Did Jesus Die on The Cross for The Just/Elect/Saved Whose Names Are Written in The Book of Life OR
- Thread starter MerSee
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
I agree. And more. And God held a nation responsible for knowing their Scriptures and held their shepherds responsible for properly shepherding.
Maybe disagree. Some seem to think He hasn't sufficient power to make Himself clear to all men.
Yes, so I am aware... and what we believe gets misrepresented quite often as well.
Regardless of how patiently it is explained, or how clearly the Scriptures make plain.
No, you still don't get it. All men are knuckleheads. There's no difference between anyone. God took all his elect out of the same lump of knuckleheads and made them into a second lump so he could transform them into saints (Rom 9). If you had any spiritual insight whatsoever, you would have picked up on this great spiritual truth taught in the Exodus narrative. God came down to rescue a bunch of helpless, idolatrous knucklehead children of Abraham (the elect) while "passing over" all the helpless Egyptian knucklehead idolaters who were not Abraham's seed (non-elect).
See how easy that was?
P.S. And John 16, for your info, teaches that Jesus promised to send the Holy Spirit to his elect ("you" in v. 7 isn't the world in the distributive sense). Also, Jesus promised his sheep that the Spirit would guide "you" into all truth -- the disciples to whom he was speaking and by extension the rest of the sheep he prayed for in the next chapter.
Yes, in part. He also held them ultimately responsible for rejecting Messiah and the New Covenant He had promised to resolve the breaking of the Old.
Good enough. Last word is yours if you choose. I'll bask in a few moments of agreement with you and walk away for awhile.
Jesus is quoted to say "believe" 94 times in the Gospel of John.
I trust Him.
He is a savior, He does not offer false hope.
And he is not a potential savior...or possible savior. He actually is the Savior of all his chosen, covenant people -- and was their Savior before the foundation of the world.
I agree completely. with that. But we were discussing what someone needs to be saved, not what one needs to do to grow in grace and in the knowledge of the Lord Jesus Christ. By your theory, it sounds like all those who lived before the birth, death and resurrection of Christ needed to both have Jesus appear to them and have Jesus share with them what He was going to do to save the world. Otherwise how do you see them having a personal relationship with Christ. What do you believe pre-Jesus of Nazareth humans needed to experience in order to be saved?
The bare minimum as I understand it was to believe in the light they had been given. That is, whatever God had revealed to them they needed to embrace and acknowledge, and keep in their knowledge the God so revealed. that is what Romans 2 says.
Romans 1
0 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
21 Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.
22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,
23 And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.
24 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves:
25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.
26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:
27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.
28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient;
29 Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers,
30 Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents,
31 Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful:
32 Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.
According to Romans 1, the natural man can know God enough to understand His invisible deity and power and to hold Him in their thoughts, and to hear Him speak through their conscience and reason to know evil as evil and as bringing condemnation. So, your claim that the natural man cannot know anything of God unless he is regenerated first is contradicted by scripture.
"Who are you , O man, to contradict God?
The text you are alluding to rests within the context of Paul discussing not being able to teach carnal believers the deeper things of God which deal with the things God has supplied to believers in the Christ they have received through faith in the gospel, It is not about teachng the elementary doctrines of repentance, faith, baptism, the laying on of hands, and resurrection.
Heb. 6:6 Therefore let us leave the elementary doctrine of Christ and go on to maturity, not laying again a foundation of repentance from dead works and of faith toward God, 2 and of instruction about washings,[a] the laying on of hands, the resurrection of the dead, and eternal judgment.
1 Timothy 4:10
That is why we labor and strive, because we have put our hope in the
living God, who is the Savior of all men, especially of those who believe."
1 John 2:2
He is the atoning sacrifice for our sins, and not only for ours but also for the sins of the whole world.
Now, Rufus?
This is the challenge I place before you.
Please show us a way to make us forget what those two verses are saying.
Let's look at Romans 7, remembering that the definition of "dead" , which you shoe-horn into selective verses to make them "teach" your doctrine, is "unable to hear, see, understand or do anything."
Rom. 7
4 Wherefore, my brethren, ye also are become dead to the law by the body of Christ; that ye should be married to another, even to him who is raised from the dead, that we should bring forth fruit unto God.
According to your definition, Christians have become dead to the law: unable to hear, see, understand or do the law..
5 For when we were in the flesh, the motions of sins, which were by the law, did work in our members to bring forth fruit unto death.
According to your definition, when Christians were previously living in the flesh, before regeneration, the law produced pathEma,, influencesvia sin to make them break the law.
6 But now we are delivered from the law, that being dead wherein we were held; that we should serve in newness of spirit, and not in the oldness of the letter.
