Predestination; are fates set in some cases?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Aug 27, 2023
823
211
43
#1
1:5 KJV “Before I formed thee in the belly I knew thee; and before thou camest forth out of the womb I sanctified thee, and I ordained thee a prophet unto the nations.”

The answer is YES but it is very hard to prove. Predestination touches on truths in a way that most people cannot fathom nor would be willing to accept, though the Bible is really all about predestination.

It's about - who is forever - and who is not forever. I think that what happened in rebellion sealed many fates; and that people today, as we know them, must just simply live it out; else the below Scriptures do not seem fair:​
John 6:44
44 No man can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw him: and I will raise him up at the last day. (KJV)
John 3:16
16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. (KJV)​
The irony.
That there are some that were to be born into their fate is clear:​
Jude 4
4 For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness, and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ. KJV​
My opinion, drawn from the totality of the Scriptures; and admittedly not able to be documented by any one Scripture alone, as would have been desired; is that certain were fated to work for satan, and certain were destined to work for God; and between these two groups lies the overwhelming majority of people who have choice and free will.
Those that I refer to as satan's, would be the Kenites; and those that I refer to as God's, would be what we (sometimes confusingly) refer to as God's Elect.​
NOTE: Please do not confuse "God's Elect" with all Christians. And please understand that many times all Christians are referred to as the Elect, but that within that group is a body of individuals that were afore-ordained to work for God.​
Many people read the scriptures wherein it mentions "the Elect" and "the Elect Lady," etc., and suppose that this is not speaking of the general body of Christians, but only of a sub-group. This is an error. All Christians are Elect, but there is a sub-group of these Elect that is ordained from before the world began to work the purpose of God. The difficulty is in how to know when it is speaking of the main group or when it is speaking of the sub-group.

The bottom line is that God is fair; and that if there are some "who were before of old ordained to this condemnation", and there are, then it is because of what they did in the rebellion of the First Earth Age. What is the condemnation? Observe as the Master tells us:
John 3:17-21
17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.
18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.
19 And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil.
20 For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved.
21 But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God. KJV
Jude 4
4 For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness, and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ. KJV​
Ephesians 4
4 According as he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before him in love:

To arrive at the true meaning of this expression, we must note that there are two words translated "foundation" in the New Testament:
(1) themelios, and
(2) katabole.​
The Noun, themelios,
occurs in Luke 6:48-49, 14:29, Acts 16:26, Romans 15:20,1Corinthians 3:l0-12, Ephesians 2:20, 1Timothy 6:19, 2Timothy 2:19, Hebrews 6:1, 11:10, Revelation 21:14,19. It is never used of the world (kosmos) or the earth (ge). The corresponding Verb (themelioo) occurs in Matthew 7:25, Luke 6:48, Ephesians 3:17, Colossians 1:23, Hebrews 1:10 and 1Peter 5:10. The verb is only once used of the earth (ge). Hebrews 1:10.
A comparison of all these passages will show that these are proper and regular terms for the English words "to found", and "foundation".​
The Noun, katabole,
occurs in Matthew 13:35, 25:34, Luke 11:50, John 17:24, Ephesians 1:4, Hebrews 4:3, 9:26 , 11:11, 1Peter 1:20, Revelation 13:8, 17:8 and the corresponding Verb (kataballo) occurs in 2Corinthians 4:9, Hebrews 6:1 and Revelation 12:10.
A comparison of all these passages (especially 2Corinthians 4:9and Revelation 12:10) will show that kataballo and katabole are not the proper terms for founding and foundation, but the correct meaning is casting down, or overthrow.
“Consistency, therefore, calls for the same translation in Hebrews 6:1, where, instead of "not laying again", the rendering should be "not casting down". That is to say, the foundation already laid, of repentance, etc., was not to be cast down or overthrown, but was to be left and progress made unto the perfection.
Accordingly, the Noun katabole, derived from, and cognate with the Verb, ought to be translated "disruption", or "ruin".
The remarkable thing is that in all occurrences (except Hebrews 11:11) the word is connected with "the world" (Greek kosmos. Appendix 129.1), and therefore the expression should be rendered "the disruption (or ruin) of the world", clearly referring to the condition indicated in Genesis 1:2, and described in 2Peter 3:5-6. For the earth was not created tohu (Isaiah 45:18) but became so, as stated in the Hebrew of Genesis 1:2and confirmed by 2Peter 3:6, where "the world that then was by the word of God" (Genesis 1:1), perished and "the heavens and the earth which are now, by the same word" were created (Genesis 2:4), and are "kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment" (2Peter 3:7) which shall usher in the "new heavens and the new earth" of 2Peter 3:13.
"The disruption of the world" is an event forming a great dividing line in the dispensations of the ages. In Genesis 1:1 we have the founding of the world (Hebrews 1:10 = themelioo), but in Genesis 1:2 we have its overthrow.
This is confirmed by a further remarkable fact, that the phrase, which occurs ten times, is associated with the Preposition apo = from (Appendix 104. iv) seven times, and with pro = before (Appendix 104. xiv) three times. The former refers to the kingdom, and is connected with the "counsels" of God; the latter refers to the Mystery (or Secret; See Appendix 193) and is connected with the "purpose" of God (see John 17:24, Ephesians 1:4, 1Peter 1:20).
Ample New Testament testimony is thus given to the profoundly significant fact recorded in Genesis 1:2, that "the earth became tohu and bohu (i.e. waste and desolate); and darkness was on the face of the deep", before the creation of "the heavens and the earth which are now"(2Peter 3:7). “ EW~Bullinger
 
E

evyaniy

Guest
#4

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
59,815
29,194
113
#5
Totally agree and it is not the first time. Isn't there some word for that?
Plagiarism? Though links back to original (?) site are included throughout the text...
 
