It would help if you would learn to use the quote function. At the moment, you are raging against who knows what.
Did Jesus Die on The Cross for The Just/Elect/Saved Whose Names Are Written in The Book of Life OR
- Thread starter MerSee
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
You must have the other person on ignore. Then you don't see their posts when quoted, either.
Under the older platform, that was not the case, so at least in this way, the newer was an improvement.
Great example! And there's plenty more dealing with prophecy fulfillment from where that came. But according to Mr. Shiloh, where it is written "that it might be fulfilled" means only possibly fulfilled. God's prophecies could have failed.
Oy vey!
Since you are quoting the Reformed Principles verbatim, I made a decision to start quoting Scholars and Theologians who know and which you are not of their educational level.
Here, just so you know what the scholars say about "Might Be Saved"
used to express the possibility that something will happen although not very likely:
That is what you keep doing by placing this to the Elect, they might be saved although not likely.
You are saying the Elect are not saved!
Your biggest failure is to understand the prepositions of the koine Greek, which you are using the KJV and far from that form of Greek.
You are attempting to define word for word but that is not how JOHN wrote it. Whenever one uses the koine Greek, they will use a multitude of prepositions. And since you choose to lack the understanding concerning this, you will always be INCORRECT.
The Scholars and Theologians cannot be heresy or they would not be in their profession.
So using their definitions is the same as pure 100% solid gold.
The father did not have the faith anywhere. He said to Jesus, "IF" you cannot heal.
It would help if you did not assume everything corrective was towards yourself.
My apologies. I did not realise that posts to someone on my ignore list would still appear on my screen.
Learning to read would greatly increase your potential to know the truth.
22 ......but if in any way thou canst, have pity on us and help us.
23 But Jesus said to him: What is this “If thou canst”? All things are possible to him that believes.
canst = cannot, not can
Yes, it actually is. Perhaps people need to read updated versions if they don't understand old English.
I am not using the KJV, so it's not old English being translated here.
canst = cannot
And Jesus is still answering like he has no faith.
23 But Jesus said to him: What is this “If thou canst”? All things are possible to him that believes.
So we know it's a lack of faith here being said by the father to Jesus.