Which News do u think are Fair, Liberal-bias, Conervative-bias? (Wait for the POLL)

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Pick which one best fits each news outlet

  • AOL - Fair

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • AOL - Liberal biased

    Votes: 8 66.7%
  • AOL - Conservative biased

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Yahoo - Fair

    Votes: 2 16.7%
  • Yahoo - Liberal biased

    Votes: 8 66.7%
  • Yahoo - Conservative biased

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • CNN - Fair

    Votes: 2 16.7%
  • CNN - Liberal biased

    Votes: 9 75.0%
  • CNN - Conservative biased

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Fox News - Fair

    Votes: 3 25.0%
  • Fox News - Liberal biased

    Votes: 2 16.7%
  • Fox News - Conservative biased

    Votes: 8 66.7%
  • New York Times - Fair

    Votes: 1 8.3%
  • New York Times - Liberal biased

    Votes: 10 83.3%
  • New York Times - Conservative biased

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Washington Post - Fair

    Votes: 1 8.3%
  • Washington Post - Liberal biased

    Votes: 7 58.3%
  • Washington Post - Conservative biased

    Votes: 1 8.3%

  • Total voters
    12
Aug 2, 2009
24,644
4,305
113
#1
Which News do u think are Fair, Liberal-bias, Conervative-bias? (Pleez Wait for the POLL)

There will be 3 choices for each news outlet listed in the poll
(Fair, Biased-Liberal, Biased-Conservative).
Pick which one you feel fits best for each news outlet... :rolleyes:

I'm only putting the big ones that I know of, because I don't want to take forever writing the poll :p
 
Feb 7, 2015
22,418
413
0
#2
Why do you keep putting up threads about polls without the polls.
 

Adstar

Senior Member
Jul 24, 2016
7,581
3,616
113
#3
You should have given an option ::: None is Fair ,,, thats what i would pick..
 
U

Ultimatum77

Guest
#4
They're all garbage.....I stick to allnewspipeline.com and zerohedge for my news.....the rest are mouthpieces for corporate/govt propaganda....
 

T_Laurich

Senior Member
Mar 24, 2013
3,356
122
63
30
#5
Every single one of them have a 'liberal' bias....
They call our govt. a democracy, not a republic...

No one is covering the internet bill that will give it over to a private organization for moderating without any oversight.

All of them are either endorsing Hillary Clinton (democrat) or Donald Trump ( democrat)

Snowden is a criminal on ever single outlet.... Unless they have a heavy libertarian'esque viewer base: in that case, he is a bad guy who did a thing that could be considered good...

They all report news stories made by the CIA and FBI and publish them without telling their audience where the source came from (propaganda)

None of them cover lasie fair capitalism (spelling) vs socialism...

All of them are covering up our bubble crisis, and not exploiting the fact that the stock market has been computer generated garbage for the past few years...

They have all leaned far left every election cycle... If the democrat lose, the liberal stations move more left... If the republican lose the conservative stations move more left.... The funny thing is, this fad starting catching on with people, and whenever you googled America has moved left, it would show you scholarly articles with research... Now when you google the question it just shows you news papers saying that both parties have moved right lol no sources...

I can go on and on and on and on and on....

If anyone argues that any of those websites are of the right, they either have no clue what rightwing politics are... Or they are lying.... Period.

America judges the rightwing by what the left wing looks like... So in this country we call the moderate left wing as right wing...
BTW. Every single canidate is left wing... Trump, Johnson, Jill, and Hillary.
 
Last edited:

T_Laurich

Senior Member
Mar 24, 2013
3,356
122
63
30
#7
Every news source is biased.... It's impossible not to be...
This term 'unbiased' is very new to politics, and is only a charade' to make their view point seem more truthful... Because if you don't have a bias that means your only looking at the facts and truth...
Problem is if you are a human, you have a bias.
 
J

jennymae

Guest
#8
A newspaper becomes biased the moment you start disagreeing with it:p.
 

T_Laurich

Senior Member
Mar 24, 2013
3,356
122
63
30
#9
Does a tree fall in the woods and make a sound if no one hears it?
Can a news paper be biased if you still agree with it?
 

Eli1

Well-known member
Apr 5, 2022
4,695
2,009
113
46
#10
I think that the truth is always there despite bias, interpretation, or team cheerleading. If you’re not invested in any sides, the truth should always be obvious to you, and the team’s comments should be very entertaining to say the least.

For example, let’s say that a bus crashed.

An independent news company, let’s say BBC, would report it as:
A bus crash happened on the Brooklyn bridge at 11:30AM today. 3 people died and there were many injured, latest reports say 15 injured. Cause of the crash is unknown at this point.

A right wing news company, let’s say FoxNews, would report it as:
Illegal Mexican hijacks the bus and kills 3 Christians. Why is Biden allowing this?

A left wing news company, let’s say CNN, would report it as:
White nationalist Christian, kills 3 trans people in rage argument and injures many others. Should Christians be allowed to drive?

