And yet the prophecy concerning the Messiah included the Gentiles which happened later.Many followed but only those who were chosen remained. Twelve Disciples,twelve tribes of Israel.
Matthew 15
4He answered, “I was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.”
I know. Their position is untenable, but they may never see how they make themselves equal with Christ'sOf course, freewillers will predictably answer "yes" to all the above questions since their "freewill" is powerful and effectual!
But I do want to make a few observations about your last question that is alluding to Eph 2:5, which absolutely demolishes FWT!
We mustn't forget that freewillers vehemently insist that the new birth, spiritual resurrection, circumcision of the heart, the gift of the Holy Spirit, the gift of the new heart, etc. all occur AFTER a sinner initiated his own salvation by loving and electing God first, repenting and believing the Gospel. THEN God reacts afterwards by providing all the spiritual "perks" I mentioned and more. But...not according to Paul! If FWT were biblical, Paul could have never written what he did! He would have had to have said something along these lines, "God made us alive...after we believed and were still dead in our sins".
The second thing that is worthy of attention is that if the Ephesians had been raised up after they came to faith and repentance, then this implies that they overcame the power of death by themselves by their acts of repentance and faith, which would make the idea of a follow-up resurrection by God anti-climatic, absurd, useless and meaningless. Why would God need to raise them up, since WHEN they were still in their dead state, the sovereign power of their own 'freewill" freed them from the power of their spiritual state of death? In fact, they overcame the power of the Evil One who holds the power of death and did only what Jesus could do (Heb 2:14)! They themselves overcame the power of Satan and death and the evidence of this is that the "GOOD" soil of their own "GOOD" hearts produced the GOOD fruit of faith and repentance. This must be the case, since Jesus did teach that bad trees cannot produce good fruit (Mk 7:18)! Therefore, why would God need to add any spiritual "perks" whatsoever to people who already had good hearts that were able to bear the good fruit of repentance and faith?
The third noteworthy observation is that Paul clearly equates the Ephesians' spiritual resurrection with God's effectual grace with this last clause in v.5: "...it is by grace you have been saved". He gives zero credit to the Ephesians' faith and repentance as the reason or impetus for God's grace. Grace can never be Grace if the reason for Grace is ever found in the recipients' hearts or actions; for then God would in fact be rewarding or repaying them for their good deeds of faith and repentance. He would in fact be reciprocating favor upon them for the "favor" they first displayed toward Him! (As I have often said: In FWT, salvation is reduced to a quid pro quo business-type arrangement: Man must first do his part before God can do his. God is reduced to merely man's co-worker in his salvation! But this theory runs counter to numerous scriptures, including all the unilateral New Covenant promises.) Therefore, God's grace is indeed effectual because HIS power alone raised the Ephesians from their spiritual tombs! They had as much to do with their own spiritual resurrection as Lazarus had with his own physical resurrection! Lazarus was raised up by the power of Jesus' effectual grace; and so, too, were the Ephesians!
The WORD made flesh.If you accept that Jesus was The Word ,God,made flesh then you must agree Jesus didn't ask that question of his Disciples because He didn't know the answer.
Jesus said He chose the Disciples. That they didn't choose Him.
He didn't say that to those others who left Him later. God does not waste His time.
I see Jesus' asking the Disciples that question as a test. Not because He didn't already know the answer but because He wanted them to ponder the depths of their convictions to Him and His ministry.
Another quote. Lets put this DEAD theology into ACTION.....
"My parents used to say 'even the cutest baby is a dirty rotten sinner.' It was somewhat of a joke in our family, but also definitely what we all believed. I’m turning 30 this year and I still have trouble turning down the volume on this narrative about myself. It has led to issues in my friendships, with my partner, and now, with my parents... I have deconstructed to the [point] of agnosticism... This has crippled my emotional growth as an adult in ways..." (foreverlanding)
Luke 24 (NET)
44 Then he said to them, “These are my words that I spoke to you while I was still with you, that everything written about me in the law of Moses and the prophets and the psalms must be fulfilled.” 45 Then he opened their minds so they could understand the scriptures, 46 and said to them, “Thus it stands written that the Christ would suffer and would rise from the dead on the third day, 47 and repentance for the forgiveness of sins would be proclaimed in his name to all nations,beginning from Jerusalem. 48 You are witnesses of these things. 49 And look, I am sending you what my Father promised. But stay in the city until you have been clothed with power from on high.”
Those are examples of his politics Not his Hermeneutics or Soteriology.