According to your definition, now the regenerate Christian cannot be influenced by the law because the law is now dead, so the law cannot see, hera, understand or do anything in the Christian's life.
7 What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet.
The knowledge of sin came by hearing the law, nit by being conceived. Before we hear any moral law, there can be no awareness of sin.
,.
8 But sin, taking occasion by the commandment, wrought in me all manner of concupiscence. For without the law sin was dead.
According to your definition, without the law, sin had no abiltiy to see, hear, understand or do anything in my life.
9 For I was alive without the law once: but when the commandment came, sin revived, and I died.
Since sin had no power over me before the law came, I was not yet slain by the law, so I was spiritually alive without the law before the law enabled sin to kill me. It was only when the commandment cam that sin subsequently rose from its powerless death. According to your definition of dead, sin, being dead, could not raise itself from death. Only God can have raised the dead sin to life. So your definition of dead/death makes God the one who empowered sin to use the law to kill me. According to you God gave sin life and gave sin a weapon to kill me with.
10 And the commandment, which was ordained to life, I found to be unto death.
However, Paul says the law was decreed for life, nit for death. So, your definition creates a contradiction in God's word.
11 For sin, taking occasion by the commandment, deceived me, and by it slew me.
Had not God given life to dead sin, the law would not have become a weapon that dead sin could use. But according to your definition, of death, God awakened sin in order that I would become dead: unable to see, hear, understand or do anything spiritual that pertains to God.
12 Wherefore the law is holy, and the commandment holy, just, and good..
Paul says that the law is holy, just and good. But your definition But you have made it into a weapon God devised to deliberately render me deaf, blind and completely unable to do His will.
13 Was then that which is good made death unto me? God forbid. But sin, that it might appear sin, working death in me by that which is good; that sin by the commandment might become exceeding sinful.
Paul refutes the logical entailments otf your definituon of dead. Sin was not dead by your definition, but dead by the general definition of separated from life.. Sin was not attached to my life before I sinned against they law. It was then that sin began to live parasitically, by commandeering parts of my my living body and mind. I let sin in. God did not put sin in me. God allowed it so that I might learn how despicable sin is out there and now also in here.
14 For we know that the law is spiritual: but I am carnal, sold under sin.
The law set good goals for and limits onto society. But now that I have allowed sin to get into me, I find I am not wise or self-disciplined enough persistently refuse to obey sin's influence,.I am like a slave. I am intimidated by fears to do things that are against my will. And whatsoever I am obeying, to that I am being a slave.
15 For that which I do I allow not: for what I would, that do I not; but what I hate, that do I.
16 If then I do that which I would not, I consent unto the law that it is good.
17 Now then it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me.
18 For I know that in me (that is, in my flesh,) dwelleth no good thing: for to will is present with me; but how to perform that which is good I find not.
19 For the good that I would I do not: but the evil which I would not, that I do.
20 Now if I do that I would not, it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me.
21 I find then a law, that, when I would do good, evil is present with me.
22 For I delight in the law of God after the inward man:
23 But I see another law in my members, warring against the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin which is in my members.
The sin parasite acts like a computer virus, and hinders me from fulfilling my desires to consistently keep the moral laws I have been given.
24 O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me from the body of this death?
Accoprding to your definition of dead, the unregenerate man given a moral law discovers that He can neither see, hear, understand or do anything spiritual pertaining to God.
But wait a minute. If he cannot see, hear, or understand anything pertaining to God, how does he know that he cannot see, herar, undestand or do anything spiritual pertaining to God? He cannot possible discover that spiritual truth. until God forst regenerates Him. But he does not ask, "Who has regenerated me and delivered me from this body of complete inability to see, hear, understand and do anything spiritual pertaining to God?"
he asks "Who will deliver me from the body of this complete inability to see, hear, understand and do anything spiritual pertaining to God?""
So, he is still unregenerate and dead when He cries out for deliverance from this insidious virus pervertingb His life.
25 I thank God through Jesus Christ our Lord. So then with the mind I myself serve the law of God; but with the flesh the law of sin.
Then he discovers the gospel, and how Jesus frees us from our separation
According to your definition, this must be about physical death, where the body cannot see, hear, understand or do anything at all. Dead mans dead. Right?
. But really it is deliverance from a physical body separated from God's life because the sin virus has infiltrated and sabotaged the body's ability to remain connected to God through submission to the spirit and soul of the unregenerate.man who has had his conscience activated by hearing and understanding some moral law..
Your special pleading reading of "spiritual death" and "spiritually dead" into the biblical revelation , if applied consistently,, creates this spaghetti of nonsensical doctrine.
Agreed. And some of those mentions of "believe" are commands to believe.