Well, that makes no sense. Over 63 million lives, murdered. In the sight of God you have blood on your hands if you support abortion. Death penalty I support because the Bible supports it. You don't let child molesters and murderers out on the street because there may be innocent people put to death. What you do is make sure innocent people aren't put to death.
As Close To The Devil In Example As You Can Get.
- Thread starter JesusLives
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Well, that makes no sense. Over 63 million lives, murdered. In the sight of God you have blood on your hands if you support abortion. Death penalty I support because the Bible supports it. You don't let child molesters and murderers out on the street because there may be innocent people put to death. What you do is make sure innocent people aren't put to death.
I'm anti-abortion AND anti death penalty. BTW, I'm Independent.
You are probably going to quote a scripture that's out of context or something under law instead of grace.
I agree with Ray Comfort’s view of the death penalty after looking at the video so I will say that I'm in the middle. I'm For it AND against it, because some innocent people have been killed without good evidence so I don't know how someone would know if someone is truly guilty or not, only God could make the right judgement EVERY time.
I’m not a big fan of death penalty myself but knowing who has done a crime has always been relatively easy while it’s true that rarely some errors have happened.
Today it’s easier than ever to know a lot of times. You know how you know if someone commited a crime?
You look at the camera footage!
And you know what the democrats do when they see someone killing another person on camera?
They let them go free!
So I’d say when you compare who makes the greatest error, it would be the Dems.
I have.Probably 70 % of the people at my church vote democrat.
I thought this was a thread about trump though.
Since it is Democrats who are allowing for abortions to take place, don't you believe your actions are leading to the death of unborn children?
Right there is no way as a Christian you can justify voting Dem. It's like saying you're an atheist Christian.
Well they are 100% wrong. Either they aren't listening to the preacher or the preacher isn't doing his job and ought to lose it.
They will tell you that God also hates a liar. Trump is always doing that and don’t you still support him? He was convicted of rape and you still support him.IDK would you say supporting this type action is 100% wrong.IDK
Voting for people who foster the killing of unborn children. Your vote helps put them into office which they use to put policies in place to kill the unborn. This is funny?What actions would that be?
Even if you believe people are wrong for voting for Trump, that doesn't change the fact that your vote allows babies to be killed. How do you reconcile that with your Christian beliefs?
No, stop, don't even start with but Trump. If you find fault with him and can't support him you sure can't support Dems. No one lies more than Dems. And the ones that accuse Trump of lying are the Dems, while they are lying.
No he was not convicted of rape. And I don't believe her, at all. And it has nothing to do with Trump. She was interviewed by Anderson Cooper and said "most people think of rape as being sexy". Who? I don't know one woman in her right mind who would think that. I don't believe her story even a little. Any more than I believed the one who went after Judge Cavanaugh. She's a kook, you can tell when she was being interviewed. She seemed to be flirting with Cooper, who is gay of course, so she was wasting her time. I don't care who she had accused I don't believe her nor the one that accused the judge.
IMO your vote also allows for someone innocent that received the death penalty to lose their life even though they are innocent.
That's why I believe when a person says that they are pro-life but for the death penalty, I always think of how do they answer to being for the death of someone who might be innocent.
I understand what you mean because although he was found guilty by a jury and convicted of sexual abuse how can we be sure he really did what he was found guilty of.The judge said he was guilty but you don't accept his ruling.
The answer depends on whether you are looking for a legal definition or a layman's definition, as there was a significant distinction made by the court.
In May 2023, a federal jury in New York reached a verdict in the civil lawsuit brought by E. Jean Carroll. Here are the key details:
1. The Legal Verdict: "Sexual Abuse"
Under the technical legal definition in New York at the time, the jury did not find Donald Trump liable for "rape."
• The Reason: New York law specifically defined rape as non-consensual penetration of the vagina by a penis.
• The Finding: The jury instead found him liable for sexual abuse (battery), which covered forcible, non-consensual penetration with fingers. They also found him liable for defamation for calling Carroll’s claims a "hoax."
2. The Judge’s Clarification: "Rape" in Common Parlance
Following the verdict, Trump’s legal team argued that the jury had "exonerated" him of rape. However, Judge Lewis Kaplan issued a strong clarification in a July 2023 ruling:
• He stated that the jury’s finding—that Trump had forcibly and non-consensually penetrated Carroll’s vagina with his fingers—is what is commonly understood as rape in everyday language and in many other legal jurisdictions.
• The judge wrote that the jury’s verdict meant they found Carroll's claim of being raped "substantially true," even if it didn't meet the specific, narrow requirements of the New York Penal Law at the time.
No, I don't believe her. I don't agree with rape, I just don't believe her and I wouldn't no matter who she accused. So back to the subject, you can't support what Dems do and the Bible at the same time, it's impossible.