In all these cases you know that a bus crash happened, but at this point you’re not interested in “news” anymore but entertainment, which is why all the comments besides the unbiased one, are hilarious because they add sensationalism to get a reaction out of the viewer.
 

Lynx

Folksy yet erudite
Aug 13, 2014
27,244
9,303
113
#11
That's why a true, unbiased news source would go out of business. It's not nearly entertaining enough. Nobody on either side, or even those who profess to be in the middle, would watch it.

Every news source is biased. They have to be. It's the only business model you can have if you want to stay in business.
 

Bob-Carabbio

Well-known member
Jun 24, 2020
1,602
803
113
#12
Which News do u think are Fair, Liberal-bias, Conervative-bias? (Pleez Wait for the POLL)
You forgot "NONE OF THE ABOVE". Why would I take ANY OF THEM seriously???

Generally we watch NBC news at home, mostly for the weather report, which has some real value.
 

rrcn

Active member
Oct 15, 2023
440
138
43
#13
Which News do u think are Fair, Liberal-bias, Conervative-bias? (Pleez Wait for the POLL)

There will be 3 choices for each news outlet listed in the poll (Fair, Biased-Liberal, Biased-Conservative).
Pick which one you feel fits best for each news outlet... :rolleyes:


I'm only putting the big ones that I know of, because I don't want to take forever writing the poll:p
There is a site called allsides that does attempt to find links to all three categories. They also ask for people to rate the organization’s bias.
 
G

Gojira

Guest
#14
America judges the rightwing by what the left wing looks like... So in this country we call the moderate left wing as right wing...
BTW. Every single canidate is left wing... Trump, Johnson, Jill, and Hillary.
Well, the authority has spoken! LOL
 
G

Gojira

Guest
#15
I think that the truth is always there despite bias, interpretation, or team cheerleading. If you’re not invested in any sides, the truth should always be obvious to you, and the team’s comments should be very entertaining to say the least.

For example, let’s say that a bus crashed.

An independent news company, let’s say BBC, would report it as:
A bus crash happened on the Brooklyn bridge at 11:30AM today. 3 people died and there were many injured, latest reports say 15 injured. Cause of the crash is unknown at this point.

A right wing news company, let’s say FoxNews, would report it as:
Illegal Mexican hijacks the bus and kills 3 Christians. Why is Biden allowing this?

A left wing news company, let’s say CNN, would report it as:
White nationalist Christian, kills 3 trans people in rage argument and injures many others. Should Christians be allowed to drive?

In all these cases you know that a bus crash happened, but at this point you’re not interested in “news” anymore but entertainment, which is why all the comments besides the unbiased one, are hilarious because they add sensationalism to get a reaction out of the viewer.
The BBC is not independent. They, like most European news outlets, lean Left to hard-Left.

FNC has drifted in recent years, but I will still take their coverage over most others because a) most American news outlets are anti-American, and we need a balance to that, even if it has its own faults, and b) they do defend common sense and sanity. E.g., Greg Gutfeld's commentary is amazingly spot-on and Christians and political conservatives should be in agreement with the majority of what he, Jesse Watters and others say in their monologues and reporting. When they condemn the actions of a far-left mayor releasing criminals onto the streets in the name of social justice, that's not being right-wing biased, that's being morally right and sane -- and that deserves our support.

Christians in the US need to wake up fast. The progressive Left is trying to overthrow this country and turn us into a communo-fascist dictatorship. Only FNC offers at least some commentary that counters the insanity coming from that side. No one is perfect, no news org is perfect. No politician is perfect. You take the ones that are least bad and most helpful to the Christian and American / constitutional cause, and support them.

That all being said, I also enjoy pontificators like Charlie Kirk, Ben Shapiro, Dennis Prager and Steve Turley.
 

Lynx

Folksy yet erudite
Aug 13, 2014
27,244
9,303
113
#16
You forgot "NONE OF THE ABOVE". Why would I take ANY OF THEM seriously???

Generally we watch NBC news at home, mostly for the weather report, which has some real value.
They get the weather report right? It's a TRADITION to get the weather report wrong. What are they even doing over there if they can't get it wrong? :p
 

Lynx

Folksy yet erudite
Aug 13, 2014
27,244
9,303
113
#17
The BBC is not independent. They, like most European news outlets, lean Left to hard-Left.

FNC has drifted in recent years, but I will still take their coverage over most others because a) most American news outlets are anti-American, and we need a balance to that, even if it has its own faults, and b) they do defend common sense and sanity. E.g., Greg Gutfeld's commentary is amazingly spot-on and Christians and political conservatives should be in agreement with the majority of what he, Jesse Watters and others say in their monologues and reporting. When they condemn the actions of a far-left mayor releasing criminals onto the streets in the name of social justice, that's not being right-wing biased, that's being morally right and sane -- and that deserves our support.

Christians in the US need to wake up fast. The progressive Left is trying to overthrow this country and turn us into a communo-fascist dictatorship. Only FNC offers at least some commentary that counters the insanity coming from that side. No one is perfect, no news org is perfect. No politician is perfect. You take the ones that are least bad and most helpful to the Christian and American / constitutional cause, and support them.

