A contradiction of Mark 16:16?
No..
(Mar 16:16) KJV: He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned.
Notice the later part of this verse. Being damned is conditioned on not believing. Not on 'not getting water baptised'
Often we can put a verse into it's opposite and think it is true. For eg.. 'He that believeth and is not baptised shall not be saved.'
The problem is.. this is false logic. Not everything put in opposite of a positive statement is true. Just compare Mark 16:16 with John 5:24, 6:40, 10:28, Romans 10:9-10. Where is the weight of scripture? What is it saying? Do you establish a doctrine of water baptism for salvation based on a few verses.. or the full weight of scripture?
Same goes for Acts 2:38
Act 2:38 KJV: Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.
This is ONE verse of a few that have baptism being put with remission (forgiveness) of sin.
Key question: Who is Peter talking to?
Act 2:36 Therefore let all the house of Israel know assuredly, that God hath made that same Jesus, whom ye have crucified, both Lord and Christ.
Act 2:37 Now when they heard this, they were pricked in their heart, and said unto Peter and to the rest of the apostles, Men and brethren, what shall we do?
What were they called to do first? Get water baptised?
No-- repent.. having a change of mind, heart from God.
The other part of this..is being baptised in the name of Jesus 'for' the remission of sin.
In English grammar.. you can be given something 'for' an illness.
So.. you get water baptism 'for' the fact of already having remission of sin. Now.. so you will say I am just interpreting this to match my own wishes.. but what does the full weight of scripture say about eternal salvation? How many verses.. again.. have not water baptism in them.. but are about receiving eternal life?
No..
(Mar 16:16) KJV: He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned.
Notice the later part of this verse. Being damned is conditioned on not believing. Not on 'not getting water baptised'
Often we can put a verse into it's opposite and think it is true. For eg.. 'He that believeth and is not baptised shall not be saved.'
The problem is.. this is false logic. Not everything put in opposite of a positive statement is true. Just compare Mark 16:16 with John 5:24, 6:40, 10:28, Romans 10:9-10. Where is the weight of scripture? What is it saying? Do you establish a doctrine of water baptism for salvation based on a few verses.. or the full weight of scripture?
Same goes for Acts 2:38
Act 2:38 KJV: Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.
This is ONE verse of a few that have baptism being put with remission (forgiveness) of sin.
Key question: Who is Peter talking to?
Act 2:36 Therefore let all the house of Israel know assuredly, that God hath made that same Jesus, whom ye have crucified, both Lord and Christ.
Act 2:37 Now when they heard this, they were pricked in their heart, and said unto Peter and to the rest of the apostles, Men and brethren, what shall we do?
What were they called to do first? Get water baptised?
No-- repent.. having a change of mind, heart from God.
The other part of this..is being baptised in the name of Jesus 'for' the remission of sin.
In English grammar.. you can be given something 'for' an illness.
So.. you get water baptism 'for' the fact of already having remission of sin. Now.. so you will say I am just interpreting this to match my own wishes.. but what does the full weight of scripture say about eternal salvation? How many verses.. again.. have not water baptism in them.. but are about receiving eternal life?
- 2
- 1
- Show all