Understanding God’s election

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
24,090
8,715
113
So basically they were able to believe because it was physical salvation, you are pushing this aside as an object lesson or type for believing in/trusting in Christ Jesus for salvation.

I knew there would be a catch.
Right.
A "catch" aka a "snare", a "trap", a "web".

[2Ti 2:26 KJV]
And [that] they may recover themselves out of the snare of the devil, who are taken captive by him at his will.
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
20,313
6,945
113
62
So basically they were able to believe because it was physical salvation, you are pushing this aside as an object lesson or type for believing in/trusting in Christ Jesus for salvation.

I knew there would be a catch.
Explaining something isn't pushing something aside. There is a difference between responses made from revelation outside oneself and from within oneself. That you don't understand the difference is actually sad. How can you possibly know what you are hearing comes from your natural senses or from the Holy Spirit?
 

GWH

Groovy
Oct 19, 2024
2,145
522
113
Explaining something isn't pushing something aside. There is a difference between responses made from revelation outside oneself and from within oneself. That you don't understand the difference is actually sad. How can you possibly know what you are hearing comes from your natural senses or from the Holy Spirit?
Good question, and the double check is that it jibes with GW in the NT.
 

Genez

Junior Member
Oct 12, 2017
3,555
567
113
Calvinists persist in arguing from the spiritual maternity ward.

We who believe in Jesus Christ are all saved!
Deal with it!

Now... how we got saved?

That's all they can talk about!

And they keep building themselves up in their mutual pride instead of continuous growing in grace and truth to discover
what life is to be had after being born again. What God is having in store for those who love Him!

They, in effect, become like weights on our ankles of those who walk in an ever-growing faith!
They get thrown into the expedition as to try to slow down believers on their journey into discovering
more and more of God's Truth in the frontier God places us in on earth.


They should have been left behind with the women and children.
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
24,090
8,715
113
Explaining something isn't pushing something aside. There is a difference between responses made from revelation outside oneself and from within oneself. That you don't understand the difference is actually sad. How can you possibly know what you are hearing comes from your natural senses or from the Holy Spirit?
Tell that to the Philippian jailer. He could care less about plumbing the depths of esoteric Calvinite dogma.

In fact he nor his family had time to have their brains scrambled with that sort of nonsense. And thank God for that.

[Act 16:31 NKJV]
So they said, "Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and you will be saved, you and your household."

[Act 16:33 NKJV]
And he took them the same hour of the night and washed [their] stripes. And immediately he and all his [family] were baptized.
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
20,313
6,945
113
62
Tell that to the Philippian jailer. He could care less about plumbing the depths of esoteric Calvinite dogma.

In fact he nor his family had time to have their brains scrambled with that sort of nonsense. And thank God for that.

[Act 16:31 NKJV]
So they said, "Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and you will be saved, you and your household."

[Act 16:33 NKJV]
And he took them the same hour of the night and washed [their] stripes. And immediately he and all his [family] were baptized.
You left out alot of the story. Back up and tell me what led to his question.
 

HeIsHere

Well-known member
May 21, 2022
6,520
2,553
113
There is a difference between responses made from revelation outside oneself and from within oneself.
Exactly what has been my point, regeneration (inside) does not precede belief (outside).
There is not debate on this.
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
20,313
6,945
113
62
Exactly what has been my point, regeneration (inside) does not precede belief (outside).
There is not debate on this.
Hmmm.
Jesus states that He builds His church based on the revelation of the Father as to His identity. To be saved, one must believe on the Lord Jesus Christ. This is the substance of saving faith. But you say one believes before they know what it is they are to believe. And that sounds right to you?
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
24,090
8,715
113
You left out alot of the story. Back up and tell me what led to his question.
You have something to add champ?
Well, should you CHOOSE to post further embarrassing and God-dishonoring absurdities and fallacies, have at it.
 

HeIsHere

Well-known member
May 21, 2022
6,520
2,553
113
Hmmm.
Jesus states that He builds His church based on the revelation of the Father as to His identity. To be saved, one must believe on the Lord Jesus Christ. This is the substance of saving faith. But you say one believes before they know what it is they are to believe. And that sounds right to you?
They know what to believe if they are given the true Gospel message, they either believe or they do not.

God knows why some are persuaded and some are not, we do not, so no purpose in speculating.
 

Rufus

Well-known member
Feb 17, 2024
3,329
474
83
sad, sad, sad.

You cannot even see how this view of fallen human nature you keep declaring, devoid of any ability to respond to Truth,

this Augustinian view of man's fallen nature,

makes God responsible for all evil since He is responsible for this fallen nature and all sin past, present and future.