That all being said, I also enjoy pontificators like Charlie Kirk, Ben Shapiro, Dennis Prager and Steve Turley.
Well of COURSE you like those news sources. They say the "That evil enemy you hate is trying to destroy your way of life!" rhetoric that you just eat up.

Meanwhile liberals watch their "That really stupid enemy you hate is trying to hold us back just when we were making progress" because that's what they like to hear.

If there really was a true news source with zero bias, you would ignore it because it wouldn't spew hate and fear in the flavor you like. You'd say it was too far left because it didn't preach about the enemy out to get you. And liberals would claim it was much too far right.
 

Eli1

Well-known member
Apr 5, 2022
4,695
2,009
113
46
#18
Gojia, first i'd like to say that i realize that BBC is not truly unbiased because as Lynx said, if a news agency was truly unbiased today or without adding some "flavor" to their news, they'd be out of business.
I would say they're more sane in comparison to the rhetoric.
We both remember how MTV was back in the day for example. It was ALL music ALL day and they took 5 minutes or less to show the latest news about music and singers of the time. This is how MTV was in Europe anyway, so i don't know how it was in U.S.
But the point is, that the news were less then 5 minutes and back to music.
If the news agencies did that today, they'd be completely out of business. Just report and that's it. Nobody would watch it.

So, adding to what Lynx said on the other post about you soaking one side, i would say that you're not going to find much truth that way because in every group, out of 10 things that they might say, 8 might be garbage but 1 or 2 might be very good info to know and add to your knowledge.
I have watched The Five on Fox news or Carlton or Laura or Hanity and other pundits from the left and on both sides, besides having good laughs (it's pure comedy actually) i did learn a thing or two about important or factual things which are mentioned quikly because again, they don't sell too much and the TV station would not get a lot of viewership if they harped too much on those nice informational things.

Just my thoughts and perspective brother.
 
G

Gojira

Guest
#19
Gojia, first i'd like to say that i realize that BBC is not truly unbiased because as Lynx said, if a news agency was truly unbiased today or without adding some "flavor" to their news, they'd be out of business.
I would say they're more sane in comparison to the rhetoric.
We both remember how MTV was back in the day for example. It was ALL music ALL day and they took 5 minutes or less to show the latest news about music and singers of the time. This is how MTV was in Europe anyway, so i don't know how it was in U.S.
But the point is, that the news were less then 5 minutes and back to music.
If the news agencies did that today, they'd be completely out of business. Just report and that's it. Nobody would watch it.

So, adding to what Lynx said on the other post about you soaking one side, i would say that you're not going to find much truth that way because in every group, out of 10 things that they might say, 8 might be garbage but 1 or 2 might be very good info to know and add to your knowledge.
I have watched The Five on Fox news or Carlton or Laura or Hanity and other pundits from the left and on both sides, besides having good laughs (it's pure comedy actually) i did learn a thing or two about important or factual things which are mentioned quikly because again, they don't sell too much and the TV station would not get a lot of viewership if they harped too much on those nice informational things.

Just my thoughts and perspective brother.
And that's fine. Respect on CC... a new concept :D

I do have a different take on this, as you know. I do not live with the BBC on, so there's no way I can analyze it with a totally informed mind. However, whatever I've heard from them is generally anti-American, anti-traditional. The same holds true for the corrupt NY Times, Washington Post, Guardian, etc. (I say "traditional" as a born-againer and as someone who believes in the US constitution.)

I am also not unaware of even my favorite media sources' biases. I know FNC leans right -- even though lately it seems to be caving to woke pressures.. not a good sign. But, you have to go somewhere, and find something / someone you trust, and use your own reason to filter out the garbage. Also, it is good to know history. This way, you yourself may be better equipped to analyze current events.

What I see today has the hallmarks of a Chinese-esque cultural revolution. This is not just here, but in many western countries previously opposed to the Soviet Union during the Cold War. "Social justice" riots (antifa/BLM) resemble Hitler's SA, Mussolini's Black Shirts and Mao's Red Guard. Dividing a society up and creating strife and division through oppressor / victim (used to be class, now it's race, sexual orientation, etc.) is also classically Marxist. Using instruments of justice to punish political opponents, creating / exploiting crises to create fear in the public so they submit to authorities, creating chaos in the streets by letting criminals out, etc., all communo-fascist tactics.

All of this and more is showing a dark authoritarian revolution taking place, and only FNC, Ben Shapiro, Charlie Kirk, etc., are doing anything to call it out. The other "news" sources in this thread's poll are throwing all of this cover and trying to make the conservative elements look like the "enemies of democracy". This is also a Saul Alinsky tactic of accusing your opposition of what you are doing, and it shows that much of the media in the US (and arguably elsewhere) is the enemy of the people, not a watchdog for them.
 

Bob-Carabbio

Well-known member
Jun 24, 2020
1,602
803
113
#20
They get the weather report right? It's a TRADITION to get the weather report wrong. What are they even doing over there if they can't get it wrong? :p
It's a lot easier to be accurate in Texas.