In your opinion do you believe world is about 6000 years old

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

hornetguy

Senior Member
Jan 18, 2016
7,053
1,678
113
The other thing is that for me the Kingdom of God is here and now in my heart, so if the second Judgment comes today at 5PM or in 1.3 billions from now, I’m already in a spiritual connection with God. Short of me seeing Him or touching Him, I’m already there mentally and spiritually.
So, that’s why for me it’s hard to understand this mindset which carries a message of doom and gloom and no other instructions.
Because I don’t see doom and gloom in the second judgment, I see Relief.
Bingo.
Well said.
 

2ndTimeIsTheCharm

Well-known member
Feb 17, 2023
1,850
1,030
113
This was a good documentary and I enjoyed it.
For me this mindset is something which I can’t understand.
Ready for what exactly? That finally we will be free from this fallen world?
The other thing is that for me the Kingdom of God is here and now in my heart, so if the second Judgment comes today at 5PM or in 1.3 billions from now, I’m already in a spiritual connection with God. Short of me seeing Him or touching Him, I’m already there mentally and spiritually.
So, that’s why for me it’s hard to understand this mindset which carries a message of doom and gloom and no other instructions.
Because I don’t see doom and gloom in the second judgment, I see Relief.

You're not seeing the bigger scope. That documentary wasn't made so much for Christians who are ready for Jesus to return.

This documentary is meant more for those who don't know God and for Christians who AREN'T ready for Him. This is why the documentary is free to watch in the first place.

Until such people take heed to it's message, then it IS doom and gloom for them.

The kind of attitude toward the film, like it's not even necessary, is why I don't want to talk to any of you about it.


🎨
 

GWH

Groovy
Oct 19, 2024
527
158
43
You're not seeing the bigger scope. That documentary wasn't made so much for Christians who are ready for Jesus to return.

This documentary is meant more for those who don't know God and for Christians who AREN'T ready for Him. This is why the documentary is free to watch in the first place.

Until such people take heed to it's message, then it IS doom and gloom for them.

The kind of attitude toward the film, like it's not even necessary, is why I don't want to talk to any of you about it.


🎨
You introduce an important question: What truth is necessary and what information is not?
 

2ndTimeIsTheCharm

Well-known member
Feb 17, 2023
1,850
1,030
113
I usually try to focus on the essence than the tone. For example when the Germans say "i love you" it sounds angry to me. :ROFL:

I agree, the way German is spoken in Germany sounds practically guttural, but it actually sounds really nice in Austria. Very refined.

Austrian German vs. German German

But Hitler was Austrian, so I don't know what happened with his spoken German in his speeches. Maybe he was just really angry after all!


🎨
 

2ndTimeIsTheCharm

Well-known member
Feb 17, 2023
1,850
1,030
113
How about the appearance of no sickness before the flood-longevity of life.

What would you like to talk about that?

That made me think that when the Lord comes back and reigns in the Millennial Age, He will let us experience what it should have been like to live before the Fall. There is the issue of who survives the great tribulation and I think it might be children who haven't reached the age of accountability? So Christians who have already been transformed and became immortal can care for them and teach them to live for the Lord. Those children will still be mortal, but I think they'll have a much longer life than even the current average lifespan right now.


🎨
 

MeowFlower

Active member
Aug 25, 2024
305
144
43
In my studies I have found the world is about 6000 years old. Anyone else studied time from Adam?????
How would we know the date of Adam's creation?

I don't believe earth is 6,000 years old.

In Scotland there is the Fortingall Yew estimated to be 9000 years old. In Sweden a tree known as Old Tjikko and thought to be approximately 9,5667 years old.

In north Zambia at Columbo falls there's a 476,000 year old site being excavated by archeologists.


https://artsandculture.google.com/s...he-world-s-10-oldest-artifacts/uQWBQDrz-DI65A
 

hornetguy

Senior Member
Jan 18, 2016
7,053
1,678
113
How long were Adam and Even in the garden, before they were driven out?
 

GWH

Groovy
Oct 19, 2024
527
158
43
How long were Adam and Even in the garden, before they were driven out?
Again, what truth is necessary to learn and what information is not, although it might be interesting or helpful?
 

Moses_Young

Well-known member
Sep 15, 2019
9,929
5,500
113
How would we know the date of Adam's creation?

I don't believe earth is 6,000 years old.
We've got history that goes back that far. It's called the bible.

