It's never clear enough, brother...hope it's clear enough. lol
(Just messin' with you, brother - you threw that door wide open and I just couldn't resist.)
It's never clear enough, brother...hope it's clear enough. lol
No it doesn't. Every man is created with a spirit.That speaks of the believer. Not the psuchikos man.
Revelation 13:18, as stated in the KJV, speaks to those who already possess wisdom, implying they should have the knowledge and experience necessary to calculate a particular number—666—attached with its specific meaning. Many, perhaps including yourself, may not have delved into the study of Biblical Numerics or fully grasp how statistical probabilities work. I encourage you to explore Brandon Peterson’s recent micro-pattern series on YouTube. The patterns he reveals are far too complex to dismiss as mere coincidence. To deny the significance behind them without proper understanding is a missed opportunity for deeper insight.
Figures like Mark Ward and Jonathan Burris have tried to challenge Peterson’s findings. In a conversation I had with Burris, when I used the Bible to explain the reasoning behind Peterson’s patterns, he had no response and failed to acknowledge that my points were rooted in Scripture. As for Ward, his attempt to refute Biblical Numerics lacked depth and fell short in comparison to Peterson’s work. It seems Ward's hope is that people will trust his argument without prayerfully watching the video and genuinely seeking the truth.
Some critics of the KJV argue against its status as the perfect Word of God by pointing to the KJV preface and citing printing errors found in earlier editions. This is truly sad and shows lack of careful thought on this subject.
![]()
Would these also be your arguments against the KJV?
So you believe that that all reputable Modern Bibles are all word perfect and have no errors?
Why shouldn't we simply trust the Bible when it plainly states that God's words are perfect and will be preserved for all generations? How is it 'cultic' to believe the Bible exactly as it’s written? There’s no clear scriptural evidence that these promises refer only to doctrines or general truths. In fact, claiming they do would be a far more cultic view, since that idea isn’t found anywhere in the Bible.
Unless you believe that the NIV and NASB are completely error-free and word-perfect, they cannot be considered the authentic or true Word of God. The genuine Word of God would be holy and divine, not 'holey'—a book riddled with holes and errors.
They are not baseless. You don’t believe the KJV is the perfect and inerrant Word of God. You have a bias or preference for Modern Scholarship and Modern Bibles.
Not at all. Bart Ehrman and Rick Beckman are two individuals who have apostatized from the faith directly as a result of their involvement in Textual Criticism. This would not have happened if they simply trusted in the promises of God by faith.
When you overlook the context of Daniel 3:28, you're not fully engaging with the facts that need correction. I've been corrected by other believers on forums like this before. It’s rare, but it has happened—especially when someone points out a verse that helps me correct my understanding of another piece of Scripture. This is not to boast, but to merely encourage you to do the same.
Given our previous discussion, do you think that by not considering Daniel 3:28 as part of the context, you might be approaching this topic with a certain bias, potentially interpreting details that aren’t actually there?
This demonstrates a misunderstanding of the topic. For instance, earlier editions of the NIV describe Jesus healing a leper with compassion (Mark 1:41). However, the latest edition of the NIV now depicts Jesus healing the leper with indignation. In the context, no clear reason is given for His anger, which contradicts Jesus’ teaching in Matthew 5:22, where He warns that being angry without cause puts one in danger of judgment.
Imagine trying to use the sleep emoji to get a job interview—it probably wouldn’t go over well. Likewise, using it while attempting to impress a woman would likely make her lose interest quickly. Now think about how God feels when you show disinterest (like using a sleep emoji) during a Bible discussion. I’m not saying this to wound you, but to encourage you to grow and be better. To inspire you to be the Christian hero God calls you to be.
…
Its clear to me that every man may CHOOSE to heed God's commandThe Greek ended up being translated commonly as "natural man."
The Greek uses a word which we have derived the word "psychic, psychology, psychiatry, ...... and, soul.'
The word is psuchikos.
To the Greek reader, in the day it was written, it could have been understood to mean...
Not, natural man.
But, 'soulish man.
Some translators understanding the historical use have even went as far to translate it...
'the man without a spirit.'
The unbeliever is body and soul only.
Regeneration gives a person a human spirit, making him body, soul, and spirit.
That is why we read in 1 Thessalonians 5:23, the following.
May God himself, the God of peace, sanctify you through and through.
May your whole spirit, soul and body be kept blameless at the coming
of our Lord Jesus Christ.
The natural man is unregenerate.
No human spirit.
Only body and soul!
................... He can not know spiritual things!
grace and peace .................................
So what's in the translators Preface to the Reader Dino? ThanksYou really need to read the Translator’s Preface to the Reader. It would likely disabuse you of your idol worship.
