When I started this thread, I was thinking of my own life, true; but I'm also thinking about the younger people, wondering if they might be facing the same questions. People have added some good thoughts in these first 2 pages. I had supposed, like in most other things, that while each situation and individual is unique, there might be some general principles, and it was good to hear the perspectives.
It might have started with a random comment months back from an acquaintance who referenced a "date" as "dinner and a movie." I frankly liked the definition above better (about keeping track of refrigerated items)! It points to whether someone has the best interest of others in mind. I had wondered whether the tradition of dinner and a movie was a test of courtesy and provision. It would support the traditional view that men bring home the venison and know how to make it into dinner and it would provide an environment where both people could see how the other responds in social settings or while being served, like Lynx pointed out. It also would point to a person's basic temperament (are they adventurous and try the fancy food?), what their general likes are (or do they have dietary restrictions?), and even whether they are extravagant or frugal. All this data can be had for the price of dinner out. As to the "movie" part, I suppose it could trigger conversation about the movie and how the person pays attention and reacts to the plot, and one could find out if the other has the (either welcome or annoying) habit of talking during the movie.
I may have even asked the question realizing that although I may pass the dinner test, I might utterly fail the movie test.
Dinner: I have reasonable manners, simple tastes, a frugal approach, and can communicate what I prefer and request correction nicely when an error happens. I have had several family members who were servers, so those happy family thoughts motivate my communication with the servers as well as my tendency to tip their service generously. I feel confident that I can get through dinner without raising concern, as long as I don't spill the water, unless the other person insists that I be adventurous and try the crab soup. Nope, ain't happening, but I'll say it nicely.
Movies: It's hard to catch the story on the big screen. But once I catch it, I have to figure out what to do with it. I closely associate entertainment with learning. Without learning from the story, it would seem useless to waste time sitting there watching it. We believers are familiar with how we use the Bible stories to moralize, and this work nicely in sermons. It worked nicely for Jesus when He spoke in parables. It also seemed important when my kids and I would talk about movies after seeing them back in the olden days before I got so old. But many people find the same tendency to discuss the story in terms of godly choices, to show how those choices would have made for a better outcome, to be downright annoying. Granted, godly lives don't make for drama and intrigue in most cases, but the other person might think that entertainment is for relaxation, and analyzing takes effort.
I liked the comment that pointed out that we can only choose from the pool of people we know or know about. That is an advantage for the smaller-town people and those in certain church groups, to help funnel like-minded people into proximity, folks whose works are known, so it makes it easier to feel confident that the "talk" matches the "walk."
I may need help with putting the next question into something coherent that others can respond to. I'm curious what you look for and how you would set up a scenario where you could gather the data needed to ascertain compatibility, especially if community or church haven't produced any reasonable applicants for the job of Spouse. When I ask it that way, it sounds calculating, but in some ways, the calculating part is important, but I don't want to miss out on the human part. When I consider that what we write will be out here should younger people search, we might be providing wisdom in our common human experiences, and that seems a good thing.
(I haven't figured out how to partially quote from the thread, as you can see. Bear with me.)