Testing, Testing... Welcome to the CC Family Forum REAL Personality Test!

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

seoulsearch

OutWrite Trouble
May 23, 2009
18,570
7,354
113
Hey Everyone,

I have to admit I haven't had the mental energy to write many threads completely from scratch lately, so I've been "digging into the archives" of threads that have been run before -- but are always fun to ask the current audience.

This thread is a bit of an experiment. After spending some time talking with chat friends about the results of various existing personality tests, I was thinking about some of the "Getting to Know You" threads we've had on the forum over the years.

I thought it might be interesting to expand upon that and find out a little bit more about each other's personalities. However, instead of answering 500 rounds of ambiguous questions and statements such as, "I am generally sometimes but not always most definitely a positively positive person," how about if we try seeing how people say they would respond to various situations instead?

I originally had ideas for 3 different situations for people to answer, but I'm going to try just this one story line first and will see how it goes.

I last ran this idea in 2020 so yes, I apologize to all the old timers out there, you have definitely seen this before. But perhaps in that time, your answers have changed?! :LOL:

And please don't let a re-run stop you from joining the fun and answering again, if you so desire! It's always fun to see how the current crowd (whether new or long-time members) will answer -- and how everyone interacts with each one another. (Will anyone be cancelled for, gasp, providing any non-socially acceptable answers?!)

So here's the situation:

* You have been asked to look after your friend's beloved pet goldfish for a week. During the time this little finned fiend is under your care, it sadly passes on to a much bigger pond (presumably in heaven.)

Do you:

1. Call or text to let your friend know right away!

2. Wait until your friend gets back, because you don't want to ruin their vacation.

3. Offer to buy your friend a new fish regardless of when you leak the bad news.

4. Remove the evidence, get a new fish, place it in the bowl and let it happily swim free as if nothing happened -- completely passing off this new fish as your friend's original -- and letting your friend believe THIS is his treasured aquatic companion.

PLOT TWISTS:

* If choosing answer #4, would you be more or less tempted to try to pass off a new fish as the old one if the fish were all one color and easy to replace? What would you do if said fish had unique colors or markings and would be impossible to duplicate?

* What if the fish died... Because you forgot to feed it? Would you confess this to your friend, or pretend you had no idea why the poor little guy didn't make it? (Maybe even dump out some of the fish food left for Finny in order to hide the evidence, making it look like you had actually fed him?!)

Feel free to choose any answers that apply, and tell us WHY you would choose those answers (in other words... we want to know if you would admit to it! And then why, or why not?!) These answers are not absolute, of course -- feel free to give us your own version of how you would handle it. Answers can be both humorous or serious, as long as they're honest! :)

And no worries about being analyzed -- it's going to be interesting enough just reading people's answers. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tall_Timbers
2. Wait until your friend gets back, because you don't want to ruin their vacation.
i would choose 2.theres a good chance the goldfish may have passed anyway.besides i wouldnt want to disrupt a friends mental state while on vacation.

I agree with you, Lisa.

I wouldn't want to ruin my friend's vacation, and I could never live through the guilt pangs of trying to replace their little friend...

I would just have to confess, "I'm so sorry, but God decided to call Finny home while you were gone -- and I would be happy to buy you another floaty friend." 🐟🐡🐠🦈
 
How big is this fish? Is "grill the fish, eat it, then reimburse the friend for the fish" on the table?

'Cause I do like me some grilled fish...

Humpty Dumpty sat on a wall
Humpty Dumpty had a great fall
All the king's horses
And all the king's men
Had scrambled eggs for breakfast. =^.^=
 
How big is this fish? Is "grill the fish, eat it, then reimburse the friend for the fish" on the table?

'Cause I do like me some grilled fish...

Humpty Dumpty sat on a wall
Humpty Dumpty had a great fall
All the king's horses
And all the king's men
Had scrambled eggs for breakfast. =^.^=

But... but...

How could you possibly fry up this adorable face?! :oops::(:cry:


1765382456133.jpeg
 
Hey Everyone,

I have to admit I haven't had the mental energy to write many threads completely from scratch lately, so I've been "digging into the archives" of threads that have been run before -- but are always fun to ask the current audience.

