Google 'Republican Jesus'. The results would be amusing if they weren't so true.you've completely lost the gospel and become instead a 'republican'. That's the problem.
Gee if only God had warned us.
Oh wait ... He did!
Google 'Republican Jesus'. The results would be amusing if they weren't so true.you've completely lost the gospel and become instead a 'republican'. That's the problem.
I guess will see who goes to jail for TRYING too steal an election.All we need to hear from you is that you agree that Brandon is an election stealer, influence peddler, crook, fraud, grifter, mentally and physically senile, and liar. This assessment predicated upon overwhelming evidence.
Once we get that admission, then we will know that your intentions are pure.
No argument there. Unfortunately, the nuts and bolts of living in the here and now burdens our conscience with the dire responsibility to vote the best possible candidate into office that we can.It has always been spiritual, and that's why Christianianity should never be mixed with secular politics.
Repubs are a disaster too. What a joke.Google 'Republican Jesus'. The results would be amusing if they weren't so true.
Gee if only God had warned us.
Oh wait ... He did!
Point 1 - there is no best candidate. There is only the lesser evil. Nowadays our vote is most often cast against someone, rather than for someone.No argument there. Unfortunately, the nuts and bolts of living in the here and now burdens our conscience with the dire responsibility to vote the best possible candidate into office that we can.
I am thinking that the most important vote of all is for your own community school board. Try and weed out the ideological nutters if at all possible. The "three R's" only and forget about this absurd social programming business.
Hardly. That was the last time prices went up and we were told jobs weren't coming back.i think you have completely forgotten about the Obama presidency.
I would opine that Pence fits the "Judas typology" better than the rest of Trumps feckless team of deep state acolytes.He already did, after voting for him twice. His response to losing was 100% juvenile.
Anyone who faithfully served him, and worked hard to get and keep him elected, became an instant Judas for saying he lost the election.
He’s a petulant child who turns on you if you dare dissent, and speak your mind.
Only the mob and cults work this way, where no dissent to the leader is allowed.
I just wanted to know if you knew what the law actually was and could explain it in layman's terms to make a judgment as to whether the charge was even applicable in the case against Trump.You're asking me a question that I gave you the source to that explained those laws that were allegedly broken by Donald Trump so all I can tell you Is that I can read It too you but I can't understand It for you.
Pretty convenient that All of them all the sudden became deepstate Judases once they said he lost.I would opine that Pence fits the "Judas typology" better than the rest of Trumps feckless team of deep state acolytes.
I would opine that Pence fits the "Judas typology" better than the rest of Trumps feckless team of deep state acolytes.He already did, after voting for him twice. His response to losing was 100% juvenile.
Anyone who faithfully served him, and worked hard to get and keep him elected, became an instant Judas for saying he lost the election.
He’s a petulant child who turns on you if you dare dissent, and speak your mind.
Only the mob and cults work this way, where no dissent to the leader is allowed.
If it were me, I would have cleaned house. Fired them all and replaced them with real patriotic "untouchables" who are filled with righteous zeal for the law and justice. And I mean doing their job with the greatest fidelity and good conscience. Not mere robotic "yes men".
I think you are smart enough to read It and understand It on your own without me trying to be your teacher able to teach any child,I mean we are both adults already my friend.I just wanted to know if you knew what the law actually was and could explain it in layman's terms to make a judgment as to whether the charge was even applicable in the case against Trump.
Are you able to do that?
These facts are indisputable:Pretty convenient that All of them all the sudden became deepstate Judases once they said he lost.
Trump = Judas/Deepstate
Barr = Judas/Deepstate
His appointed judges who tossed out his cases = Judas/Deepstate
All of his chosen staff, advisers who said he lost = Judas/Deepstate
I mean ALL of them?
It’s just convenient. Just a little, yeah?
It’s as if the only way to keep out of the Judas/Deepstate zone is to say Trump isn’t wrong.
These facts are indisputable:
1) Trump won the election. Probably in close to a landslide.
2) Trump, presently a candidate for POTUS, is suffering UNPRECEDENTED persecution/prosecution meant to destroy him as a political
opponent, all of which is patently illegal and absurd, and is an assault against the very bedrock of the Republic.
3) Biden is guilty as hell for NUMEROUS high crimes and misdemeanors, including treason.
You must needs temper your assessment of the situation thusly, for surely all of this is true.
Seriously cross-examine all the election was stolen stuff. You’ll see it was all nonsense, except for the Hunter Biden laptop thing. Don’t believe something is true, just because you want it to be true. I wanted the steal to be true also, but after doing research I found it isn’t.These facts are indisputable:
1) Trump won the election. Probably in close to a landslide.
2) Trump, presently a candidate for POTUS, is suffering UNPRECEDENTED persecution/prosecution meant to destroy him as a political
opponent, all of which is patently illegal and absurd, and is an assault against the very bedrock of the Republic.
3) Biden is guilty as hell for NUMEROUS high crimes and misdemeanors, including treason.
You must needs temper your assessment of the situation thusly, for surely all of this is true.
"Not mere robotic "yes men". "By that you obviously mean people who won’t dissent, since you’ve clearly showed a sign of being a Judas or a deepstate acolyte is dissenting from Trump.
And Trump says he chooses the best people and since he chose all these people,what are we to learn from that example?Pretty convenient that All of them all the sudden became deepstate Judases once they said he lost.
Trump = Judas/Deepstate
Barr = Judas/Deepstate
His appointed judges who tossed out his cases = Judas/Deepstate
All of his chosen staff, advisers who said he lost = Judas/Deepstate
I mean ALL of them?
It’s just convenient. Just a little, yeah?
It’s as if the only way to keep out of the Judas/Deepstate zone is to say Trump isn’t wrong.
Exacty! That’s just my point. They were all THE chosen BEST people, until they dissented.And Trump says he chooses the best people and since he chose all these people,what are we to learn from that example?![]()