Yes, well he is like Macbeth, still trying to get the blood off his hands from 2020. but 25 was a reference to the 25th Amendment.Didn't he say 2020 or did I hear wrong?
Yes, well he is like Macbeth, still trying to get the blood off his hands from 2020. but 25 was a reference to the 25th Amendment.Didn't he say 2020 or did I hear wrong?
If you’re unable to answer my question just say so. No hard feelings.
Her issue is that Pocahontas never claimed to be a princess. You see Warren is allowed to tell us what Trump thinks, that Trump thinks he is above the law like a king or dictator.she used to claim she was of native american heritage, but turned out not to be when a d n a test was preformed.
Her issue is that Pocahontas never claimed to be a princess. You see Warren is allowed to tell us what Trump thinks, that Trump thinks he is above the law like a king or dictator.
I interpret that to mean projection. She is telling us what she thinks. But according to Susanna Warren is allowed to tell us what Trump thinks but no one is allowed to say what she thinks.
Since Pocahontas never claimed to be a princess I cannot equate her to Pocahontas.
But I disagree, I believe that as you have done it will be done to you. With what measure you measure it will be measured to you. If she feels she has the right to tell us what Trump is thinking then Trump has the right to tell us what she is thinking. That seems fair. We have listened to this claim that Trump wants to be a dictator or king now for seven years, now it is time to hear about how Warren wants to be Pocahontas.
That is a very clear answer to her question which I have said repeatedly. So now her claim that I am not answering her question is false, bordering on deceit.
Read post #321 again.I wasn’t offended about you calling out her l i e.It is far fetched that someone with as much vitriol about Trump as you and Seed_Time_harvest are now offended at calling out Warren for her lie.
Don't tell me you are not aware of Warren's fake claims about Native ancestry (not about being a princess)? This is ancient news.When did she call herself a Native American princess?
So then since she Is In your words a fraud then It’s ok to call her a racist name,right?ok got It.
Her issue is that Pocahontas never claimed to be a princess. You see Warren is allowed to tell us what Trump thinks, that Trump thinks he is above the law like a king or dictator.
I interpret that to mean projection. She is telling us what she thinks. But according to Susanna Warren is allowed to tell us what Trump thinks but no one is allowed to say what she thinks.
Since Pocahontas never claimed to be a princess I cannot equate her to Pocahontas.
But I disagree, I believe that as you have done it will be done to you. With what measure you measure it will be measured to you. If she feels she has the right to tell us what Trump is thinking then Trump has the right to tell us what she is thinking. That seems fair. We have listened to this claim that Trump wants to be a dictator or king now for seven years, now it is time to hear about how Warren wants to be Pocahontas.
That is a very clear answer to her question which I have said repeatedly. So now her claim that I am not answering her question is false, bordering on deceit.
I agree, nothing about that name is derogatory towards native Americans, rather it is mocking her claim.No, she is the racist for faking she was a minority and knowing she wasn't.
All the racism Is depressing.
Move over Fauxcahontas, Joe Biden is the first black woman to be VP to a black President.
My opinion? Vote Trump or your country is doomed.Dem supporters will think Kamala won the debate, GOP supporters will think Trump won the debate. Thats basically what will happen. It's pointless to ask who won, you'll just get biased answers thinking their candidate won. Anyone neutral enough to give objection opinions?
It's obvious that the ABC moderators are biased.I wonder why only Trump is being fact-checked?
At some point the legacy media morphed into what it is now so it's only a facade of what it was, but it gets its "air" from the source of that transformation so, it has to continue to do what it does, in order to survive. Personally, I've stopped giving them very much air to draw from. There's really not that much entertainment that the news segments now need to contribute as much to that draw as possible.It's obvious that the ABC moderators are biased.
White female singers for Harris.Taylor Swift endorses Kamala Harris for president after debate: ‘I’ve made my choice’
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ta...ris-president-after-debate-ive-made-my-choice
No surprise there.![]()