In Scotland there is the Fortingall Yew estimated to be 9000 years old. In Sweden a tree known as Old Tjikko and thought to be approximately 9,5667 years old.

In north Zambia at Columbo falls there's a 476,000 year old site being excavated by archeologists.
Meh. Scientists make mistakes all the time. When they bet something of worth on it (like their lives, or something similar), I might pay more attention. Until then, it's just people cherry-picking the evidence they like to support the conclusions of their sponsors. No different to the guy serving burgers at McDonald's, but the transaction is a little more complicated because there is more at stake.
 

hornetguy

Senior Member
Jan 18, 2016
7,053
1,678
113
Again, what truth is necessary to learn and what information is not, although it might be interesting or helpful?
Well, mostly to try to find an answer to the OP's question... IS the earth only 6000 years old? If scholars count the years back to the creation of Adam, and only come up with 6000 years, how are the other discoveries on the earth explained? What if Adam and Eve were in the garden for thousands of years before they fell to temptation?

We've got history that goes back that far. It's called the bible.
Except we don't know that as a certainty... see the above....
 

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
25,330
13,715
113
Well, mostly to try to find an answer to the OP's question... IS the earth only 6000 years old? If scholars count the years back to the creation of Adam, and only come up with 6000 years, how are the other discoveries on the earth explained? What if Adam and Eve were in the garden for thousands of years before they fell to temptation?


Except we don't know that as a certainty... see the above....
We know your scenario is not reality in the same way we know about Adam and Ever: from Scripture. This same Scripture tells us that Adam was only 130 years old when Seth was born and that all creation was made in six days. ;)
 

GWH

Groovy
Oct 19, 2024
527
158
43
Well, mostly to try to find an answer to the OP's question... IS the earth only 6000 years old? If scholars count the years back to the creation of Adam, and only come up with 6000 years, how are the other discoveries on the earth explained? What if Adam and Eve were in the garden for thousands of years before they fell to temptation?


Except we don't know that as a certainty... see the above....
Yes, but in order to answer the OP's question, what truth in Scripture is necessary to believe and what scientific information is necessary to know? (Cf. RM 1:20)
 

hornetguy

Senior Member
Jan 18, 2016
7,053
1,678
113
We know your scenario is not reality in the same way we know about Adam and Ever: from Scripture. This same Scripture tells us that Adam was only 130 years old when Seth was born and that all creation was made in six days. ;)
Yes.... that is what scripture says.... but when did Adam's "years" start? We assume that God's intent was that man live forever... that's why God told them to not eat of the tree of life, or the tree of knowledge of good and evil.... or on that day they would "die".... or their mortality begins...
My understanding of it is that Adam's lifespan years weren't counted until after they were banished from the garden.

IF that is indeed the case, then Adam and Eve could have been in the garden a LONG time before the temptation and fall happened.
 

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
25,330
13,715
113
Yes.... that is what scripture says.... but when did Adam's "years" start? We assume that God's intent was that man live forever... that's why God told them to not eat of the tree of life, or the tree of knowledge of good and evil.... or on that day they would "die".... or their mortality begins...
My understanding of it is that Adam's lifespan years weren't counted until after they were banished from the garden.

IF that is indeed the case, then Adam and Eve could have been in the garden a LONG time before the temptation and fall happened.
Why would you think that? Is there any Scripture supporting that idea, or is it based in pseudo-science telling us the world is much older?
 

hornetguy

Senior Member
Jan 18, 2016
7,053
1,678
113
And the 6 days of creation are absolutely true. But if you notice, God created "mankind", both male and female on the 6th day.

Gen 2 tells us of the creation of Adam... then some time later, the creation of Eve.
 

hornetguy

Senior Member
Jan 18, 2016
7,053
1,678
113
Why would you think that? Is there any Scripture supporting that idea, or is it based in pseudo-science telling us the world is much older?
Oh, come on....lighten up.... these are simply thoughts I've had, from reading in more detail the account of creation. I've wondered how to relate the account of God creating everything, to the evidence that the world could be much older than we originally thought.

There are possible "gaps" in our understanding of the timeline given us in scripture.
Is it your understanding that God created Adam on the 6th day, then there was enough time for Adam to show evidence of needing a partner, and God put him to sleep, took a rib, created woman... then later that day, God allowed the serpent to find Eve, and they were tempted, fell, and then in the cool of the evening God was walking through the garden and found out about the fall and banished them.....
ALL on the 6th day? You remember, God saw all that he had done, and it was "very good".... does that include the fall of man?

