Fails on basic morality

[Thunderrr-mental]

This should help you.

.

This should help you.

this is a child.

Why would you follow a child's logic

 

[Cameron143]

Morality would be my standard, as it doesn't involve human ownership. Would you rather be owned by another human, beaten with a weapon and inherited or free?

You didn't answer my question. You have shared a vision of morality. My question is: is your standard only yours or your standard applies to all?

 

[Real5]

why ask moral questions questions based on a fictional book.

What is the logic in this ?

To show it's fiction. Obviously.

 

[Dino246]

To show it's fiction. Obviously.

But you have failed. Obviously.

 

[Thunderrr-mental]

To show it's fiction. Obviously.

But your not acting if your showing fiction.

Your acting if your showing shocking immorality

As you said I cant belief nobody is condemning this.

 

[Real5]

You didn't answer my question. You have shared a vision of morality. My question is: is your standard only yours or your standard applies to all?

It should apply to a moral human.

 

[Thunderrr-mental]

To show it's fiction. Obviously.

do you see how far your logic has drifted from reality

 

[Dino246]

It should apply to a moral human.

What is a "moral human"? What basis of morality separates a "moral human" from any other kind of human?

 

[Thunderrr-mental]

It should apply to a moral human.

but again you believe it's fiction.

This would be losing touch with reality if you believe fiction is shocking.

 

[Real5]

What is a "moral human"? What basis of morality separates a "moral human" from any other kind of human?

One that doesn't own another as property. SMH.

 

[Real5]

but again you believe it's fiction.

This would be losing touch with reality if you believe fiction is shocking.

Fiction can be shocking.

 

[Cameron143]

It should apply to a moral human.

Why is your standard the correct one?

 

[Thunderrr-mental]

Fiction can be shocking.

Fiction can be shocking.

fiction is make believe. Why would it be shocking.

I mean if you know it's fiction why let it shock you.

Do you believe you have a free mind.

Free to think free to talk free to do what you want when you want

 

[Dino246]

One that doesn't own another as property. SMH.

"SMH": what a stupid response.

You are bereft of any basis for morality, but pretend that you are superior on the basis of one single issue. I've met five-year-olds with better reasoning skills.

 

[Real5]

Why is your standard the correct one?

As a human isn't property of another human. Why? As humans are not objects you own, beat with weapon and your children inherit as they are your property. SMH.

 

[Real5]

fiction is make believe. Why would it be shocking.

I mean if you know it's fiction why let it shock you.

Do you believe you have a free mind.

Free to think free to talk free to do what you want when you want

As it creates shock value.

 

[Dino246]

As a human isn't property of another human. Why? As humans are not objects you own, beat with weapon and your children inherit as they are your property. SMH.

The slave owners would disagree with you. What makes "your" morality any better than theirs?

 

[Real5]

The slave owners would disagree with you. What makes "your" morality any better than theirs?

Told you countless times. As a human is not property you own. Why? The only proper treatment of slaves is their freedom. As it's moral.

 

[Thunderrr-mental]

As it creates shock value.

honestly I'm tired of your games now.

Your worse than my kids. Anyhow I'm back at work tomorrow so speaking of morals I must dash.

But do your self a favour read the book of John.

Stop being the kid who knows it all.

It's not nice or good to attack people's beliefs. People need hope of a saviour and salvation.

Your to young to understand spiritual discernment.

And your to young to know the spiritual world.

But your not to young to be told to grow up and quit attacking Christianity.

 

[Cameron143]

As a human isn't property of another human. Why? As humans are not objects you own, beat with weapon and your children inherit as they are your property. SMH.

Your missing the point or avoiding the question one. You said the standard you use to determine right and wrong is yours. That makes you a lawgiver. I'm wondering if your laws apply only to yourself or to everyone. So do you set the standard? Who decides the standard if not you? And by what authority is your standard given?