Did Jesus Die on The Cross for The Just/Elect/Saved Whose Names Are Written in The Book of Life OR
- Thread starter MerSee
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Those speaking calvinist talking points are usually calvinists
That's keepin the deal real no matter how you feel
That's exactly what the calvinist are claiming.
Then they claim they are the only ones that are saved and those that disagree with them are not saved.[/QUOTE]
I for one never said that. I'm certainly not omniscient.
That's keepin the deal real no matter how you feel
That's exactly what the calvinist are claiming.
Then they claim they are the only ones that are saved and those that disagree with them are not saved.[/QUOTE]
I for one never said that. I'm certainly not omniscient.
And again you've been corrected by those who know better than you do:
Since you are quoting the Reformed Principles verbatim, I made a decision to start quoting Scholars and Theologians who know and which you are not of their educational level.
Here, just so you know what the scholars say about "Might Be Saved"
used to express the possibility that something will happen although not very likely:
That is what you keep doing by placing this to the Elect, they might be saved although not likely.
You are saying the Elect are not saved!
Your biggest failure is to understand the prepositions of the koine Greek, which you are using the KJV and far from that form of Greek.
You are attempting to define word for word but that is not how JOHN wrote it. Whenever one uses the koine Greek, they will use a multitude of prepositions. And since you choose to lack the understanding concerning this, you will always be INCORRECT.
Since you are quoting the Reformed Principles verbatim, I made a decision to start quoting Scholars and Theologians who know and which you are not of their educational level.
Here, just so you know what the scholars say about "Might Be Saved"
used to express the possibility that something will happen although not very likely:
That is what you keep doing by placing this to the Elect, they might be saved although not likely.
You are saying the Elect are not saved!
Your biggest failure is to understand the prepositions of the koine Greek, which you are using the KJV and far from that form of Greek.
You are attempting to define word for word but that is not how JOHN wrote it. Whenever one uses the koine Greek, they will use a multitude of prepositions. And since you choose to lack the understanding concerning this, you will always be INCORRECT.
What Mr. Shiloh wants to do with his vaunted scholars is beyond rich and ironic and hypocritical! I haven't seen any Reformed person here refer to any extra-biblical works to support his belief in the Five Doctrines of Grace. He now wants to appeal to "scholars" because he can't support his argument from scripture, nor does he want to tell us that he favors the well-known corrupt, least reliable Alexandrian manuscripts when it's convenient for him to do so, e.g. with Jn 3:17.
I haven't seen any Reformed person here refer to any extra-biblical works to support his belief in the Five Doctrines of Grace. He now wants to appeal to "scholars" because he can't support his argument from scripture, nor does he want to tell us that he favors the well-known corrupt, least reliable Alexandrian manuscripts when it's convenient for him to do so, e.g. with Jn 3:17.
No, he's not! YOU are with your foolish interpretation that contradicts numerous scriptures! Your "scholars" care as little about contradictions as you do, apparently.
Well... now we know why God hasn't chosen very many of the wise of this world. At least most of the Reformed understand and appreciate the fact that God cannot lie, which means whatever we own for our theology, it must not contradict God's Word. And this makes me very comfortable in my "reformed" skin.