I find Mr.Anderson to be an affront to the calling of pastoral office.
Besides denying the Holocaust ,and laying blame for much of the worlds troubles at the feet of Jews he claims repentance is not part of our Salvation. He insists repentance is a work.
He also claims Christians who do not love God still go to Heaven. I find that one of his many teachings to be quiet the conundrum.
He also teaches the Matthew 24 Olivet Discourse applies to the end times.
Just a few of his claims that I find concerning.
You don't get it.
Maybe later you will understand.
No more male or female in Christ ...
Meaning?
All are now equal before the Lord.
Prior to the Church age?
Men in Israel had privileges that the women were denied.
It was the males who had to present the blood of atonement.
Not women.
Now all believers are free to present the blood of Christ when needed.
No more male or female in that sense.
But as far as gender?
God created our souls to be male or female, in Genesis 1:27.
So God created [bara] man in his own image,in the image of God he created him;
male and female he created them.'
What was created means created "out from nothing." [bara]
Were created, either male or female souls.
In contrast to creation of the souls...
The bodies for those souls were not created out from nothing.
But, the Hebrew says they were molded and formed (yatsar) from the elements of the soil.
In the resurrection the resurrection body of the female will be for her female soul.
And, likewise for the male who is resurrected. His body will be for his male soul!
Yes!
There will still be male and females.
For both were created in God's image!
grace and peace ..........
No He said the Father gave Him all but He said only whoever comes He will never cast out.
Oh, we have been told that God acting unilaterally makes Him an unjust tyrant violating people'sWait a minute! He effectually opened their minds? I hope he asked their permission first, otherwise he would have been treating them as wind-up toy robots.![]()
The Father only gives the Son those whom the Father was able to draw to Himself. John 6:35-44
If it were not about free will?
That Father would skip the drawing part.
Why draw them then if no free will?
Romans 1:18-25 even speaks of some who rejected God's drawing.
God punished them for it!
.......
Oh, we have been told that God acting unilaterally makes Him an unjust tyrant violating people's
free will and making a hoax of repentance and salvation. In fact the same person claimed people
believe God raped Mary rather than admit he was wrong about Mary being asked, and giving her consent.
Some say the most blasphemous things and misrepresent what others believe by lying their faces off,
then try to fool everyone into accepting that they are promoters of truth.
Yes, it does seem inevitable that at the root of all this promotion of free will nonsense and rejectingThe inevitable result of self-deception induced by the number one sin in all scripture: PRIDE!
Abraham sacrificing Isaac after the Flood. Then Passover in Egypt. Then the sacrificing in the Law.
But in that portion of Scripture it's not mentioned.
Yes, Jesus ALWAYS knew the outcome of EVERY scenario, as He knows all things, and exists outside of time while simultaneously being inside of time as well. Factor this in and much confusion.......melts away.The WORD made flesh.
Of course Jesus asked already knowing the results and outcome.
I find it interesting that in John 15 Jesus tells his Disciples they did not choose him. Jesus chose them.
I am fond of this site because it is linked to the only Topical Scripture Search Site that I have been able to find and that has other study resources available as well.
I've linked Chapter 15 here.
And at verse 16 you'll see the footnote sn that I copied and posted below.
16 You did not choose me, but I chose you[ap] and appointed you to go and bear[aq] fruit, fruit that remains,[ar] so that whatever you ask the Father in my name he will give you.
Footnote
sn You did not choose me, but I chose you. If the disciples are now elevated in status from slaves to friends, they are friends who have been chosen by Jesus, rather than the opposite way round. Again this is true of all Christians, not just the twelve, and the theme that Christians are “chosen” by God appears frequently in other NT texts (e.g., Rom 8:33; Eph 1:4ff.; Col 3:12; and 1 Pet 2:4). Putting this together with the comments on 15:14 one may ask whether the author sees any special significance at all for the twelve. Jesus said in John 6:70 and 13:18 that he chose them, and 15:27 makes clear that Jesus in the immediate context is addressing those who have been with him from the beginning. In the Fourth Gospel the twelve, as the most intimate and most committed followers of Jesus, are presented as the models for all Christians, both in terms of their election and in terms of their mission.
Yes, it does seem inevitable that at the root of all this promotion of free will nonsense and rejecting
what Scripture says of the natural man comes from their own sense of pride and being a "good person"
quite unlike the picture Scripture paints of the natural man in the very words of Jesus Christ Himself.
I have stated this many times Augustine's own self-loathing is the seed of all his bad doctrine.