovation” becomes a slogan. Supply chains become a dependency. And national resilience becomes a press release.
“Net Zero” without industry is dependency by design
Lutnick’s now-famous battery line—why pledge “Net Zero” if you don’t even make the batteries—hits because it exposes the moral performance embedded in Western climate politics. Europe can mandate electrification and promise decarbonization. But if the critical inputs are made elsewhere, then the policy is less “green” than it is geopolitical surrender.
The Forum itself now describes the world as “rewiring” around industrial policy, supply-chain relocation, and financial realignment—the very opposite of the frictionless-globalization story it sold for years.
That’s the quiet confession: the transition can’t be sustained by speeches and targets. It requires capacity—mines, refining, manufacturing, energy, logistics, skilled labor, and secure inputs.
The “center-left” has already admitted the old model failed
If you want proof this isn’t just “Trump people talking,” look at the policy language Democrats themselves adopted.
Jake Sullivan’s 2023 Brookings speech openly argued for renewing American economic leadership through public investment, supply-chain resilience, and rebuilding industrial strength—explicitly rejecting the idea that maximum market integration automatically serves the national interest.
And Dani Rodrik’s famous “political trilemma” argument—cited and debated across the mainstream—states you can’t simultaneously have deep hyper-globalization, national sovereignty, and democratic politics. Something has to give.
That’s the pivot in a nutshell: you can’t run a democracy like a spreadsheet. When policy is outsourced to global technocrats, you don’t get harmony—you get backlash.
Here’s what Trump changed: he moved the Overton window—and locked it in
Trump didn’t create the structural problems. He exposed them, named them, and—most importantly—made them politically actionable.
In 2018, Trump used Section 301 to target China’s technology-transfer and IP practices and set the precedent that trade policy is also national security policy. The Congressional Research Service summarized that the Trump administration imposed Section 301 tariffs across about two-thirds of U.S. imports from China (across four rounds).
Then the “unthinkable” happened: the next administration didn’t roll that architecture back. It kept it—and in some categories expanded it. A Cambridge American Journal of International Law note describes Biden’s decision to “add some, increase others, and maintain” Trump’s China tariffs.
That continuity is the real reset. And the Left and the TDS perps cannot walk this back or argue that it was a failure in any way.
It tells every boardroom and every foreign ministry the same thing: the era of cheap moral posturing with outsourced production is over. The United States is now willing—across party lines—to prioritize resilience, re-industrialization, and strategic independence over globalist purity.
Even the Wall Street Journal has framed Trump’s tariff posture as an attempt to “bring down the curtain” on the era of globalization.
Davos can’t “Great Reset” its way out of this.
The WEF built its influence by presenting a single integrated story: global governance, global markets, global standards. But its own Global Risks Report now leads with geoeconomic confrontation—because that’s what the world has become.
Even the IMF warns about the costs of fragmentation—meaning it accepts fragmentation as a defining trend, not a conspiracy theory.
That’s where we are: the institutions that sold the old model are now publishing memos about how to survive its collapse.
The reset we need. And got!!
Let Davos keep its conferences. Let them keep their panels about “stakeholders.”
But nations should keep what actually matters:
Borders that mean something.
Energy policy that privileges security over symbolism
An industrial base that can build the essentials
Supply chains that don’t become choke chains
And a moral framework that puts citizens first—because that is why God created government!
The Great Reset crowd wanted a world run by unelected planners, with nation-states treated like outdated software.
Trump forced the opposite reset: a return to sovereignty, production, and the hard truth that liberty and independence require capacity.
That isn’t isolation.
That’s adulthood.
And make no mistake at all. We would not be having this conversation without Trump and his tariffs.

 

[Solemateleft]

TRUTH BOMBS!!!

