I personally have no way of knowing who is and is not in the Book of Life.yes but the questions i have asked you.
do you have any answer?
I personally have no way of knowing who is and is not in the Book of Life.yes but the questions i have asked you.
do you have any answer?
while I agree with you, we are still talking hypothetical situations. In real life, every day, "coming to Jesus" events, ALL the parts of the process need to be followed.Yep Cornelius wasn’t a good example because he was baptized. The point is that while water baptism is important, if a person has a deathbed conversion, gets saved but dies on the way to the baptistery, or in some way isn’t able to get water baptized before death, they will still go to Heaven.
while I agree with you, we are still talking hypothetical situations. In real life, every day, "coming to Jesus" events, ALL the parts of the process need to be followed.
To minimize baptism to the point of "if you want to do it, that's good, but if you don't want to do it, that's ok, too" is missing the boat entirely.
Otherwise, you might as well be in the "faith only" crowd.... which I suspect you are. Scripture does not teach that, unless you cherry-pick individual scriptures to fit your pre-conceived idea.
There are too many scriptures that point to the necessity of baptism, along with the Biblical records of the apostles teaching it, along with hundreds of years of following that pattern to say that it is not necessary.....
I agree with this, as well. Baptism by itself does not save you.... just as faith by itself doesn't save you... or believing by itself doesn't save you.... it takes all of those things.... and trying to decide the exact point of salvation is just arguing jots and tittles... follow the Biblical examples... you have to do it all.We agree on the point, water baptism doesn't save a person.
Yes... you are very careful to not say that, specifically. What you DO is minimize the importance by saying "if you for whatever reason are not baptized, that's ok... believing is enough" This is false teaching by implication... and if you are honest, you KNOW that new believers will infer that from your lack of emphasis....Where did anyone say baptism wasn't important?!
OK, what does prove a person is saved?
is it something people can observe or is it something only God can?
I agree with this, as well. Baptism by itself does not save you.... just as faith by itself doesn't save you... or believing by itself doesn't save you.... it takes all of those things.... and trying to decide the exact point of salvation is just arguing jots and tittles... follow the Biblical examples... you have to do it all.
Yes... you are very careful to not say that, specifically. What you DO is minimize the importance by saying "if you for whatever reason are not baptized, that's ok... believing is enough" This is false teaching by implication... and if you are honest, you KNOW that new believers will infer that from your lack of emphasis....
In that household, and for that time, and to convince the Jewish believers that Gentiles were being added to the Church, it was God who felt it NECESSARY to give the Jewish believers direct evidence. That is exactly what the record shows, so read it very carefully: And they of the circumcision [Jewish believers] which believed were astonished, as many as came with Peter, because that on the Gentiles also was poured out the gift of the Holy Ghost. For they heard them speak with tongues, and magnify God. Then answered Peter, Can any man forbid water, that these should not be baptized, which have received the Holy Ghost as well as we? (Acts 10:45-47)The spirit of tongues does not "prove" salvation.
I personally have no way of knowing who is and is not in the Book of Life.
Not the church I attend.AFTER they received the gift of the Holy Spirit. That was solid proof of their salvation. And the reason Peter "commanded" them to be baptized is because the Lord commanded all the apostles and their companions -- indeed the whole Church -- to baptize IMMEDIATELY after a person gets saved. And that is precisely what you see in the NT. Paul and Silas baptized the household of the Philippian jailer shortly after midnight. But rarely does any church today follow this NT pattern. Some churches even falsely teach that baptism if for church membership their their church.
come on, Post..... you're better than that.... why all the completely unnecessary silly questions?i should add, too, that it was at this time infant baptism began to be practiced. child mortality was high, and parents, wanting their children to enter the kingdom, would baptize them if they were sick and dying, even if they were not old enough to speak. what was being taught was that, independent of faith, water baptism removed sin - whether a person understood the gospel or not.
@Lamar do you believe this?
so if a person hears false teaching and responds to lies by being baptized, are they saved?
Saul of Tarsus persecuted Christians UNTIL…he met Jesus on the road to Damascus. Acts 9 He was blinded by a very bright light but Jesus talked to him and told him,” I am Jesus…” Saul BELIVED and asked Jesus, “What do you want me to do?” Let’s just stop right here and ask yourself what do preachers today say Saul should do right here?
Some would say, “ There is NOTHING you need to do. You ‘believe’ so you are saved.”
Some would say, “ Just repeat the ‘sinner’s prayer’ and you will be saved.”
Some would say, “ Just accept Jesus in your heart and you will be saved.”
Some would say he was saved because he had a “religious experience.”
So what did JESUS say? He told Saul to go into the city and there he would be told WHAT HE MUST DO! Obviously, there was MORE he needed to do to be saved than just believe. If not, then why did Jesus say that?
Saul spent 3 days in Damascus fasting and praying. Evidence of REPENTANCE but no evidence that he “prayed through” to salvation. Finally, Ananias came to him and told him to “Arise, and be BAPTIZED and wash away your sins.” Saul still had his SINS three days after he BELIEVED, and REPENTED. This was what “he was told he must do.”
Nope, speaking in tongues does not prove you are saved.
And this is what you are implying.
I personally have no way of knowing who is and is not in the Book of Life.
nor i
so i think the best approach is caution, and faith in the faithfulness of God to those who believe Him
come on, Post..... you're better than that.... why all the completely unnecessary silly questions?
i honestly wonder if this belief is still around
“And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature. He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved;
but he that believeth not shall be damned.”
Mark 16:15-16 KJV