Do All Religions Lead To God?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
That's right...the revelation is the antecedent to the blessing and the rock the church is built upon.
Why would anyone want to trace its history to Peter? Jesus is the firstborn among the brethren. He is the one we trace our history to.


Why Peter? because Jesus said that's the rock upon which he would build HIS church. Most people hate this fact only because it's the catholic church.
 
No other church presently in existence can even remotely begin to trace it's history back
to Peter and as much as it aggravates me iye sensibilities the Catholic Church can
Perhaps a lot of dressing to go with this word salad would make it more palatable?

Thankfully the RCC has once again changed its stance on something they were quite attached to.

Have you heard they finally acknowledge that Jesus is the only mediator between God and man?

Removing Mary from the equation was long overdo. They have changed much over the years because they are error ridden.
 
Perhaps a lot of dressing to go with this word salad would make it more palatable?

Thankfully the RCC has once again changed its stance on something they were quite attached to.

Have you heard they finally acknowledge that Jesus is the only mediator between God and man?

Removing Mary from the equation was long overdo. They have changed much over the years because they are error ridden.

You can rail as much as you like but only the catholic church can trace it's history back to the apostles. That fact isn't nullified by your personal hatred for the Catholic Church
 
Why Peter? because Jesus said that's the rock upon which he would build HIS church. Most people hate this fact only because it's the catholic church.
Catholics hate the fact that the Rock is not Peter.
 
You can rail as much as you like but only the catholic church can trace it's history back to the apostles. That fact isn't nullified by your personal hatred for the Catholic Church
Your false accusations are devoid of truth.Telling the truth about the error-ridden RCC is not hatred.
 
Why Peter? because Jesus said that's the rock upon which he would build HIS church. Most people hate this fact only because it's the catholic church.
Every true church goes back to Pentecost, not Peter.
 
Every true church goes back to Pentecost, not Peter.

No they don't. And Peter was the rock upon which Jesus built HIS church. Jesus gave Peter and the apostles the authority to forgive sins. The earliest days of the church after Peter were decidedly catholic.
 
It gets very confusing with all the different religions and claims that this or that belief or ideas from various movements that they have the path that leads to God, so is it. When you hear a religious leader or teacher claim that all religions lead on a path to God, scripture is clear that is not the case. We find it in John 14...

John 14:6
Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.

Jesus declares that the only way to God is through Him.

https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=5fd0...cmVsaWdpb25zX2xlYWRfdG9fb25lX2dvZC5odG0&ntb=1

Thanks Reddogs for your post about Jesus being the only way. I did not click on the link, but I liked the John 14:6 scripture. The post reminded me of the book of James: "Pure religion and undefiled before God and the Father is this, To visit the fatherless and widows in their affliction, and to keep himself unspotted from the world. "

I think that it is very good to visit those whose are fatherless, but I am thinking that this scripture might primarily mean to bring Jesus to those who are not Christians yet (and so who have no heavenly father in that sense). This seems to me to be a use of the term visit in the Bible since Jesus talked about the day of his visitation, when he is available and present. It is also very good to visit widows in need but I am thinking that that might primarily mean those who are alone who have lost the covenant protection of Christians. Also, I am thinking unspotted might not mean not having physical leopard-like spots but instead not engaging in sin. Anyway, that is a scripture that came to mind, one from James.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sipsey
No other church presently in existence can even remotely begin to trace it's history back to Peter and as much as it aggravates me iye sensibilities the Catholic Church can
The Church in Jerusalem, and all other congregations noted in scripture. So, how were they created and can't a congregation be likewise created today? Absolutely can! Believers baptized others into Christ as was done in scripture like on the day of Pentecost in Jerusalem. There, the 1st Church was created and in wasn't Catholic nor any denomination. So likewise, churches can be established today and are without affiliation with or burdened by names or titles.
 
No they don't. And Peter was the rock upon which Jesus built HIS church. Jesus gave Peter and the apostles the authority to forgive sins. The earliest days of the church after Peter were decidedly catholic.
Ok.
 
And Peter was the rock upon which Jesus built HIS church.
Peter whom Jesus referred to as Satan? Heh. One must wonder why Catholics flock to Protestant sites.

I suppose they are eager to spread their errors and misinformation.
 
No they don't. And Peter was the rock upon which Jesus built HIS church. Jesus gave Peter and the apostles the authority to forgive sins. The earliest days of the church after Peter were decidedly catholic.
You make the same mistake with Peter that the RCC has made for centuries with Mary.

But the RCC loves their errors!
 
Christtheonlymediator.png

Yes, boys and girls, it is true! The Vatican has ordered the world’s estimated 1.4 billion Catholics to no longer refer to Mary as the “co-redeemer” of the world, reaffirming that only Jesus Christ came to save humanity by offering salvation and eternal life to all who believe in Him. Christ is the only mediator between God and man.
 
The Church in Jerusalem, and all other congregations noted in scripture. So, how were they created and can't a congregation be likewise created today? Absolutely can! Believers baptized others into Christ as was done in scripture like on the day of Pentecost in Jerusalem. There, the 1st Church was created and in wasn't Catholic nor any denomination. So likewise, churches can be established today and are without affiliation with or burdened by names or titles.