It makes much more sense to think that Adam was in the garden for some time, taking care of, and naming all the animals before God decided to create Eve.
Then Adam and Eve could have lived in the garden for quite some time, before the serpent was allowed to visit and tempt them. Remember.... the idea was that they live forever in the garden.

There is no "pseudo-science" involved.... simply my thoughts on the subject. All of my thoughts are based on the scriptural account in Genesis 1-3....

It may very well be true... your version of the creation timeline.... that is what I was taught all my life, as well. If it is truly how it happened, I have no problem with it. God chose to not give us all the "details" of what went on during creation. I'm ok with that, and my faith will not be shaken, either way. EITHER timeline has no bearing on my salvation, or yours....
 

GWH

Groovy
Oct 19, 2024
527
158
43
Re "It may very well be true... your version of the creation timeline.... that is what I was taught all my life, as well. If it is truly how it happened, I have no problem with it. God chose to not give us all the "details" of what went on during creation. I'm ok with that, and my faith will not be shaken, either way. EITHER timeline has no bearing on my salvation, or yours...."

That was why I interjected my two cents by asking "what truth is necessary to learn and what information is not, although it might be interesting or helpful?"

My answer is the necessary truth is that God created the world and humanity with God-consciousness and conscience or ability to cooperate with His will--or not. One may find the details y'all are quibbling about interesting or not, but it doesn't ultimately matter, because they are of secondary importance--as hornetguy and I trust everyone realizes.
 

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
25,330
13,715
113
Oh, come on....lighten up.... these are simply thoughts I've had, from reading in more detail the account of creation. I've wondered how to relate the account of God creating everything, to the evidence that the world could be much older than we originally thought.

There are possible "gaps" in our understanding of the timeline given us in scripture.
Is it your understanding that God created Adam on the 6th day, then there was enough time for Adam to show evidence of needing a partner, and God put him to sleep, took a rib, created woman... then later that day, God allowed the serpent to find Eve, and they were tempted, fell, and then in the cool of the evening God was walking through the garden and found out about the fall and banished them.....
ALL on the 6th day? You remember, God saw all that he had done, and it was "very good".... does that include the fall of man?

It makes much more sense to think that Adam was in the garden for some time, taking care of, and naming all the animals before God decided to create Eve.
Then Adam and Eve could have lived in the garden for quite some time, before the serpent was allowed to visit and tempt them. Remember.... the idea was that they live forever in the garden.

There is no "pseudo-science" involved.... simply my thoughts on the subject. All of my thoughts are based on the scriptural account in Genesis 1-3....

It may very well be true... your version of the creation timeline.... that is what I was taught all my life, as well. If it is truly how it happened, I have no problem with it. God chose to not give us all the "details" of what went on during creation. I'm ok with that, and my faith will not be shaken, either way. EITHER timeline has no bearing on my salvation, or yours....
I agree: this is not a salvific issue. :)

I believe that humankind was created on the 6th day, but that for a brief period, the woman was fully "in" the man's body until God withdrew and formed her. That completely avoids compressing all those actions into one day.

I don't know that it was ever God's plan for Adam and Eve to live "forever" in the garden. Instead, I believe that He fully anticipated the fall both of Lucifer and of Adam, and had in mind the redemption in Christ before the Earth was formed. Indeed, Scripture says "He was chosen before the foundation of the world" (1 Peter 1:20).
 

Inquisitor

Well-known member
Mar 17, 2022
2,820
845
113
Why would you think that? Is there any Scripture supporting that idea, or is it based in pseudo-science telling us the world is much older?
I would not be using the term 'pseudo science'.

Science is based on observation, measurement, repeatable experiments, etc.

That is the scientific methodology and it cannot be false.

Science is constantly self correcting.

There are many ways of observing the age of the earth.

Creation science is pseudo science because Creation science is not based on direct observation
nor measurements. Creation science is solely based on a genealogy given in the Old Testament.

Science is not at war with Christianity and never was.

A sect within Christianity that employs a specific interpretation of the Old Testament is at war with science.

There is a lot wrong with scientific viewpoints and especially with scientific speculation.

Personally, I put no faith in mankind in general.