 

[Solemateleft]

MASSIVE WIN for law and order! The FBI just slammed those traitorous Democrats—Governor Tim Walz and his buddy Mayor Jacob Frey—with grand jury subpoenas TODAY in the huge federal probe over obstructing ICE and blocking our brave immigration agents! These two have been openly defying President Trump's America First agenda, shielding illegals, stirring up protests, and putting radical left politics over the safety of real American citizens. Finally, the DOJ under strong Republican leadership is cracking down—no more sanctuary nonsense, no more letting criminals run free while our borders get trampled!This is what real accountability looks like, folks! Walz with his smug attitude and Frey whining about federal agents—they thought they could thumb their noses at the law forever, but the hammer just dropped hard. Time to lock 'em up and send a message to every Democrat who hates our country! Share if you're cheering for justice and praying for more wins like this. God bless President Trump, God bless our ICE heroes, and God bless the United States of America!
https://www.facebook.com/share/1C3FQGVKwn/?mibextid=wwXIfr

 

[Solemateleft]

BREAKING: President Trump tells the World Economic Forum that prosecutions related to 2020 election fraud will begin in the coming days.

https://t.me/PatriotsSeekTruth/97876
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1BtBbsuoQc/?mibextid=wwXIfr

 

[gb9]

BREAKING: President Trump tells the World Economic Forum that prosecutions related to 2020 election fraud will begin in the coming days.

https://t.me/PatriotsSeekTruth/97876
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1BtBbsuoQc/?mibextid=wwXIfr

i have heard this theory floated around- if election fraud is proven, and trump is declared the rightful winner of the 2020 election, then the deep state dems will say that was his 2nd term, and should be immediately removed from office, and then ask the supreme court to do so...

 

[ZNP]

