That or rebellious.Would 'defiant' be a good characterization of that?
That or rebellious.Would 'defiant' be a good characterization of that?
Or self-reliant. Self-willed.That or rebellious.
Don't know, the parable does not address your issue, implying your point is a red herring or simply a nothing burger. Nor does it matter, God can give grace regardless of its acceptance. God is sovereign, after all.Here is an example of grace given and received. Do you think the servant acted like this? Did he boast of being free from debt and willingly forgive the debt of others?
This verse has nothing to do with the parable. Again, grasping at straws.2 Corinthians 12:9
And He said to me, “My grace is sufficient for you, for My strength is made perfect in weakness.” Therefore most gladly I will rather boast in my infirmities, that the power of Christ may rest upon me.
God has many times taken back what he has freely given.God never takes back what He gives freely, it is either accepted or rejected.
Who has said such a thing???I am amazed at the people who think they can save themselves..
Who has said such a thing???
I would be amazed if you could quote people saying such a thing.
Who is one person who thinks grace can be revoked if it is not earned.Really? So why did the other servants report the unforgiving servants actions to the
The parable is clear, grace can be revoked.
???Who is one person who thinks grace can be revoked if it is not earned.
Should have known a legalist such as yourself would come to try to deny your trying to save yourself.
And I showed you the post.???
I will ask the question again.
Who can you quote that has said such a thing?
Your psychoanalysis conjecture of other people motives have no bearing here.
Neither does the legalist boogeyman in your head count.
In other words, if you don't have a quote just don't respond.
Does Jesus ever say, I am God? And yet the Bible teaches that He is. Similarly there are those here who claim that God does not need to move first or do any work in a person ... that the natural man is quite capable in and of himself, of choosing to believe that which he is hostile to in his mind, while being a lover of darkness, a slave to sin, and captive to the will of the devil. Some even say if God reveals Himself one way to one person it is unfair if He does not do the same for all. So everyone needs to have a Road to Damascscus and/or burning bush experience, and part the Red Sea. Keep your eyes open. Adding to this we have also been told that if God does move unilaterally He is kidnapping people against their will and is a tyrant.Who has said such a thing???
I would be amazed if you could quote people saying such a thing.
He was forsaken, for our sin. This was Him taking the punishment for our sin and you scoff at it? How about when He said Himself "My God, My God, why have you forsaken me?", why has God done what? "FORSAKEN Him". If the Father didn't forsake Him for your sin, then you still have it coming. This is the part of the sacrifice SO many well meaning Christians fall off at. They're good with God laying His life down for our sin, but get real sketchy when God the just is invoked. This is half the amazing point. Not only was God willing to lay down His life for us, but God was willing to put our punishment on the only innocent man that ever walked the earth, His own Son with who He was well pleased. God is perfectly just so cannot let one sin go unpunished, this is the unbelievable thing about salvation, Do not rob God of any of His glory, and applying our punishment to Jesus, the full wrath of the almighty God, so that His righteousness could be applied to us without His perfect justness being compromised at all, is a huge part of it. I'm sorry if this makes you feel upset, but if you are born again then it is because God was willing to do this, and to deny ANY part of it robs Him of due glory. If you think this makes Jesus look "poor pitiful", then I think you may not be as close to Him or the truth as you feel you are. The truth is an affront to those who are perishing.
You did no such thing. Just be honest. You have not presented a quote of anyone claiming what you have stated.And I showed you the post.
It is not I who said grace can be revoked but God.You said grace can be revoked. How is grace revoked unless it must be earned.
God is under no constraints to keep someone in His grace regardless of your sensibilities.How is grace revoked unless it must be earned.
This community. Who else? I suppose anybody reading along. That would include guests.Who is "we"?
Yea I dont disagree I do t think it matters looking at the Greek the scriptures already say first to believe in Jesus the son sent to save us , and if we do that we’re going to remain close to him and become disciplesActually, I believe the Greek more accurately says, John 6:29 "This is the work that God requires (ergon tou theou, the work of God) so that (hina) you might start to believe on Him Whom He has sent. The work of God is done so that they might believe. "This is the work of God" refers back in the passage to v. 7
" Labour not for the food which perishes, but for that food which endures into everlasting life, which the Son of man shall give to you: for him has God the Father sealed." The work of God is our labouring/striving to get into a position to hear the word of God, because faith comes by hearing the word of God, and salvation is through faith.
I suspect the "we" is more akin to the chosen or elect and not this community. Only those who both support "election" and consider themselves part of the elect would be offended by such words.This community. Who else? I suppose anybody reading along. That would include guests.
And since this was in answer to your question, you should have been able to deduce that yourself.
Offended by Christians lying about God? Hmmm. Well, if you agree that God is a scheming tyrant, an unjust judge, a kidnapper with wholly nefarious attributes, and that those who repent are the victim of a hoax, I can see why you would find nothing remarkable or of note in someone calling Him that type of monster. But it sounds more like atheist talking points than anything a Christian should say or agree with.I suspect the "we" is more akin to the chosen or elect and not this community. Only those who both
support "election" and consider themselves part of the elect would be offended by such words.
Well i did.. But since I quoted you. I can see why you deny it.. Thats fine.. you can deny it all you want. it will not make it true..You did no such thing. Just be honest. You have not presented a quote of anyone claiming what you have stated.
well when people die and they have rejected the grace of God,. their names are blotted out.It is not I who said grace can be revoked but God.
The parable of the unforgiving servant.
Your name being blotted out of the Book of Life.
The Galatians being removed from the grace of God.
God is under no constraints to keep someone in His grace regardless of your sensibilities.
God is sovereign, live with it.
Of What relevance is your point to the discussion? Why is that an important point?Certainly the power to overcome sin rests in our connection to Christ in us, but that wasn't my point. People do things all the time that bring themselves harm even knowing it will bring them harm.
It was in response to a post concerning the reason Adam sinned. Eve was deceived. Adam was not. He sinned knowing his action was sinful.Of What relevance is your point to the discussion? Why is that an important point?
You are confusing surmising with actual quoting. I can see why you are perplexed...that's understandable...you can stay confused but it will not make it true.Well i did.. But since I quoted you. I can see why you deny it.. Thats fine.. you can deny it all you want. it will not make it true..
You are simply rejecting the sovereignty of God. You have put your personal sensibilities about how God is supposed to act above the actual nature of God. In other words you have made a God of your own understanding in place of the God of the Bible.well when people die and they have rejected the grace of God,. their names are blotted out.
Everyones name is in the book of life. because Jesus died for them, hence grace is extended to everyone.
But if people want to reject grace. and turn to law (like you are in effect doing) then you have fallen from grace and in unbelief, your name will be blotted out.
You do not unearn grace because of something you do., or things you do not do.
You reject grace by rejecting the truth in unbelief
Jesus made it cleare
he who believes is NOT CONDEMNED.
he who does not believe is CONDEMNE$D ALREADY!!
in neither of those posts have you answered any of my questions.
you have slanderously called me evil,
you have slanderously said Satan speaks the truth,
and you have slanderously said God is evil,
but you have not answered my questions.
i'll repeat:
if Adam has zero concept of goodness how can he by comparing subjective outcomes about which he has no concept of how to evaluate, learn anything about those things he has zero concept of?
how can Adam be judged for doing evil if Adam is completely blind even to the very idea of right or wrong, and God says those who are blind have no sin?
if you and Satan are correct, that man can only be like God by doing evil, why does God only say of Adam, not Woman, that he has become "like us" - and why does He never say this until Adam has changed his dead wife's name to "Life" and God has clothed them?