Aw, big let down. I thought you were going to explain why God created angels with the ability to reproduce
Are giants the offspring of angels and humans?
- Thread starter Hakawaka
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Aw, big let down. I thought you were going to explain why God created angels with the ability to reproduce
So you can admit that male was made first, and the woman subsequently taken out of what man was originally?
I am honestly saying Eve was removed from/made out of Adam. Isn't that what the text says?
No, you have taken some grains of ideas that are in Scripture, conflated them with unwarranted assumptions and extra-biblical notions, and then claimed that the result is biblical. When you do that and claim that you are “sticking exactly with scripture”, you are not telling the truth.
He is dishonest. Getting people to admit what is and what is not written is like pulling teeth. Very odd.
Yep, Adam was made a male. God took a rib from Adam and formed Eve, a female. And?
And what is your problem with that? Eve, the woman, was formed from out of what the original man was.
Slander? I believe that God has preserved his words in a book, the KJV, and that's slander? Who gets ridiculed the most for being a bible believer? Me and all the other KJV believers. That's a fact!
All humans are called men in the Bible. KJV especially. That includes women in the classification of man.
Adam would seem to have originally been hermaphrodite.
Since Eve was taken out of him...
He brother, I hear what you're saying and have been reading along for a while now. I understand what you're saying, and we both understand what Christrose is saying, and you guys aren't buying what the other is selling. Now it's just stuck in this endless circle. I've had the same thing happen to me so many times here and just got to the point that I don't feel it's even fruitful anymore to do this. I was walking around not long ago listening to His word and got to Titus. This helped me with this problem and I hope it does you as well.
Titus 3: 9-11
9 But avoid foolish controversies and genealogies and arguments and quarrels about the law, because these are unprofitable and useless. 10 Warn a divisive person once, and then warn them a second time. After that, have nothing to do with them. 11 You may be sure that such people are warped and sinful; they are self-condemned.
I only shared this because I know how easy it is to get stuck in these things, and for my point of view don't see you convincing them.
Yes, I can read and I know what I said. I did not however claim that God made Adam an hermaphrodite
Do all KJ onlyists have such difficulty reading what is plainly stated?
Were giantism merely genetic, then modern “giants” would not descend from “normal-sized” parents. Robert Wadlow’s parents weren’t giants; his case is an anomaly. I suspect therefore that the giantism noted in Scripture had a different cause; Goliath had brothers who were also giants.
Wisdom brother, thanks.
4 Answer not a fool according to his folly, lest thou also be like unto him.
5 Answer a fool according to his folly, lest he be wise in his own conceit.
K
keepingthingsreal
Guest
I hear you. I have already put him on ignore, so you won't see anymore back and forth between us. Quite frankly, I stuck around this thread longer than I normally would, and that was more for the potential sakes of lurkers than those who have been engaged in the conversation.