This is actually a good opportunity to clarify the heart of the issue — because your reply reveals a confusion between two different kinds of baptism (Spirit vs. water) and a misunderstanding of Peter’s role.
Brother, I agree that Cornelius’ Spirit baptism was indeed a sign — but not a sign for Peter to add a ritual requirement.
It was a sign from God that Gentiles had already been accepted by faith, before any water touched them.
“Can any man forbid water, that these should not be baptized, which have received the Holy Ghost as well as we?” — Acts 10:47
Peter’s words don’t make water the means of forgiveness — they show water as the confirmation of forgiveness already received.
If the Holy Spirit had already fallen on them, then their sins were already remitted. The Spirit never indwells the unforgiven.
That’s why Peter later explained it this way in Acts 11:17–18:
“Forasmuch then as God gave them the like gift as he did unto us, who believed on the Lord Jesus Christ, what was I, that I could withstand God? … Then hath God also to the Gentiles granted repentance unto life.”
Notice — faith and repentance unto life came first. The gift of the Spirit confirmed it. Water baptism followed as outward testimony.
About Peter and the “Keys of the Kingdom”
Yes, Jesus gave Peter the “keys of the kingdom” (Matthew 16:19) — but keys open doors, they don’t wash sins.
Peter used those keys three times:
- To the Jews (Acts 2)
- To the Samaritans (Acts 8, through confirmation by Peter and John)
- To the Gentiles (Acts 10)
Each time, he opened a new “door” of gospel access — but he didn’t create a new method of salvation. The same pattern follows:
Faith → Spirit → Water — never reversed.
Water vs. Spirit Baptism
You’re right that the baptism of the Spirit empowered the disciples (Acts 1:8), but in Cornelius’ case, it also served as a sign of full acceptance.
Peter explicitly recognized that the Spirit’s outpouring on Gentiles proved that salvation was already theirs.
If water were the instrument of remission, Peter would have said, “Let’s baptize them so they can receive forgiveness.”
Instead, he said, “Can we withhold water from those who have already received the Spirit?”
That’s a completely different order — and one the text makes unambiguous.
Basically:
- The Spirit fell before baptism → showing salvation had already occurred.
- Peter used the “keys” to affirm inclusion, not to dispense forgiveness.
- Water baptism was obedience and identification, not the cause of remission.
“To him give all the prophets witness, that through his name whosoever believeth in him shall receive remission of sins.” — Acts 10:43
That’s the verse Peter himself spoke right before the Spirit fell.
It was belief, not water, that brought forgiveness — and the Spirit confirmed it.
Grace and Peace