This thread is a bit of an experiment. After spending some time talking with chat friends about the results of various existing personality tests, I was thinking about some of the "Getting to Know You" threads we've had on the forum over the years.

I thought it might be interesting to expand upon that and find out a little bit more about each other's personalities. However, instead of answering 500 rounds of ambiguous questions and statements such as, "I am generally sometimes but not always most definitely a positively positive person," how about if we try seeing how people say they would respond to various situations instead?

I originally had ideas for 3 different situations for people to answer, but I'm going to try just this one story line first and will see how it goes.

I last ran this idea in 2020 so yes, I apologize to all the old timers out there, you have definitely seen this before. But perhaps in that time, your answers have changed?! :LOL:

And please don't let a re-run stop you from joining the fun and answering again, if you so desire! It's always fun to see how the current crowd (whether new or long-time members) will answer -- and how everyone interacts with each one another. (Will anyone be cancelled for, gasp, providing any non-socially acceptable answers?!)

So here's the situation:

* You have been asked to look after your friend's beloved pet goldfish for a week. During the time this little finned fiend is under your care, it sadly passes on to a much bigger pond (presumably in heaven.)

Do you:

1. Call or text to let your friend know right away!

2. Wait until your friend gets back, because you don't want to ruin their vacation.

3. Offer to buy your friend a new fish regardless of when you leak the bad news.

4. Remove the evidence, get a new fish, place it in the bowl and let it happily swim free as if nothing happened -- completely passing off this new fish as your friend's original -- and letting your friend believe THIS is his treasured aquatic companion.

PLOT TWISTS:

* If choosing answer #4, would you be more or less tempted to try to pass off a new fish as the old one if the fish were all one color and easy to replace? What would you do if said fish had unique colors or markings and would be impossible to duplicate?

* What if the fish died... Because you forgot to feed it? Would you confess this to your friend, or pretend you had no idea why the poor little guy didn't make it? (Maybe even dump out some of the fish food left for Finny in order to hide the evidence, making it look like you had actually fed him?!)

Feel free to choose any answers that apply, and tell us WHY you would choose those answers (in other words... we want to know if you would admit to it! And then why, or why not?!) These answers are not absolute, of course -- feel free to give us your own version of how you would handle it. Answers can be both humorous or serious, as long as they're honest! :)

And no worries about being analyzed -- it's going to be interesting enough just reading people's answers. :)

Depends on the person and depends on the fish!

If they have a HUGE attachment to it, either 3 or 4.
4 only if it's a cheap replacement!

If it is basically a decoration, I'd probably do 2.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tall_Timbers
Answer #2 for reasons already stated. If the little guy died from my malfeasance, I would openly acknowledge my error. I would willingly replace the fish if the owner greed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tall_Timbers
"I'm happy to replace the fish..."

"That's fine with me, but how good are you at breathing underwater?"
 
Depends on the person and depends on the fish!
If they have a HUGE attachment to it, either 3 or 4.
4 only if it's a cheap replacement!
If it is basically a decoration, I'd probably do 2.

Lol, I love the transparency of, "only if it's a cheap replacement!"

Honesty -- and frugality -- are very good signs of a great personality! :LOL:
 
Answer #2 for reasons already stated. If the little guy died from my malfeasance, I would openly acknowledge my error. I would willingly replace the fish if the owner greed.

Yeah, I wouldn't be able to live down the guilt very well if poor little Swimmers met a terrible demise due to my own ineptitude.

I have to stand in agreement with any fellow peeps who would want to at least try to provide a new friend. :)
 
Answer #2 for reasons already stated. If the little guy died from my malfeasance, I would openly acknowledge my error. I would willingly replace the fish if the owner greed.

Ooops, I made an error and gave a bad response. Leviticus 12:18 states, " Anyone who takes the life of someone’s animal must make restitution". If I caused the death of the fish, I owe the owner more than its value. I would seek to reimburse him in any way I can.
 
Ooops, I made an error and gave a bad response. Leviticus 12:18 states, " Anyone who takes the life of someone’s animal must make restitution". If I caused the death of the fish, I owe the owner more than its value. I would seek to reimburse him in any way I can.