Trump, his TEAM and his Tariff's have just DEFEATED the Deep State Globalist Great Rest Plan and New World Order!!! Game Over!!!
View attachment 284790
Craig Bergman
The Great Reset Got Reset
Davos spent years preaching a borderless, technocratic “stakeholder” future. Trump didn’t just reject it—he forced the world to admit it doesn’t work.
The World Economic Forum branded its post-COVID vision as “The Great Reset.” Klaus Schwab even put the phrase on the cover of a book.
They meant a reset toward technocracy: climate pledges, ESG scorekeeping, supranational coordination, “stakeholder” governance—always delivered from the top down, always justified as “inevitable.”
Then reality intervened: COVID, supply-chain shocks, war in Europe, energy scarcity, China’s leverage, and the hollowing out of Western industry. Now even the Forum’s own flagship risk report admits the world is entering an “Age of Competition,” where geoeconomic confrontation is the top near-term risk.
That’s not the Great Reset they wanted. But it’s the reset the world needs.
And Trump is the catalytic force that made that pivot unavoidable.
Trump didn’t invent the backlash to globalism—he made it governable, durable, and impossible to unsee.
Davos heard the obituary—on its own stage
When U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick went into Davos and declared “globalization has failed,” the reaction wasn’t polite disagreement—it was open hostility. The Financial Times reported jeers at a dinner and noted Christine Lagarde walking out.
That moment is bigger than Lutnick’s phrasing. It’s bigger than one dinner.
It signaled something Davos hates to admit: the old orthodoxy is no longer merely contested outside the room. It’s being challenged inside the cathedral.
Offshoring didn’t make us richer. It made us weaker.
For 30 years, the elite story was simple: global labor arbitrage would deliver cheaper goods, higher corporate margins, and peace through interdependence. The costs—lost factories, lost skills, broken towns—were treated as “creative destruction.”
But the research that undermines that story isn’t a right-wing blog post. It’s mainstream economics.
David Autor, David Dorn, and Gordon Hanson’s “China Shock” work found that import competition from China had large, persistent negative effects on U.S. local labor markets—and that import competition explains a significant share of the manufacturing employment decline.
That’s the heart of the matter: offshoring didn’t just move production. It exported capability—the practical know-how of making things at scale. Once that capability leaves, “innovation” becomes a slogan. Supply chains become a dependency. And national resilience becomes a press release.
“Net Zero” without industry is dependency by design
Lutnick’s now-famous battery line—why pledge “Net Zero” if you don’t even make the batteries—hits because it exposes the moral performance embedded in Western climate politics. Europe can mandate electrification and promise decarbonization. But if the critical inputs are made elsewhere, then the policy is less “green” than it is geopolitical surrender.
The Forum itself now describes the world as “rewiring” around industrial policy, supply-chain relocation, and financial realignment—the very opposite of the frictionless-globalization story it sold for years.
That’s the quiet confession: the transition can’t be sustained by speeches and targets. It requires capacity—mines, refining, manufacturing, energy, logistics, skilled labor, and secure inputs.
The “center-left” has already admitted the old model failed
If you want proof this isn’t just “Trump people talking,” look at the policy language Democrats themselves adopted.
Jake Sullivan’s 2023 Brookings speech openly argued for renewing American economic leadership through public investment, supply-chain resilience, and rebuilding industrial strength—explicitly rejecting the idea that maximum market integration automatically serves the national interest.
And Dani Rodrik’s famous “political trilemma” argument—cited and debated across the mainstream—states you can’t simultaneously have deep hyper-globalization, national sovereignty, and democratic politics. Something has to give.
That’s the pivot in a nutshell: you can’t run a democracy like a spreadsheet. When policy is outsourced to global technocrats, you don’t get harmony—you get backlash.
Here’s what Trump changed: he moved the Overton window—and locked it in
Trump didn’t create the structural problems. He exposed them, named them, and—most importantly—made them politically actionable.
In 2018, Trump used Section 301 to target China’s technology-transfer and IP practices and set the precedent that trade policy is also national security policy. The Congressional Research Service summarized that the Trump administration imposed Section 301 tariffs across about two-thirds of U.S. imports from China (across four rounds).
Then the “unthinkable” happened: the next administration didn’t roll that architecture back. It kept it—and in some categories expanded it. A Cambridge American Journal of International Law note describes Biden’s decision to “add some, increase others, and maintain” Trump’s China tariffs.
That continuity is the real reset. And the Left and the TDS perps cannot walk this back or argue that it was a failure in any way.
It tells every boardroom and every foreign ministry the same thing: the era of cheap moral posturing with outsourced production is over. The United States is now willing—across party lines—to prioritize resilience, re-industrialization, and strategic independence over globalist purity.
Even the Wall Street Journal has framed Trump’s tariff posture as an attempt to “bring down the curtain” on the era of globalization.
Davos can’t “Great Reset” its way out of this.
The WEF built its influence by presenting a single integrated story: global governance, global markets, global standards. But its own Global Risks Report now leads with geoeconomic confrontation—because that’s what the world has become.
Even the IMF warns about the costs of fragmentation—meaning it accepts fragmentation as a defining trend, not a conspiracy theory.
That’s where we are: the institutions that sold the old model are now publishing memos about how to survive its collapse.
The reset we need. And got!!
Let Davos keep its conferences. Let them keep their panels about “stakeholders.”
But nations should keep what actually matters:
Borders that mean something.
Energy policy that privileges security over symbolism
An industrial base that can build the essentials
Supply chains that don’t become choke chains
And a moral framework that puts citizens first—because that is why God created government!
The Great Reset crowd wanted a world run by unelected planners, with nation-states treated like outdated software.
Trump forced the opposite reset: a return to sovereignty, production, and the hard truth that liberty and independence require capacity.
That isn’t isolation.
That’s adulthood.
And make no mistake at all. We would not be having this conversation without Trump and his tariffs.

That is what Ole Yeller thought about the rattlesnake.

