Thanks for underlining the marriage of the HS & GW that should not be divorced as our discussion progresses.
There are different directions discussion can take, but whichever way it goes from here, we will try to be sure that all
relevant Biblical teaching is included, such as the Galatians 5 passage.
In discussing spiritual dynamics, it seems logical to begin with when the HS indwells believers, which is when a sinner learns the NT Gospel of Christ, repents and confesses Jesus as Lord (
Acts 20:21,
Rom. 10:9). At that moment the Holy Spirit (HS) enters the convert’s heart (
Rom. 5:5), uniting them with God as heavenly Father (
Rom. 8:9) and identifying them with Christ’s worldwide/catholic body or church (
Col. 1:18), which moment is called spiritual rebirth (
John 3:3-8) or
“baptism by the Spirit” (
1Cor. 12:13).
Confusion may arise from the fact that Paul says there is only one baptism (
Eph. 4:5), but elsewhere the NT seems to refer to two types of baptism: one by water and another by the HS (
Matt. 3:11,
John 1:26-33,
Acts 1:5). We have seen confusion regarding baptism displayed in CC threads, so we need to proceed from this point very carefully and with open minds. One view based mainly on Matt. 28:19 and Acts 2:38 is that water baptism (WB) is required for salvation, and the other view based on most of the NT (such as Matt. 3:11, Acts 1:5 and Romans 3:21-5:1) is that WB is a rite which symbolizes Spirit baptism (SB). Thus, the question and need is: What is the best way to harmonize these Scriptures instead of engaging in double-think?
IMO, any confusion is resolved by understanding that
the two types of baptism are harmonized if baptism with water is viewed as a symbolic way of portraying baptism by the HS. (Most Bibles have a footnote for
Mark 16:9-20 saying that the passage is not a reliable or well-attested part of the NT canon, so it is problematic to cite v.16 as requiring water baptism for salvation along with drinking poison or handling asps as signs of being saved.)
Both
outward confession and water baptism may be seen as works manifesting love for God that every new Believer will want to (but we cannot say “must”) perform as soon as possible following his/her decision to have saving faith (cf.
Matt. 3:13-15,
Acts 2:38). Paul referred to the comparable moment for Abraham as spiritual circumcision. Although Paul did not command baptism, he administered it (in
Acts 16:33,
18:8,
19:5 &
1Cor. 1:114-16) even though he said Christ did not send him to baptize but to preach the gospel (
1Cor. 1:17). IOW, Paul’s focus was on preaching (spirit baptism) and he probably left the water baptizing to his assistants.
What do y'all think (based on GW) about this issue?