+10 Bonus Points for using an appropriate Scripture to back your stance!!! ⭐💪🏆🥇

Kudos to @Seeker47! :cool:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Snackersmom
I would call them and tell them. Option 1 is the most moral and the most logical of all the choices on the basis of Duty and Integrity. It's implied that part of your duty besides just overseeing the fish is to inform the owner of something drastic happening and the death of the fish would constitute the most drastic and extreme thing that could happen. This option is the most uncomfortable for you, but it is also the most honest and gives the owner the truth as soon as possible. Thus your integrity to the owner is maintained by telling the owner the truth promptly and this gives the owner the most options of how they want to emotionally handle the death of the fish as well as the terms of your duty based upon the new information (the death of the fish.)

By comparison to the other options; option 2 sounds well-intentioned but is subtly deceptive. In other words by waiting for them to return you're trying to deceive them so you can ostensibly make the full amount of money for working the full week rather than just partially or risk being terminated and unpaid totally. It is also emotionally manipulative since it's really more about mollycoddling your own ego than really caring about the feelings of the fish owner. You're not really trying to spare their feelings, you're really trying to spare your own and minimize your accountability by purposefully withholding the truth. This is the option that is both irresponsible and deceptive and thus fails both your duty as well as ruins your integrity with the owner.
3 is a good option but it's not my responsibility to buy you new fish, you have to kinda face the facts that fish are mortal. In the original scenario without plot twists it's not like I killed your fish, when you hired me there was an implicit understanding that the fish could die under my watch even if I take good care of it. The reason this fails against option 1 is if you don't tell the owner promptly then you have failed your duty which is to notify the owner promptly, but this isn't as evil as option 2 because at least you maintained your integrity by trying to offer restitution. This is the option that will be chosen by either a well-intentioned person (in case of accidental death) or a genuinely remorseful person (in the scenario they caused the fish death.) Thus this option is sound in maintaining your integrity to the owner at the minimum, and if taken in tandem with option 1 maintains both your duty and integrity, making this choice a solid runner-up with conditions based on the plot twists.
4 is definitely the fishiest option and is easily the most evil, you're actively attempting to deceive the person, and it is doubly worse in the sub-scenario that you caused the fish to die. You would be better off just confessing the truth as soon as possible (option 1) rather than jumping through elaborate hoops in an attempt to deceive the person. If you had just told them the truth promptly you could have then offered option 3 as restitution, but your integrity is way out of whack because you took it upon yourself to assume what the owner wants and then attempted to deceive them on this basis. This then becomes even more absurd of a choice due to the plot twist variable chance of even being able to successfully deceive them (ie: if the fish is highly specialized, the deception will be quickly detected and your integrity is totally trashed at that point.) Similar to option 2 you have totally failed your duty and also completely trashed your integrity, but in a more overt way which makes this solidly the worst option.

In conclusion option 1 is the superior choice overall because it fulfills your duty and maintains your integrity to the fish owner. In the plot twist that your actions caused the fish to die then option 1 and option 3 taken together is the best choice since by taking option 1 you're giving the owner the truth promptly (fulfilling your duty) and option 3 is an offer of restitution to make up for your direct failure to care for the fish. Option 1 by itself or in tandem with option 3 in addition to providing accountability also gives the owner the ability to make choices based on full knowledge of the truth (fulfilling your integrity to the owner). Option 2 and 4 are both evil options as both constitute a failure of your duty and on top of this go the extra mile to attempt to deceive and emotionally manipulate the fish owner for your own selfish motives (money, your ego, your emotions, etc.) Thus options 2 and 4 are both a failure of your duty and are a breach of your integrity to the owner. Regardless of the plot twist sub-scenarios option 1 will always be the superior option.

Bonus point: If you can't read this all congratulations you are proof that the average modern adult only has an 8 second attention span, which is literally less than that of a goldfish so technically speaking the goldfish has a better ability to understand this abstract thought experiment than the average modern adult.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tall_Timbers
Depends on the person and depends on the fish! If they have a HUGE attachment to it, either 3 or 4. 4 only if it's a cheap replacement! If it is basically a decoration, I'd probably do 2.

