I can see the similarities that an animal had to die to cover thier nakedness. It was in fact the first sacrafice that tought blood is the only way to cover sin. In this case thier embarrassing nakedness. And that the blood had to be sinless. Which animals by thier nature are.
Christ sacrifice on the cross was sufficient for every many woman and child in the world if that is how it would of ended up working. However it dosent. So it is sufficient to whosoever calls on his name. Whether that be 10 people or 10 billion.
Since your answer is a wee bit ambiguous, I'll ask again: I take it that you believe the atonement made in the Garden that involved slain animals whose skins were used for sin coverings for A&E was efficacious? If so, did God make that atonement
before or after A or E expressed any faith or repentance?
Conversely, the atonement on the Cross by Christ is considered by most Christians to have efficacy for only those who demonstrate faith and repentance after the fact.
By your reply you seem to hold to two different views on the efficacious nature of the atonement. In the Garden, the atonement was 100% efficacious
BEFORE any expression of faith or repentance were made
and, therefore, not dependent upon A&E's response. But at the Cross, you seem to be saying that the "efficacy" of the Cross atonement
totally depends on man's response to Christ's work. Therefore, given these facts, FWers hold to two different, opposing views of Atonement; for there is no biblical evidence that A&E repented and trusted God for his provision in the Garden
PRIOR to his gracious provision.