You could care less, or you couldn't care less? .![]()
Don't bother me a bit. So far, I have received 297 of them.I see that Red X bother a lot of people here.
Why do Red exes bother you?
I could care less. Or is that, I couldn't care less?I am going with this...
Both Merriam-Webster and dictionary.com have weighed in and say “could care less” and “couldn’t care less” mean the same thing. Their reasoning is that both phrases are informal, English is often illogical, and people use the two phrases in the same way. “Could care less” has come to mean the same thing as “couldn’t care less.”
I could care less. Or is that, I couldn't care less?
But it's still wrong. Like "wicked" might be used to mean "good", but that isn't technically what "wicked" means. IMHO.I am going with this...
Both Merriam-Webster and dictionary.com have weighed in and say “could care less” and “couldn’t care less” mean the same thing. Their reasoning is that both phrases are informal, English is often illogical, and people use the two phrases in the same way. “Could care less” has come to mean the same thing as “couldn’t care less.”
But isn't that part of the fun when someone is ignoring one for no reason? To still get to mark his work (with a big, red X if it's wrong, as it very likely is, else why would he have ignored one in the first place - however - little did he know, he can run, but he can't hide! Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha! *maniacal laughter*)I wish that when I put someone on Ignore that I can't even see an emoji that they might leave on my post.
But it's still wrong. Like "wicked" might be used to mean "good", but that isn't technically what "wicked" means. IMHO.
Emojis are seen on the post even If the person leaving the emoji Is on Ignore though I believe.That is true.
However, I think he looks/un-ignores and then sees the red x's.
Emojis are seen on the post even If the person leaving the emoji Is on Ignore though I believe.
Just be careful that when someone that you already have on Ignore Is leaving red x’s on your post they might be trying to needle you Into taking them off Ignore so that you can respond to them and so that they can irritate you Into saying something So bad that they have a good reason now with evidence to report you and get you banned.But isn't that part of the fun when someone is ignoring one for no reason? To still get to mark his work (with a big, red X if it's wrong, as it very likely is, else why would he have ignored one in the first place - however - little did he know, he can run, but he can't hide! Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha! *maniacal laughter*)
Sometimes, it can even tempt him into un-ignoring one, and then one can begin again to explain to the Ignorant One the error of his ways.
As stated before, if you have someone on ignore, and leave them on ignore, you shouldn't be seeing anything by them, including emojis.
If you take them off ignore, even temporarily, of course you'll see everything.
What he was trying to say was not at all clear to me. Yours is the first post where I get his point.The point is that the red X's will still added on, and if you click on "show all" you can see the emoji.
I just checked I can see the emoji on the post given by someone I have on ignore and I have not remove the ignore since I have had the person on ignore.
So @seed_time_harvest is correct.
Only if you "Show all" to see who gave you what emoji. Then they all show up.Emojis are seen on the post even If the person leaving the emoji Is on Ignore though I believe.
Most of the time I will click on the ( show all ) Icon at the bottom of a post to see who may have left a like or dislike,ect…on the post especially If there Is a red x there, out of curiosity and I would think that most members will do that.Only if you "Show all" to see who gave you what emoji. Then they all show up.
Probably also if you select, Show ignored content, at the bottom of the page.