I agree. It was rather crass, actually.I haven't seen any reason to think your assertion has any validity.
I agree. It was rather crass, actually.I haven't seen any reason to think your assertion has any validity.
What was Hosea told by God to name his children by Gomer?Sure. Did he marry Gomer? Was she a prostitute?
In Isaiah 20 God says Isaiah went about naked for 3 years as a sign against Egypt and Ethiopia. Isaiah probably ignored it and actually wore a 3 piece suit.What was Hosea told by God to name his children by Gomer?
Gomer bore a son in Hosea 1:4, where it says,
And the Lord said to him, “Call his name Jezreel, for in just a little while I will punish the house
of Jehu for the blood of Jezreel, and I will put an end to the kingdom of the house of Israel.”
She conceived again and bore a daughter. And the Lord said to him, “Call her name No Mercy,
for I will no more have mercy on the house of Israel, to forgive them at all.” (Hosea 1:6)
When she had weaned No Mercy, she conceived and bore a son. And the Lord said, “Call his
name Not My People, for you are not my people, and I am not your God.” (Hosea 1:8-9)
These were God's judgments against Israel for their WHORING after other gods/false idols.
Oh! Unless you are (a) Bible_Highlighter...
Yes, I mentioned that directive from God to Isaiah earlier...In Isaiah 20 God says Isaiah went about naked for 3 years as a sign against Egypt
and Ethiopia. Isaiah probably ignored it and actually wore a 3 piece suit.
Sorry to steal your thunder. I'll repurpose it for you....According to Isaiah 20 and @Magenta, Isaiah....Yes, I mentioned that directive from God to Isaiah earlier...
but, a Bible_Highlighter would surely say it wasn't so!
Eh? You did not steal my thunder. You added lightning! .Sorry to steal your thunder. I'll repurpose it for you....According to Isaiah 20 and @Magenta, Isaiah....

I provided the Scripture already for this. You haven’t responded.Please provide verse number citations for your belief on what the book of Hosea says. In other words, you are summarizing what Scripture says in your own words and you are not quoting Scripture. Someone can come to false conclusions about a book in the Bible. So the burden of proof is on you to prove your case with Scripture.
No, she wasn't already a prostitute
You said:but she was promiscuous. Whoredom can mean both idolatry and sexual immorality.
You said:There are other harlots in the Bible who married into the Jewish lineage- Rahab and Tamar are two.
You said:Also, Ruth was from Moab and they had fallen into idolatry but she made a vow before she married (to Naomi's God) and Boaz and he could see she was virtuous.
You said:Israelites had previously married Moabites. (They were children of incest - Lot had children with his own daughters)
You said:Don't confuse Ruth and Boaz's story with Hosea and Gomer.
In Isaiah 20 God says Isaiah went about naked for 3 years as a sign against Egypt and Ethiopia. Isaiah probably ignored it and actually wore a 3 piece suit.
Already you are changing the text.Psalms 12:5 (KJV) says of the oppressed godly man “…saith the Lord, I will set him in safety…” 12:6 says God’s words are pure (true), and 12:7 says He keeps (performs) them forever.
I don’t see that, and the text says nothing about “our very existence”.Deliverance of the godly is stressed, but that’s only an object of God’s words ensuring deliverance (and our very existence), and the main emphasis is on what “saith the Lord,” His words that promise deliverance.
Your position makes no sense in light of the three words, “from this generation”. Mine does. There is nothing whatsoever in the text about the written form of the text… not even a hint. The whole Psalm is about God caring for the oppressed; why would the words about preservation suddenly refer His words and not the people? Frankly, that’s silly.12:7 stresses God keeping and preserving “them,” His words certifying His care of the righteous, not only in David’s time, but forever. The declared eternal preservation emphasizes the written form of His words certifying deliverance of the righteous today and forever.
You did not provide a proper citation, and your argument actually supports my position.It’s said 12:7 “them” is 12:5 people, but “them” loses its certainty of meaning if it’s separated from its immediate antecedent “words” in 12:6, for if people were meant, the text would confuse the pronoun reference (12:6 shifts the emphasis from people to words). Those who say “them” is people dismiss the antecedent factor, saying gender discord denies a reference to “words,” for in 12:7 “them” (verb suffix) is masculine, and 12:6 “words” (substantive) is feminine.