 

[ZNP]

Rep. James Comer just dropped the hammer on the Clintons!…
“Facing contempt of Congress, the Clintons’ lawyers made an untenable offer: that I travel to New York for a conversation with President Clinton only. No official transcript would be recorded and other Members of Congress would be barred from participating. I have rejected the Clintons’ ridiculous offer.
The Clintons’ latest demands make clear they believe their last name entitles them to special treatment. The House Oversight Committee’s bipartisan subpoenas require the Clintons to appear for depositions that are under oath and transcribed. Former President Clinton has a documented history of parsing language to evade questions, responded falsely under oath, and was impeached and suspended from the practice of law as a result.
The absence of an official transcript is an indefensible demand that is insulting to the American people who demand answers about Epstein’s crimes. As part of our investigation, the House Oversight Committee has released transcripts of interviews with former U.S. Attorney General Bill Barr and former U.S. Secretary of Labor Alex Acosta, which has provided much needed transparency to the public. Without a formal record, Americans would be left to rely on competing accounts of what was said.
Former Secretary Clinton’s on-the-record testimony is necessary for the Committee’s investigation given her knowledge from her time as Secretary of State of the federal government’s work to counter international sex-tracking rings, her personal knowledge of Ms. Maxwell, and her family's relationship with Mr. Epstein.
Contempt proceedings begin tomorrow.”
View attachment 284789

Massive snake migration shuts down miles of Illinois road

The snakes are on the run

 

[Solemateleft]

i have heard this theory floated around- if election fraud is proven, and trump is declared the rightful winner of the 2020 election, then the deep state dems will say that was his 2nd term, and should be immediately removed from office, and then ask the supreme court to do so...

lol… yep, they probably would try that…
But, you’ve been listening to the wrong side of this scenario projections…
That obviously wouldn’t work…
Because all the corrupt DS D’s operatives would be implicated and arrested, before they would be able to make that claim…
Their credibility will be totally destroyed!!!
lol, that logic is so ridiculously flawed… they stole the election, occupied the White House, and wanna claim that counts as his term in office…. Hahaha
People will finally be awake to the entire Treasonous Conspiracy to include, the legal system and MSM fake news…
No, they won’t get a pass to try to use the legal system as their defense..
The real Covert aspect of these Operations, that will likely stay covert is that Those of us in the know, know that Trump was already running this Epic Sting Operation from Mar Lago… via the continuity of government clause…
Looks like they will be forced push towards civil war…
Pushing the insurrection act and martial law…
The military will be in control…
Trump will stay in office afterwards when the dust settles… and the DS has been eliminated…
Game over… the global rest is toast and there is a new sheriff driving the new world future..

 

[Solemateleft]

Live: X22 Report: Bondi Arrests Church Rioters, Trump's Message At DAVOS Is Loud & Clear & The [DS] Knows It
Thursday, January 22, 2026 17:45

 

[Solemateleft]

1.22.26: AF1 Scare Event, America First, Do not let THEM divide you, Concessions made, Pray!

 

[Solemateleft]

Ep 3824a - The [CB]s Are Trapped, Control Over Each Nation Is Coming To An End, Watch Gold & Silver

 

[Solemateleft]

WHY haven't there been any Major League ARRESTS so far?
It's literally akin to the definition of 'Insanity' after banging your head against the wall over and over and expecting a different outcome...
We need to UNRIG the LEGAL SYSTEM BEFORE we can Implement the RULE of LAW and LAW and ORDER to Arrest all the GUILTY Big-Wigs who the DS is inclined to keep defending as long as the are able to...

 

[Solemateleft]

The “Donroe Doctrine” In Action -
In snatching Maduro, Trump pulled the linchpin holding China’s global strategy together.
J. Michael Waller

 

[Solemateleft]

Truth in lending...

 

[Solemateleft]

Trump is Projecting COMMS for Nuremberg 2.0 where the MSM Fake News along with their POLLSTERS will be held liable as liars for their Conspirator Roles leading up to the 2020 Elections

 

[Solemateleft]

Master of the Deal!!!

 

[Solemateleft]

1.23.26: FIGHT the good fight, Justice served, MN, Jack SMITH PAIN, Arctic Frost, Pray!