I have no concern for your disagreement with egEverlasting-Grace is the one who claimed to not be able to believe correct/sound doctrine.
I was pointing out God was giving a warning
I have no concern for your disagreement with egEverlasting-Grace is the one who claimed to not be able to believe correct/sound doctrine.
I can't sow what you've already reapedAlof of people think God showed them something.
I can't claim that they all have heard from God.
So like I said, you can try to show me, and I will determine if I believe you or not.
so you can't show me what you claim God told you.I can't sow what you've already reaped
can't sow if your not recievingso you can't show me what you claim God told you.
Thats what I thought
No
Only those who believe are elect.
Why do you think your so special? Why would God save you and not someone else?
I can recieve.. Does not mean I will believe.can't sow if your not recieving
demandingI can recieve.. Does not mean I will believe.
either show it to me, or move on..
I disagree with everything you say, as I have an opposite view to yourself.
You do the usual thing those who have no point to make, or anything of value to add. You just attack the man instead of presenting a valid argument.
I notice you have nothing against John Calvin's interpretation of the gospel message, but you just hate the man. That makes me very suspicious of you and shows that you afraid of John Calvin and the only logical reason for your fear is that he exposes the false doctrine you hold to.
You're very unsure of your faith if a dead man threatens you. This makes me think John is right and you're wrong, because you haven't found any fault with his interpretation so you just hate it because it exposes yours.
You claim to be fully clothed with the righteousness of Christ, but I see the opposite in you
Wow man, talk about a confused, contradictory and incoherent view. You contradict yourself every minute.
First you accuse Calvin's God of being an evil monster, then you turn around justify that monstrous false god. You can't have it both ways, God is either good or He's evil.
Firstly Calvinists don't believe in that evil God who creates people for the purpose of sadistic torture. That god only exists in your imagination and not in the bible.
God doesn't punish innocent people, so your accusation is unbiblical and us Calvinists never claimed any such ridiculous thing./QUOTE]
Yes, you do! You just don't want to admit that you do.
John Calvin
"We say, then, that Scripture clearly proves this much, that God by his eternal and immutable counsel determined once for all those whom it was his pleasure one day to admit to salvation, and those whom, on the other hand, it was his pleasure to doom to destruction.
We maintain that this counsel, as regards the elect, is founded on his free mercy, without any respect to human worth, while those whom he dooms to destruction are excluded from access to life by a just and blameless, but at the same time incomprehensible judgment.
In regard to the elect, we regard calling as the evidence of election, and justification as another symbol of its manifestation, until it is fully accomplished by the attainment of glory. But as the Lord seals his elect by calling and justification, so by excluding the reprobate either from the knowledge of his name or the sanctification of his Spirit, he by these marks in a manner discloses the judgment which awaits them.
First you claim that God saved all people, because you deny that He failed in His mission to save all on the cross, then you turn around and say but He failed because He has to cast so many into hell because He failed to save all.
In fact I said God never fails. So don't put words in my mouth I did not say! That is what YOU believe. Not me.
It's obvious you don't know anything about Calvinism .
No, the problem is we DO know about Calvin. And he was nothing more than a man. So now we have his words, I expect you can defend them. Here they are again.
it was his pleasure to doom to destruction.
while those whom he dooms to destruction are excluded from access to life by a just and blameless, but at the same time incomprehensible judgment.
so by excluding the reprobate either from the knowledge of his name or the sanctification of his Spirit, he by these marks in a manner discloses the judgment which awaits them.
In light of ...
John 2:16, 1John 2:2, 2 Cor. 5:14-15,1 Peter 3:18,Romans 6:10,Hebrews 9:26-28, Hebrews 9:12,John 11:25,John 1:29,Matthew 20:28 ,Romans 5:8, Hebrews 2:9, Hebrews 2:9, 2 Peter 3:9, 1 Timothy 4:10, 2 Corinthians 5:14, Isaiah 53:6, Hebrews 7:27, Matthew 26:28,1 John 4:10, John 3:18, 1 John 4:14,John 8:12 ,1 Timothy 2:6, Revelation 3:20
Calvins dogma against the light of Scripture. Explain
Yes well i see telling people your going to ignore them worthlessInsulting people seems to be your main reason for being here.
Just gonna put you on ignore
tootles
Did I say that? No, I did not. I said Christ died for the Whole world as the word of God says He was given for in John 3:16 Jesus speaking. No, I did say it was based on their choice.so you say that Christ did not die to secure salvation for anyone but instead died to potentially save all people based upon their choice and not His. Is that correct?
It is not a hard thing to understand that God loves justice so much that He killed His only Son at the hands of evil men in order to secure salvation for His people and He justly kills about 180,000 people every day which is around two people every second because the soul that sins shall die and the wages of sin is death (Eze 18:4,20, Rom 6:23).
God loves those who love Him and they only do so because He first loved them (Pro 8:17, 1 Jn 4:19).
View attachment 262866
No God did not change the world. God hasn't done a single thing for the past 2000 years. Men of God changed the world
That doesn't negate the fact that God hated Esau, while he was still in his mothers womb. Regardless of of the passage of time. God said it and you either accept God Word or you reject Gods Word. You can't dance around the question and bring up things which don't change or challenge the fact.No he did not. where do you get this?
God spoke these words in malichi. Esau the person had been dead for centuries by this time
Where did I cause Jesus to contradict Himself?You caused Jesus to contradict himself.
so lets solve the apparant contradiction.
Again, you prove my point. You say there is a third option but you constantly fail to describe this mysterious non existent option. Every time you fail to provide evidence of it's existence, only con firm that I'm right.No alternatives?
Why not listen to what a person is saying other than listening with a calvinist or arminian perspective?
How about setting aside the arminian vs calvin debate and just speak about the word?
There are many alternatives.
Thats because they make it a calvin vs arminian debate.
Do you know how many calvinista or arminians are actually in this chatroom? I doubt there are very many, So why are we arguing about the two?
Or we can do like MANY have done, and chose NEITHER of the two choices..
I personally reject both forms of theology.. So I think it is a shame when someone calls me a calvinist because I believe in eternal security, or someone calls me an arminian because I reject calvinism.
I think you missed my point completely.
That doesn't negate the fact that God hated Esau, while he was still in his mothers womb. Regardless of of the passage of time. God said it and you either accept God Word or you reject Gods Word. You can't dance around the question and bring up things which don't change or challenge the fact.
I don't understand why so many people can't stand Gods Word as it is, so they desperately try to change it's meaning. Why can't we just accept it and move on.
Now you're denying Gods order. He appointed Shepherds to watch over us venerable and gullible and Sheep.Same could be said of you my friend.
So we should listen to men? Since when should we place our eternity in the hands of another person?
God told us to study to show ourselves approved, rightly dividing the word of truth
he also told us to test each spirit (truth)
The roman church does not want you to do this, because they would be exposed.. Sadly you have fallen into their trap