Is He not the designer of how man is in this fallen state according to your interpretation of those out of context verses?

Can you accept that in your view God made man born a slave to sin and therefore bears the responsibility for all of man's actions?
No, it does not make God responsible! While God decreed the penalty for sin (i.e. death), He did not cause Adam to sin. Adam is fully responsible since he is the federal head of the human race, and Adam, unlike any of his progeny, was indeed completely free to choose to trust or not trust God since he was not encumbered with a sin nature or corrupt heart. UNLIKE any of us, Adam was totally free FROM sinful influences from within.

Furthermore, if you're going to blame the Doctrines of Grace for making God morally responsible for the Fall, then how does your FWT let you off the hook? God tested Adam for righteousness and he did this by sending the evil one to the planet to tempt man. Didn't God know what the outcome would be of that temptation? If so, why didn't God prevent the Fall? Wasn't he powerful enough? Wasn't he powerful enough to prevent Abimelech from violating Sarah? Since he protected Sarah against an evildoer, why didn't he protect Eve from the evil one?
 

HeIsHere

Well-known member
May 21, 2022
6,520
2,553
113
No, it does not make God responsible! While God decreed the penalty for sin (i.e. death), He did not cause Adam to sin. Adam is fully responsible since he is the federal head of the human race, and Adam, unlike any of his progeny, was indeed completely free to choose to trust or not trust God since he was not encumbered with a sin nature or corrupt heart. UNLIKE any of us, Adam was totally free FROM sinful influences from within.

Furthermore, if you're going to blame the Doctrines of Grace for making God morally responsible for the Fall, then how does your FWT let you off the hook? God tested Adam for righteousness and he did this by sending the evil one to the planet to tempt man. Didn't God know what the outcome would be of that temptation? If so, why didn't God prevent the Fall? Wasn't he powerful enough? Wasn't he powerful enough to prevent Abimelech from violating Sarah? Since he protected Sarah against an evildoer, why didn't he protect Eve from the evil one?
Did God not design/create the nature of the fallen state you adhere to? ..... or was it random consequence of which He had no knowledge?

You make inability the central reason for people not being able to respond to the Gospel message and yet you are unwilling to acknowledge that the fallen nature must also be God's design.
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
20,313
6,945
113
62
You have something to add champ?
Well, should you CHOOSE to post further embarrassing and God-dishonoring absurdities and fallacies, have at it.
I just find it odd that someone who has made numerous claims against taking individual verses out of context would make a practice of it to suit his purposes. Why leave out all the actions of God that led to that particular moment and question?
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
20,313
6,945
113
62
They know what to believe if they are given the true Gospel message, they either believe or they do not.

God knows why some are persuaded and some are not, we do not, so no purpose in speculating.
How do you know if the response is due to revelation or the result of natural understanding?
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
20,313
6,945
113
62
You present a false dichotomy.
No I don't.
You just don't like the ramifications of the argument.

Jesus clearly says that He builds His church on the basis of revelation from the Father that He is the Christ.
Individuals can come to this understanding apart from the revelation of God.
Thus, human reasoning isn't the cause of saving faith; revelation is.

The world by wisdom knows not God.
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
24,090
8,715
113
Did God not design/create the nature of the fallen state you adhere to? ..... or was it random consequence of which He had no knowledge?

You make inability the central reason for people not being able to respond to the Gospel message and yet you are unwilling to acknowledge that the fallen nature must also be God's design.
You are correct that the Calvinites to not have any such "central reason".
What they DO have is shells and peas and moving goalposts.

And boy do they have contempt and hatred for the unsaved. Their incessant Israel (elder brother) bashing is the tell.

And come to think of it what does the Scripture say about hating your brother?
 

HeIsHere

Well-known member
May 21, 2022
6,520
2,553
113
As if he acually knew one way or the other.
I mean that is what is implied in all of his posts right? His special gnosis?
It always comes back to that "special gnosis" exactly!

No power in the Gospel message in Calvinism... none.
 

HeIsHere

Well-known member
May 21, 2022
6,520
2,553
113
No I don't.
You just don't like the ramifications of the argument.

Jesus clearly says that He builds His church on the basis of revelation from the Father that He is the Christ.
Individuals can come to this understanding apart from the revelation of God.
Thus, human reasoning isn't the cause of saving faith; revelation is.

The world by wisdom knows not God.
Pray tell what is this special revelation, obviously the power and truth inherent in the revelatory Gospel message is impotent in your view?