E

evyaniy

Guest
#6
Siri could do better. She would at least tell you she found it.
 
E

evyaniy

Guest
#7
Tired of all the hot button arguments anyhow. Divinity then Salvation by Grace through Faith and now Predestination and Election.
 
E

evyaniy

Guest
#8
Can we do the Law again? Still trying to figure out what Torah observant means for a believer. No one will say with any clarity. But they like to claim it. Till they change their tune to work a different angle.
 
E

evyaniy

Guest
#9
and they have all day every day to work it.
 
E

evyaniy

Guest
#10
we can do we are still under Torah law but maybe just some aspects of it as part of Salvation. Or we can do yes we may be saved by Grace through Faith but need to work hard enough to keep it. Or we can do Yes, He is the Son of God but didn't exist till He was conceived or maybe at the creation. or we can do Romans 9, 10 and 11 and Jacob have I loved but Esau I have hated. That should fill up the schedule for a while.
 

Aaron56

Well-known member
Jul 12, 2021
2,749
1,573
113
#11
Can we do the Law again? Still trying to figure out what Torah observant means for a believer. No one will say with any clarity. But they like to claim it. Till they change their tune to work a different angle.
If you wrote a book entitled “The Pre-tribber‘s Guide to Predestination and Eternally Conscious Torment: How the Law of Moses is for Today (Even if You are 1/2 Demon 1/2 Human) as Explained by the King James Version of the Bible Only. Volume 1: Why You’re Going to Hell and I’m Not” you could cover a lot of ground.
 
E

evyaniy

Guest
#12
if everyone else stops talking they can talk amongst themselves. Here is a subject. Why do we get so ferklempt at times?
 
E

evyaniy

Guest
#13
If you wrote a book entitled “The Pre-tribber‘s Guide to Predestination and Eternally Conscious Torment: How the Law of Moses is for Today (Even if You are 1/2 Demon 1/2 Human) as Explained by the King James Version of the Bible Only. Volume 1: Why You’re Going to Hell and I’m Not” you could cover a lot of ground.
The pre-tribbers debate is not a hot button for them. It does not offend the faith of as many. most don't care about positions on that since it is not essential doctrine. But that is a great book idea.
 
E

evyaniy

Guest
#15
It has been refreshing to see many believers rally for what they believe. So it has not been a total waste of time and effort. Maybe the intended affect will backfire. One can hope.
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
59,815
29,194
113
#16
If you wrote a book entitled “The Pre-tribber‘s Guide to Predestination and Eternally Conscious Torment:
How the Law of Moses is for Today (Even if You are 1/2 Demon 1/2 Human) as Explained by the King James
Version of the Bible Only. Volume 1: Why You’re Going to Hell and I’m Not” you could cover a lot of ground.
I think he should call it:

“The Pre-tribber‘s Guide to Predestination and Eternally Conscious Torment: How the Law of Moses is
for Today (Even if You are 1/2 Demon 1/2 Human - But Don't Worry, Be Happy, Because Some Day You
Will Be An Angel... Again!!!)) as Explained by the King James Version of the Bible Only. Volume 1: Why
You’re Going to Hell and I’m Not, According To The White Jesus”
 
E

evyaniy

Guest
#17
some Sunday go to meeting humor to make them giggle in the pews. the preach may think they are laughing at him/her/whatever.
 
E

evyaniy

Guest
#18
Sidetracked just when we were about to solve predestination and election too. Guess that may have to wait a little longer.
 
Aug 27, 2023
823
211
43
#19
Please, if you are simply going to cut and paste from other sites (and perhaps other people) or entire passages from books (like Appendix 146 from The Companion Bible) site your sources.

I found your post with proper citations here: https://christinprophecyblog.org/2013/06/creation-training-the-age-of-the-earth/
I did site the source, and I left links… So what are you talking about? If you are unable to give an adequate response don’t attempt to slander me for your own lack of knowledge.

Notice… You did not even attempt to respond or give an opinion on the topic… The source I clearly referenced was out of your league and damaged your fragile ego.

Not to mention I didn’t get the info from the site you provided. Anything else?
 
Aug 27, 2023
823
211
43
#20
Siri could do better. She would at least tell you she found it.
Then go spend your day speaking with Siri.
I only posted the topic because someone else was thinking about starting the same topic, and I had a bit of a head start.

I can post that conversation, then what?
Will you claim that person is an advocate of your hot topic nonsense claims.

Every time someone post regarding a subject you are unfamiliar with, you deem the the thread as nonsensical. You do this often which leads one to believe you are unfamiliar with many things. Hot button topic? Exactly when you can’t keep up you deem the topic hot button… just sad!

You simply don’t want people to discuss things you know nothing about. Not gonna happen!