Lol, I love the transparency of, "only if it's a cheap replacement!" Honesty -- and frugality -- are very good signs of a great personality! :LOL:

I probably wouldn’t want to watch them in the first place. I might have to pull a Wanda to get out of it: https://share.google/images/IOTuNS25kiCrDqnF4

Maybe there are some cases where there's such a thing as being just a little TOO honest... :oops::LOL::cool:
 
  • Like
Reactions: PennEd
Hey Everyone,

I have to admit I haven't had the mental energy to write many threads completely from scratch lately, so I've been "digging into the archives" of threads that have been run before -- but are always fun to ask the current audience.

This thread is a bit of an experiment. After spending some time talking with chat friends about the results of various existing personality tests, I was thinking about some of the "Getting to Know You" threads we've had on the forum over the years.

I thought it might be interesting to expand upon that and find out a little bit more about each other's personalities. However, instead of answering 500 rounds of ambiguous questions and statements such as, "I am generally sometimes but not always most definitely a positively positive person," how about if we try seeing how people say they would respond to various situations instead?

I originally had ideas for 3 different situations for people to answer, but I'm going to try just this one story line first and will see how it goes.

I last ran this idea in 2020 so yes, I apologize to all the old timers out there, you have definitely seen this before. But perhaps in that time, your answers have changed?! :LOL:

And please don't let a re-run stop you from joining the fun and answering again, if you so desire! It's always fun to see how the current crowd (whether new or long-time members) will answer -- and how everyone interacts with each one another. (Will anyone be cancelled for, gasp, providing any non-socially acceptable answers?!)

So here's the situation:

* You have been asked to look after your friend's beloved pet goldfish for a week. During the time this little finned fiend is under your care, it sadly passes on to a much bigger pond (presumably in heaven.)

Do you:

1. Call or text to let your friend know right away!

2. Wait until your friend gets back, because you don't want to ruin their vacation.

3. Offer to buy your friend a new fish regardless of when you leak the bad news.

4. Remove the evidence, get a new fish, place it in the bowl and let it happily swim free as if nothing happened -- completely passing off this new fish as your friend's original -- and letting your friend believe THIS is his treasured aquatic companion.

PLOT TWISTS:

* If choosing answer #4, would you be more or less tempted to try to pass off a new fish as the old one if the fish were all one color and easy to replace? What would you do if said fish had unique colors or markings and would be impossible to duplicate?

* What if the fish died... Because you forgot to feed it? Would you confess this to your friend, or pretend you had no idea why the poor little guy didn't make it? (Maybe even dump out some of the fish food left for Finny in order to hide the evidence, making it look like you had actually fed him?!)

Feel free to choose any answers that apply, and tell us WHY you would choose those answers (in other words... we want to know if you would admit to it! And then why, or why not?!) These answers are not absolute, of course -- feel free to give us your own version of how you would handle it. Answers can be both humorous or serious, as long as they're honest! :)

And no worries about being analyzed -- it's going to be interesting enough just reading people's answers. :)
This might be my last post for a bit.
This is a tough choice, it depends on the person I'm looking after it for. If it's someone who I'm confident could bear the loss and not let it get in the way of their vacation, I'd do 1. But otherwise, I'd pick 2.
And if the fish was a component in a broader circuit, like an aquarium, or some fish-activated electrical device, I'd do 3.
I'd only over do 4 if there was no emotional attatchment in the case of picking 3, in which case I wouldn't be tempted to pass it off as the original.

Yes I would have to confess how it died if it's my fault, because if I don't do it myself, God would do it for me, which would likely be the worse-case scenario however it happens.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Snackersmom
I wouldn't be real excited about watching someone's goldfish. After being asked to do this favor I would tell them that I never had a goldfish that lived longer than a week so if they still want me to do the favor, they'll have to agree not to hold me responsible in the event their goldfish perishes under my care. If they are foolish enough to have me watch their goldfish and the little thing dies under my watch, my response would either be one or two, depending on which the fish owner said they preferred when I asked them if they would want to know right away or find out after their return if their little buddy passed.