This could explain what Clinton meant when he said "I did not have sex with that woman". He wasn't talking about Monica, he was talking about Hillary!
Did man land on the moon?
- Thread starter PC123
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
G
Gojira
Guest
No, are you saying the principles of light and exposure are different on the moon?
I'm more concerned by the possibility humans have been created with there emotions removed to house demons, so the demon has complete control of the body, and sets himself up as a world leader playing God.
Because they've already cloned a sheep.
It could be one of our world leaders is already a clone if not more swapped over by a terrorist organisation somehow,
because they happen more so when a comet is passing over to which can be viewed at certain times of the year
From certain places where you can see what appears to look like shooting stars and upto 100 times a day.
You can get big money for finding a meteor to.
I watch American pawnbrokers when they buy one and a scientist comes in and proves it is a rock from unknown origin and has the hallmarks of something that has passed through the the earth's atmosphere.
There is evidence of something moving in the sky. There is insufficient evidence to prove the object seen in the sky is the same ISS propagandised on television.
There are plenty of places on Earth man is not allowed to explore. Criminals commit crimes even where police are able to obtain warrants. I'm not sure why you should think that with billions of dollars in taxpayer funding and access to areas restricted by military, NASA and its employees/accomplices would be unable to forge pictures of a moon landing.
You are thinking of Earth in terms of Heliocentric assumptions. There is no such thing as "space", hence man can't get there. There is a firmament separating the waters above from the waters below, hence (presumably), man can't even get to the waters above. Hence, no pictures of Earth from the imaginary "space", first because it doesn't exist, and second because the firmament likely would prevent his entry into the water's above.
There is no evidence of the curvature of Earth (except for the demonstrably fraudulent pictures from NASA). Why therefore should anyone believe the Earth is anything other than flat?
I don't deny shooting stars, but what evidence is there that the shooting stars we see are meteors? You yourself admit meteorites are very rare to find. It could be they are different phenomena, with a similar light pattern.
Just because a rock's origin is unknown doesn't mean it has passed through the Earth's atmosphere. There's a big assumption, and in my opinion, inadequate proof, to the claim that so-called meteors come from "space".
Wow a new conspiracy theory! The laws of physics are different on the moon than on earth!
Not only so but the only way to check it out is to go to the moon.
So he can make this claim without going to the moon but unless you go to the moon you can't disprove it.
Ha, ha. You know that was a Seinfeld episode? Wouldn't surprise me much if there was truth to the story.
That's strange!
While I don't really want to be involved in a discussion on moon-landing conspiracies, I do enjoy y'all's banter... but this state I feel compelled to address.
I was a professional photographer and find this to be categorically untrue. If one were to set their exposure for the (alleged) images... the stars would not be seen, and would be consistent with the images that I have seen.
Had they wanted to take images of space from the moon, then yes... they would have been amazing.
https://www.sciencefocus.com/news/perseid-meteor-shower-2023/
Perseid meteor shower 2023 tonight: How to see spectacular shooting stars
By
Published: 17th July, 2023 at 18:00
Try 3 issues of BBC Science Focus Magazine for £5!
The Perseid meteor shower begins tonight, and unlike last year, viewing conditions are set to be excellent. It’s one of the best meteor showers of the year: here’s how and when to watch
- Share on facebook
- Share on twitter
- Share on whatsapp
- Share on reddit
- Email to a friend
I am not disputing the fact that they might want the Earth to pop out and so made their photo to not pick up the stars, the fact is I have lived in NYC and I have lived in the desert of West Texas as well as visiting New Mexico and Arizona and Nevada. The stars would have been amazing from the moon. NASA clearly sent a top of the line camera to get photos that they could then sell. Some of these photos were the best selling photos of all time. How is it that we don't have pictures with the stars?
You were a photographer, would you have done that?
I don't what they do and don't have...
I'm just saying that the images of the things that show the astronauts/equipment/immediate environment would have required exposure settings that took into consideration the large amount of ambient light. And that those exposures, that allowed "good" images of those subjects would have also excluded a "good" exposure of background light sources.
Also, with the necessary settings for such images, we'd expect to see a long depth-of-field and demonstrations of "stop-motion".... and lo and behold, that's what we see.
But wouldn't all that also be true if you did this on a movie studio set?
Earth Rise is the best selling picture of all time. I suspect that pictures of the stars with the Earth floating in them would also have been a big seller. I think it is obvious they were planning on bringing back photos, used excellent equipment and no doubt trained the astronauts. How is it that this did not include a picture of the stars?
Also the pictures we are questioning are not those of the astronauts but of the Earth from the moon.
