Can We Really Exercise Free Will?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Cameron? Is this how you think about God is under no obligation?

God so hated the world, that he grudgingly gave His uniquely begotten Son,
so whoever is willing to give it a shot, should not perish, even though God
knows that one who believes could turn out to be a pain in the donkey.

God needs no obligation to man.

"Whoever does not love does not know God, because God is love. " 1 John 4:8 v​

Love is God's nature!
Not something he simply feels.

"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him
should not perish but have eternal life"
God is obligated to love!



Sovereign love is the obligation!
God was obligated to mankind to provide salvation? If so, who obligated Him?
 
Empirically in the sense of observation (and not experience which is also empirical)? What do you think he observed or what other sense of empirical are you suggesting?

Some think this is more than experience and that this concept of knowledge is about autonomy, for example, being the determiner of good and evil, like God, not unlike Satan suggested and seems to think he is.
Don't really want to go down the empirical road with you, but the autonomy angle I hadn't considered. It's easy to show that there is a lawgiver who has the right to determine good and evil.
 
So, Cain came into this world as an amoral being: He was neither good or evil, even though he belonged to Satan?

Is Cain another another one of your superheroes in Genesis? Maybe Abel got his brother's nose and ticked him off good and that isn't recorded in scripture. Maybe Cain is actually the victim in the story. :rolleyes:


No unbeliever is owned by Satan.
No more than some punk kid who knows how to hot wire, owns the car he takes control of.

Satan just knows how to hot wire unbelievers.
But he does not own them!

The Lord owns even the unbeliever, to do with him as He will.

That Lord's ownership was made officially known because Jesus died for the whole world!
Not, just for those who believe!​


"And He Himself is the propitiation for our sins, and not
for ours only but also for the whole world."


1 John 2:2


All souls are His!


“Behold, all souls are Mine;
The soul of the father
As well as the soul of the son is Mine;
The soul who sins shall die.


Ezekiel 18:4


We need to learn to outgrow our old defenses of ego we learned growing up with.

For whoever desires to save his life will lose it,
but whoever loses his life for My sake will find it."


Matthew 16:25


.

.
 
Don't really want to go down the empirical road with you, but the autonomy angle I hadn't considered. It's easy to show that there is a lawgiver who has the right to determine good and evil.

Fair enough. I actually was just asking a question not intending to get too involved either. Empirical can be experiential, so you could have experiential before the fall and after the fall. So just wondering how you're using empirical.
 
Fair enough. I actually was just asking a question not intending to get too involved either. Empirical can be experiential, so you could have experiential before the fall and after the fall. So just wondering how you're using empirical.
Empirical may have been a poor choice of words. What I was attempting to convey was that we can have an understanding of a concept in our minds that doesn't come from actually experiencing a thing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jackson129
There is no mention of salvation for angels in scripture. It has to be assumed.

There is one passage where Paul says "dont you know that we will judge angels" so it can be assumed there is some kind of process going on. If they were dammed for rebellion or saved for not rebelling would there be a trial? Or is the judging process for conviction only? Interesting thoughts.
 
So, Cain came into this world as an amoral being: He was neither good or evil, even though he belonged to Satan?

Is Cain another another one of your superheroes in Genesis? Maybe Abel got his brother's nose and ticked him off good and that isn't recorded in scripture. Maybe Cain is actually the victim in the story. :rolleyes:
Hey Rufus....your slip is showing.....

[Heb 5:14 KJV]
But strong meat belongeth to them that are of full age, [even] those who by reason of use have their senses exercised to discern both good and evil.

[2Pe 2:14 KJV]
Having eyes full of adultery, and that cannot cease from sin; beguiling unstable souls: an heart they have exercised with covetous practices; cursed children:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kroogz
Everything I wrote was counter to the rationale is that not up front. And I don't ask questions that I'm not interested in the answer. That doesn't mean I have to agree with it.

In your dreams mate. Nothing you said countered anything. You simply made a claim with nothing, including reasoning, to back it up.
 
There is one passage where Paul says "dont you know that we will judge angels" so it can be assumed there is some kind of process going on. If they were dammed for rebellion or saved for not rebelling would there be a trial? Or is the judging process for conviction only? Interesting thoughts.

The appeal trial is on now. The original trial occurred before our creation (age).
 
  • Like
Reactions: cv5
God is under no obligation to give anyone the opportunity for salvation.

That is not true, He is under obligation to Himself for He promised before time He would share His eternal life.

Titus 1:2
in the hope of eternal life that God, who never lies, promised before the ages began
 
  • Like
Reactions: studier
That is not true, He is under obligation to Himself for He promised before time He would share His eternal life.

Titus 1:2
in the hope of eternal life that God, who never lies, promised before the ages began
He obligates Himself to keep His promise to the elect, but He is under no obligation to save or even offer salvation to everyone. Neither was He obligated to make such a promise. It was all done sovereignly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Komentaja
There are elect angels but not elect people? And what is it that makes some of them elect?

Who said there are not elect people? I believe in Election, I disagree it is God choosing who will believe. For the angels, their election God stipulated no sin, for us He stipulates believe His word, Christ is the word.

What makes for election is meeting God's requirements.
 
He obligates Himself to keep His promise to the elect, but He is under no obligation to save or even offer salvation to everyone. Neither was He obligated to make such a promise. It was all done sovereignly.

There is no elect written in the verse. You are adding things based on your understanding, not on what the word says.
 
There is no elect written in the verse. You are adding things based on your understanding, not on what the word says.
The promise is to those whose names are written in the book of life before the foundation of the world...the elect.
 
What verse of scripture teaches that God is obligated to save someone?
Any "Whosoever believes" Verse.

Dad? Yes?

How can I be saved?

God is not obligated to save anyone son. In fact, you are in darkness that can't be overcome. Don't believe those freewillers, you don't stand a chance at believing the Gospel.......God might save you, your chances are slim though.....According to the calvies.