Weighing in only on Mark16:16, why would someone be baptized if they don't believe? IOW, it seems obvious that baptism doesn't need to be stated in the second clause - no belief so no baptism - but the first clause remains.
Babys are baptized.....
Weighing in only on Mark16:16, why would someone be baptized if they don't believe? IOW, it seems obvious that baptism doesn't need to be stated in the second clause - no belief so no baptism - but the first clause remains.
What difference?by command or tradition?
What difference?
They are not saved for being baptized.
Were you commanded to be baptized by the Spirit?
I did not even know it was happening to me!
Sorry. My system is glitching.
Not in Genesis 3; that's the covenant of grace. Do you see any place in Genesis 1 and 2 where God enters into an agreement with Adam?
Did you read Hosea 6:7 that @Magenta posted?No, I do not. Again the word covenant is not mentioned in those chapters. So how do you know that God made a covenant if it’s not stated somewhere? I think you are PRESUMING TO ASSUME.
God tells us “If anyone speaks, let him speak as the oracles of God. 1 Peter 4:11. I googled the expression “oracles of God” and it came up, words of God. So I want to see God’s words where it says “this is a covenant” or I am making a covenant” or I made a covenant.”something that tells us it IS a covenant—not something that you ASSUME is a covenant.
Hello grateful;
Here are words of Jesus that answers your questions;
Jhn 6:35 And Jesus said unto them, I am the bread of life: he that cometh to me shall never hunger; and he that believeth on me shall never thirst.
Jhn 6:36 But I said unto you, That ye also have seen me, and believe not.
Jhn 6:37 All that the Father giveth me shall come to me; and him that cometh to me I will in no wise cast out.
Jhn 6:38 For I came down from heaven, not to do mine own will, but the will of him that sent me.
Jhn 6:39 And this is the Father's will which hath sent me, that of all which he hath given me I should lose nothing, but should raise it up again at the last day.
Jhn 6:40 And this is the will of him that sent me, that every one which seeth the Son, and believeth on him, may have everlasting life: and I will raise him up at the last day.
Peace
Weighing in only on Mark16:16, why would someone be baptized if they don't believe? IOW, it seems obvious that baptism doesn't need to be stated in the second clause - no belief so no baptism - but the first clause remains.
In Genesis 2:16 – God tells Adam that He has provided for all his needs, that he can enjoy everything except fruit from the tree of knowledge. This was the promise of God, (a covenant promise of sorts) – so long as Adam obeyed!Do you believe God entered into a covenant with Adam?
Did you read Hosea 6:7 that @Magenta posted?
He also told him to be fruitful and multiply and exercise dominion over creation, but the only command with consequences was the one you posted.In Genesis 2:16 – God tells Adam that He has provided for all his needs, that he can enjoy everything except fruit from the tree of knowledge. This was the promise of God, (a covenant promise of sorts) – so long as Adam obeyed!
16 And the Lord God commanded the man, saying, “Of every tree of the garden you may freely eat; 17 but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat, for in the day that you eat of it you shall surely die.”
It is really bad when you feel the need to pick out a single word covenant to argue that no promise was made!He also told him to be fruitful and multiply and exercise dominion over creation, but the only command with consequences was the one you posted.
Hosea 6:7 establishes that there was a covenant between God and Adam. But you were the one who defined a covenant as an agreement. And it's easy enough to establish from the early chapters of Genesis that such an agreement was made.No, I have been discussing with YOU not her. But what about what WE HAVE discussed ? What about those chapters in Genesis that do not even mention the word covenant? What about scripture for your statement that God and Jesus have a covenant? I think it is clear that you have no scripture to support your teaching. 1 Thess. 2:13 Paul said that He rejoiced because when the Thessalonians heard what Paul preached they welcomed it as the WORD OF GOD and Not THE WORD OF MEN. We are not to be deceived by the words of men. If you can’t back up your teaching with sound words from God then I have no choice but to reject your words as the words and teachings of men and not from God.
Unreal how they go on and on denying what is clearly written while insisting calling it the words of men.Hosea 6:7 establishes that there was a covenant between God and Adam. But you were the one who defined a covenant
as an agreement. And it's easy enough to establish from the early chapters of Genesis that such an agreement was made.
Does it seem obvious that we can be poisoned with no ill effects?
Why do none of the epistles command water baptism if it is of salvific importance?
Does it seem obvious that we can be poisoned with no ill effects?
Why do none of the epistles command water baptism if it is of salvific importance?