Oh course the early church was Catholic. Notice the year. Ignatius of Antioch a disciple of the apostle John

“I have no taste for corruptible food nor for the pleasures of this life. I desire the bread of God, which is the flesh of Jesus Christ, who was of the seed of David; and for drink I desire his blood, which is love incorruptible” (Letter to the Romans 7:3 [A.D. 110]).

“Take note of those who hold heterodox opinions on the grace of Jesus Christ which has come to us, and see how contrary their opinions are to the mind of God. . . . They abstain from the Eucharist and from prayer because they do not confess that the Eucharist is the flesh of our Savior Jesus Christ, flesh which suffered for our sins and which that Father, in his goodness, raised up again. They who deny the gift of God are perishing in their disputes” (Letter to the Smyrnaeans 6:2–7:1 [A.D. 110]).

This echoes Paul 1Cor 11:27-39

27 God’s Judgment on the Community.[a] Therefore, anyone who eats the bread and drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner is guilty of an offense against the body and blood of the Lord. 28 Everyone should examine himself about eating the bread and drinking from the cup. 29 For a person who eats and drinks without discerning the body of the Lord is eating and drinking judgment on himself.

30 That is why many of you are weak and ill, and a number of you have fallen asleep.
 
On the other hand it is still mandated for the world's millions and millions and millions of Catholics that they believe the fabrications of Mary's immaculate conception and her bodily assumption to heaven. Some people get a little confused and think the so-called immaculate conception has to do with Jesus being born of virgin, but no, it is asserted by the RCC with absolutely no Scripture to back it that Mary was preserved from what is widely understood to be the sin of Adam, which the whole world according to Scripture is subject to, since sin and death passed to all. They say she was born free from the stain of original sin and lived a completely sinless life and this was so that Jesus could be born sinless as the Son of God as if He needed her help! They say this also established her as the "New Eve" and they further call her the mother of us all and queen of heaven, etc, major ugh. However if Mary needed to be sinless in order for Jesus to be born sinless then every woman all the way back to Eve would likewise need to be sinless and we know what a farcical thought that is. And that is just the one of two ex cathedra dogmas mandated for the Catholic to be believed and deceived by! The second one being that she was bodily assumed to heaven, which there is no Scripture evidence for, but the popes just love to wax poetic about Mary and elevate her above other women even though Jesus rebuked those who did so. But according to these idolized men within the RCC Mary never sinned so she did not need to die either, did she? Since death is the wages of sin.
 
On the other hand it is still mandated for the world's millions and millions and millions of Catholics that they believe the fabrications of Mary's immaculate conception and her bodily assumption to heaven. Some people get a little confused and think the so-called immaculate conception has to do with Jesus being born of virgin, but no, it is asserted by the RCC with absolutely no Scripture to back it that Mary was preserved from what is widely understood to be the sin of Adam, which the whole world according to Scripture is subject to, since sin and death passed to all. They say she was born free from the stain of original sin and lived a completely sinless life and this was so that Jesus could be born sinless as the Son of God as if He needed her help! They say this also established her as the "New Eve" and they further call her the mother of us all and queen of heaven, etc, major ugh. However if |Mary needed to be sinless in order for Jesus to be born sinless then every woman all the way back to Eve would likewise need to be sinless and we know what a farcical thought that is. And that is just the one of two ex cathedra dogmas mandated for the Catholic to be believed and deceived by! The second one being that she was bodily assumed to heaven, which there is no Scripture evidence for, but the popes just love to wax poetic about Mary and elevate her above other women even though Jesus rebuked those who did so. But according to these idolized men within the RCC Mary never sinned so she did not need to die either, did she? Since death is the wages of sin.

Despite your hatred the Catholic Church is the only church that can reasonably trace it's history back to the apostles. Now if you can show me something from the early church that teaches sola fide I'd love to see it.
 
Despite your hatred the Catholic Church is the only church that can reasonably trace it's history back to the apostles. Now if you can show me something from the early church that teaches sola fide I'd love to see it.
Despite your repeated lies and false accusations I do not hate the RCC. I feel
sorry for those trapped by its many deceptions. I hope they "come out of her."
 
Despite your repeated lies and false accusations I do not hate the RCC. I feel
sorry for those trapped by its many deceptions. I hope they "come out of her."

But you do. Why would anyone leave a church that can trace its history back to the apostles to join a strip mall church that can't even trace it's history back to the 1990s?
 
This is what happens when men get involved with GOD'S word.
f
.
5 For John truly baptized with water; but ye shall be baptized with the Holy Ghost not many days hence.


Question. why do you use the term "holy ghost', the word in Greek is Spirit, breath

you might be interested in this from the web


During the Middle Ages, Christian translators created a way to make the English Bible ---- reflect -- their belief---

---that the Holy Ghost was not the Holy Spirit.---

These theologians -- coined the phrase--- "Holy Ghost" to designate the Third Person of the Trinity.
In contrast, they used "Holy Spirit" to refer to the Spirit of God or Spirit of the LORD encountered by the Hebrews and Jews in the Old Testament.

Then, in the 16th century, Bible printers reinforced this distinction by introducing capital and small letters. In the OT they used "spirit" and "holy spirit." In the NT they printed "Spirit" and "Holy Ghost," but with subtle distinctions.

These translation and printing differences do not exist in the Bible itself, in either Hebrew or Greek.
They are invented theological biases – imported - into the (English) Bible.

They provided both verbal and visual validation for the already existing “conviction” --- that Christianity --- must be separated from its Hebraic/Jewish foundations.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sipsey