I find it odd that other KJV-only folks aren’t jumping in to support you on this. Perhaps yours is the anomaly view.I am just telling you what one side primarily believes, which should trouble you.
You need a specific verse or word connection to prove she was only promiscuous.
So now you are saying that Gomer is a harlot? That is a prostitute. Even the word "harlot" in the Bible is used as a prostitute (Especially Genesis 38 and Judges 16.
But yes, Rahab was a prostitute. Most Christians know this basic fact. But she was not a practicing prostitute when she married. She gave that life up to serve the Living God. A person can repent, and change their ways. This is not a problem. We are talking about how most of Christianity holds to the view that God told Hosea to marry a practicing prostitute. Now, if she had a change of heart, that would be different.
Yes, most Christians are familiar with the Ruth narrative.
The point here is that Gomer was a woman of idolatry and not prostitution.
She would have had to deny serving those false idols and serve the one true God in order to marry Hosea.
Not sure your point in bringing this up.
Why would you say that? I am not confusing the two. You would only be assuming that I am.
Well I guess we can be confident that if people would stick with the KJV we would never have aberrant and heretical groups starting.I am not saying it is going to happen, but Modern Bibles and Modern scholarship can lead folks astray to believe exceptionally wrong things.
you are confusing yourself about the timing of Gomers harlotry.I am just telling you what one side primarily believes, which should trouble you.
You need a specific verse or word connection to prove she was only promiscuous.
So now you are saying that Gomer is a harlot? That is a prostitute. Even the word "harlot" in the Bible is used as a prostitute (Especially Genesis 38 and Judges 16.
But yes, Rahab was a prostitute. Most Christians know this basic fact. But she was not a practicing prostitute when she married. She gave that life up to serve the Living God. A person can repent, and change their ways. This is not a problem. We are talking about how most of Christianity holds to the view that God told Hosea to marry a practicing prostitute. Now, if she had a change of heart, that would be different.
Yes, most Christians are familiar with the Ruth narrative.
The point here is that Gomer was a woman of idolatry and not prostitution.
She would have had to deny serving those false idols and serve the one true God in order to marry Hosea.
Not sure your point in bringing this up.
Why would you say that? I am not confusing the two. You would only be assuming that I am.
A number of people has and he still denies it says what it does.I provided the Scripture already for this. You haven’t responded.
Where do you get your statistics? .We are talking about how most of Christianity holds to the view that God told Hosea to marry a practicing prostitute.
A number of people has and he still denies it says what it does.
Where do you get your statistics? .![]()
God told Hosea to marry a whore than.
You said:what is it with people. Is it an objection to the word prostitute or people just dont want whore to mean what it does. Especially when Gomer conceives three children to her lovers but is married to Hosea.
To begin with, it is important to realize this command could be understood two different ways.I’ve talked to various Christians over the years on this. I talked to them on different Christian forums, and to Christians at work. Whenever you search for an article on this topic online, the view that ”God told Hosea to marry a prostitute” is the most prominent in the search results.
understood brother I appreciate your discernment toI am grateful for your support and how you speak as if my efforts and everything I have been going through because of it has meaning as my greatest fear and worry is that it was all for nothing that I believed and spoke in vain how often I ask him whay was the point what good did we do was it all just pointless I blame and attack myself a lot often asking if I was just deluded yes I believed I dared to believe in things that would surpase what we call faith the deeper depyjd of hid heart the hidden truth of his being his kingdom I encountered him saw many visions which I have openly spoken on here in fact I willingly recieved all the doubt all the attacks all the name calling because his kingdom who he really is the the trhing he allowed me to experience and know I spoke on here freely it is no secret I always say I am an open book and based on what I say and how I respond I am sure many can easiliy see this.
I don't see the point in hiding anything and I only hope that for every suffering for everything I have to deal with in life will be a testimony of him otherwise my entire life has been a waste I went through utter hell for nothing.
But I am not one who is strong on their own I actually find strength through the strength of others not the other way around I know there are true prophets but something I asked God last night was if these prophets were listening to him why couldn't they hear me?
I was in bed my heart crying out echoinh words I could not express the pain the unfairness the abandomnent the the deep inner damage and sores that at this point I don't know if they can be healed yet there is a fire in me still I was never able to truly give up but surely God would have let someone know what I was going through surely these people who claim to know his voice would have listened to him.
But not a single one not a single person heard him and I highly doubt he didn't speak to people about it. as I always say the spirit speaks to the spirit