Peter cut off the ear of Malchus. Although Jesus rebuked him, he did not question why he had a sword.. 
Peter cut off the ear of Malchus. Although Jesus rebuked him, he did not question why he had a sword..![]()
Exodus 22:4
Easy-to-Read Version
“If a thief is killed while trying to break into a house at night, then no one will be guilty for killing him. But if this happens during the day, the one who killed him will be guilty of murder.
Difference, one can see if he was armed.
Some guns are more neutral than others. No civilian needs an assault rifle.A gun of itself is neutral. End of story.
Some guns are more neutral than others. No civilian needs an assault rifle.
And He healed the poor soul that had his ear cut off. And the disciples had two swords between them. I do not recall anywhere in the book of Acts or the epistles where any believer used a sword to defend himself. I don't know why Jesus instructed the disciples to get swords.Jesus made it a big priority for His disciples to have a sword just like the Roman soldiers carried.
Jesus tod Peter to put away your sword not Throw it away LOLPeter cut off the ear of Malchus. Although Jesus rebuked him, he did not question why he had a sword..![]()
Yes, I do need a gun. Nobody is forcing you to have one. The 2nd Amendment is about the freedom to have one of you want one. Take that.All right folks, let’s buckle up.
NO YOU DON’T NEED A GUN !
IVE NEVER HAD A GUN. TAKE THAT SECOND AMENDMENT !
Rifles don't assault. People do.Some guns are more neutral than others. No civilian needs an assault rifle.
Yes, I do need a gun. Nobody is forcing you to have one. The 2nd Amendment is about the freedom to have one of you want one. Take that.
I do not propose outlawing guns. It's impracticable for a start. Cars don't kill people either, but there are controls on who can drive and in what condition they are in. Is it acceptable in America for someone to drive a semi if they have no licence to do so? Who needs an 18 wheeler to drive the kids to school? That's my point. No one outside of the military or security forces "need" an assault rifle.Rifles don't assault. People do.
I do not propose outlawing guns. It's impracticable for a start. Cars don't kill people either, but there are controls on who can drive and in what condition they are in. Is it acceptable in America for someone to drive a semi if they have no licence to do so? Who needs an 18 wheeler to drive the kids to school? That's my point. No one outside of the military or security forces "need" an assault rifle.
There's no correlation at all. Drinking is a privilege. Bearing arms is a right. Again, there are no "assault" rifles. They are neutral. Assault is an action by a person.I do not propose outlawing guns. It's impracticable for a start. Cars don't kill people either, but there are controls on who can drive and in what condition they are in. Is it acceptable in America for someone to drive a semi if they have no licence to do so? Who needs an 18 wheeler to drive the kids to school? That's my point. No one outside of the military or security forces "need" an assault rifle.
Says you. Vehicles don't crash by themselves either. No one gives the keys of a semi to a novice driver.There's no correlation at all. Drinking is a privilege. Bearing arms is a right. Again, there are no "assault" rifles. They are neutral. Assault is an action by a person.
I do not propose outlawing guns. It's impracticable for a start. Cars don't kill people either, but there are controls on who can drive and in what condition they are in. Is it acceptable in America for someone to drive a semi if they have no licence to do so? Who needs an 18 wheeler to drive the kids to school? That's my point. No one outside of the military or security forces "need" an assault rifle.
And He healed the poor soul that had his ear cut off. And the disciples had two swords between them. I do not recall anywhere in the book of Acts or the epistles where any believer used a sword to defend himself. I don't know why Jesus instructed the disciples to get swords.
The equivalent to an AR15 in those days would not be a sword. It would be a ranged weapon, such as a Ballista or at least a bow and arrow.