Maybe I made a mistake in the way I characterized it. Certainly He is drawing all people to Himself. But That doesn't change the fact that the things of God are hidden from those who are without the Spirit (because it is the Spirit who reveals them).None of that supports your claim that Jesus wanted to be hidden.
Its clear to me that every man may CHOOSE to heed God's command
to seek His face, love Him, obey Him. Those commands cannot be and are not an hoax or a cruel joke.
But men CHOOSE to ignore the calling of the Holy Ghost.
And impenitence leads inexorably to this state:
Rom 1:28 - And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient;
I see no need to do your homework for you.So what's in the translators Preface to the Reader Dino? Thanks
Who gets the Spirit that gives wisdom and insight into the mind of God?Maybe I made a mistake in the way I characterized it. Certainly He is drawing all people to Himself. But That doesn't change the fact that the things of God are hidden from those who are without the Spirit (because it is the Spirit who reveals them).
No verse in all the Bible has been so horribly disfigured as this one.They are not a hoax or a cruel joke. It takes a lot of cynicism to think otherwise.
So what's in the translators Preface to the Reader Dino? Thanks
So what's in the translators Preface to the Reader Dino? Thanks
I also ENLARGED the words "the Lord" in my post.
Because that [that part] was INCLUDED in what I am pointing out about how the other words ("present" and "before"--these Hebrew words) are used (elsewhere in Scripture) to speak of HUMANS (located ON THE EARTH) are doing this.
I hoped you would yourself look that up, to SEE whether these things (I'm pointing out) ARE SO.
Of course, we all know this. But that's beside the point
(beside the point that I AM POINTING OUT, specifically.)
I'm pointing out that, the fact there is OTHER places using THESE HEBREW WORDS (I've underlined / emphasized), yet is speaking of HUMANS who are LOCATED ON THE EARTH doing this, negates your claim that this "naturally" must be the case that the place is "IN HEAVEN".
I wouldn't have brought it up, otherwise.
All I'm asking is that you CHECK IT OUT (feel free to PROVE OTHERWISE, as to what point I'm actually making... Not one I'm NOT making. haha)
Repeatedly in Job 1 & 2, the phrase "there became a day" is used (or however you want to read that phrase). I don't see any passage elsewhere in Scripture where this speaks of "[there became a day] UP IN HEAVEN". I've not seen one. Maybe you can point one out to me??
I DO see, however, that Job chapter 1, verses 4-5 (just prior to 1:6), it talks about "when the days of their feasting were finished" and how Job then "offered burnt offerings according to the number of them"... and "Thus Job did continually."
(The verses which follow aren't changing the subject ENTIRELY. Even though, as we might say, it may be starting a new "paragraph".)
Between:
Cognitive Biases
Cognitive dissonance
Reading comprehension difficulties
Language/translation difficulties
heavy Metaphoric language use
Literary license with requisite anthropology knowledge
Ancient Near East literature style
Scripture is somewhat deceptive at times. Things aren't always as plain and obvious as you would think they should be. Of course we have thousands of years of people pointing out some of these things. But that still doesn't mean that they understood what they read when they read it. Even supposed scholars get stuff wrong on a regular basis. Happens to even the best of us when facing publishing deadlines. Especially as knowledge becomes more specialized as time goes by. (Impossible to know everything)
Even though we have the scriptures translated....it's still not easy to readily understand 5700 year old Ancient Near Eastern Poetry. And even at that....it's akin to being an expert in Midievil French Renaissance Poetry....you just aren't that much fun at parties. People look at it as if it's wasted knowledge.
And ANE poetry....it's not simple or easy.
when you are praising kjv instead of praising Jesus, i really don't care how many numbers you have, your equation is unbalanced.
So either Blaney "corrected" the KJV (regardless of what corrections he made) or he did not.
You aren't going to wiggle out of this. You were careless in your choice of words, and now they are biting you in the behind. Just admit it and move on.
Bible Highlighter said:Unless you believe that the NIV and NASB are completely error-free and word-perfect, they cannot be considered the authentic or true Word of God. The genuine Word of God would be holy and divine, not 'holey'—a book riddled with holes and errors.
Where is that in Scripture? Read the 1611 Preface to the Reader. It refutes such claims quite adequately.
So either Blaney "corrected" the KJV (regardless of what corrections he made) or he did not.
You aren't going to wiggle out of this. You were careless in your choice of words, and now they are biting you in the behind. Just admit it and move on.
Psalm 12 isn't going to help you here.The words of the Lord are pure words, purified seven times.
....
Where is that in Scripture?God’s Word says the Scriptures are holy (1 Timothy 3:15).
Many covers of the Bible say, "Holy Bible."
Something that is holy from God does not have errors.