Here’s ANOTHER person of color speaking about supporting Trump. You should too. Not satanic democrats.
https://x.com/CitizenFreePres/status/1793861660094177342
https://x.com/CitizenFreePres/status/1793861660094177342
Could Trump do anything to make you stop supporting him?
- Thread starter ResidentAlien
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Quit being such a sourpuss.
Just shoot the works, and vote Trump.
Here is why:
Hint....Biden is the goat that we know. Makes the choice that much easier!
Understanding the Monty Hall Problem
The Monty Hall problem is a counter-intuitive statistics puzzle:
Surprisingly, the odds aren’t 50-50. If you switch doors you’ll win 2/3 of the time!
Just shoot the works, and vote Trump.
Here is why:
Hint....Biden is the goat that we know. Makes the choice that much easier!
Understanding the Monty Hall Problem
The Monty Hall problem is a counter-intuitive statistics puzzle:
- There are 3 doors, behind which are two goats and a car.
- You pick a door (call it door A). You’re hoping for the car of course.
- Monty Hall, the game show host, examines the other doors (B & C) and opens one with a goat. (If both doors have goats, he picks randomly.)
Surprisingly, the odds aren’t 50-50. If you switch doors you’ll win 2/3 of the time!
Ya know there’s a serious problem when a supposed Christian lies about another Christian.
I know of another being that deceives people. Trying to stay just close enough to the truth to make their lie seem true.
Since I’m the one that called the Democrats AGENDA satanic, you are definitely talking about me, while deceptively not using my name.
But as just stated, I called NO ONE satanic. I called their agenda satanic.
But we both know you knew that.
I know of another being that deceives people. Trying to stay just close enough to the truth to make their lie seem true.
Since I’m the one that called the Democrats AGENDA satanic, you are definitely talking about me, while deceptively not using my name.
But as just stated, I called NO ONE satanic. I called their agenda satanic.
But we both know you knew that.
-
2
- Show all
"Flashback to Nov 3, 2020!
138,000 votes were dumped at 4:30 am in Wisconsin and all 138,000 votes went to Joe Biden. This is statistically impossible."
https://x.com/DrEtiquette/status/1793628426504696286
138,000 votes were dumped at 4:30 am in Wisconsin and all 138,000 votes went to Joe Biden. This is statistically impossible."
https://x.com/DrEtiquette/status/1793628426504696286
-
1
-
1
- Show all
Correction: it is statistically impossible to not be fraud.
Obviously it was not impossible. Likewise the number 100% is also statistically possible. What is impossible is in an election that was very close to 50/50 for a large number of votes to be 100% for one candidate when the entire election was closer to 50/50.
Let me give you a true story. I was working in a school of 2,000 kids. We had about five Earth Science teachers and about 500 exams. There are 85 questions on each exam. However, after grading the first 3 questions on all 85 exams I made a prediction on how many would fail, how many would pass and how many would score higher than a certain grade. Since my numbers were 33%, 66%, etc. they were somewhat generic. But in the end they were accurate though not precise.
What is more telling to me is that it is impossible that anyone who works with numbers and statistics (which includes all key campaign staff and pollsters) doesn't know that it was fraud. So think of the implication for the MSM bringing on talking heads "debunking" claims of election fraud. If they are truly experts then it is impossible that they are not also liars. Obviously if they are not truly experts then the MSM lied saying they were.
This reminds me of an episode of numbers. The mathematician thinks someone is a fraud so they test him, can he predict the face color of the playing cards in the deck. Guy comes out and said you were right he couldn't do it, he got them wrong. The math guy asks "how many did he get wrong". The guy says all of them. He realizes getting 100% wrong is just as statistically impossible as getting 100% right.
Obviously it was not impossible. Likewise the number 100% is also statistically possible. What is impossible is in an election that was very close to 50/50 for a large number of votes to be 100% for one candidate when the entire election was closer to 50/50.
Let me give you a true story. I was working in a school of 2,000 kids. We had about five Earth Science teachers and about 500 exams. There are 85 questions on each exam. However, after grading the first 3 questions on all 85 exams I made a prediction on how many would fail, how many would pass and how many would score higher than a certain grade. Since my numbers were 33%, 66%, etc. they were somewhat generic. But in the end they were accurate though not precise.
What is more telling to me is that it is impossible that anyone who works with numbers and statistics (which includes all key campaign staff and pollsters) doesn't know that it was fraud. So think of the implication for the MSM bringing on talking heads "debunking" claims of election fraud. If they are truly experts then it is impossible that they are not also liars. Obviously if they are not truly experts then the MSM lied saying they were.
This reminds me of an episode of numbers. The mathematician thinks someone is a fraud so they test him, can he predict the face color of the playing cards in the deck. Guy comes out and said you were right he couldn't do it, he got them wrong. The math guy asks "how many did he get wrong". The guy says all of them. He realizes getting 100% wrong is just as statistically impossible as getting 100% right.
-
1
- Show all
Oh there is no doubt that everybody knows it's a fraud. Every government spook agency in the world knows too. And absolutely no action was taking to prosecute offending parties. Rather it was the whistleblowers who were prosecuted.
Given this unsavory reality how long does America have left before the inevitable Thelma and Louise moment?
Given this unsavory reality how long does America have left before the inevitable Thelma and Louise moment?
-
1
- Show all
As opposed to Republicans who usually damage the economy?
https://www.commondreams.org/news/us-economy-better-democrats
https://www.commondreams.org/news/us-economy-better-democrats
Agreed. I started a thread "Is Joe Biden a "wannabe dictator" as Fox news reported?" but no one posts there. It seems no one is willing to say he isn't. Why don't you go to that thread and post your answer to this question. That will stop everyone on this forum calling you a chicken and a Nazi. 
-
1
- Show all
shining the spotlight on the snowflake tactic.
Hold it, you say you don't want to derail this thread by answering these questions. I provide you with a very simple solution where you don't have to be called a chicken because you are able to answer their questions and refute their arguments without derailing this thread, which was your objection, and now you claim that is a snowflake tactic?
I don't think so, I think it is a shining the spotlight on the snowflake tactic. stop being a coward and answer the question either on this thread or on that thread.
Hold it, you say you don't want to derail this thread by answering these questions. I provide you with a very simple solution where you don't have to be called a chicken because you are able to answer their questions and refute their arguments without derailing this thread, which was your objection, and now you claim that is a snowflake tactic?
I don't think so, I think it is a shining the spotlight on the snowflake tactic. stop being a coward and answer the question either on this thread or on that thread.