The court ruling on LGBT ENDS THIS DEBATE
- Thread starter tobewholeagain
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
No. Paul is talking from the perspective of one who is under the law of sin and death (which includes all on the earth) and the liberty of one under the law of the Spirit of Life in Christ Jesus. His summation is in the next chapter.:
For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus has made me free from the law of sin and death. 3 For what the law could not do in that it was weak through the flesh, God did by sending His own Son
My point is this: claiming that one cannot help but be homosexual is not an excuse to continue in sin. They may turn to Christ and be set free.
For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus has made me free from the law of sin and death. 3 For what the law could not do in that it was weak through the flesh, God did by sending His own Son
My point is this: claiming that one cannot help but be homosexual is not an excuse to continue in sin. They may turn to Christ and be set free.
-
So let's say a female sharing the lower half of the body with a male through defect birth, decides she no longer wants male genitals on her lower half of her body.
But the judge decides he can not allow them to be removed without the male heads consent,
Would the judge be encouraging the female to live in sin ?.
Or better still should the judge put to death the female , or God for that matter.
But the judge decides he can not allow them to be removed without the male heads consent,
Would the judge be encouraging the female to live in sin ?.
Or better still should the judge put to death the female , or God for that matter.
do you know for a fact whether the chromosomes are XY (male) or XX (female)? yes or no.
do you know for a fact that there are "male genitals" ...
I see a photo where one appears to have a longer hairstyle and the other appears to have a shorter hairstyle.
I have no idea of the genitalia ... do you???
I provided several links which indicate that conjoined twins are the result of an identical twin pregnancy ... the chromosomes will be either XY or XX in both twins.
Do you know if the photo you provided is the result of fraternal twins (two eggs fertilized by two sperm resulting in two embryos each of which form in his or her own amniotic sac)?
and please consider ... then both embryos would have had to break through his or her own amniotic sac (can an embryo even survive outside the amniotic sac???) in order to fuse with the other embryo ... or one of the embryos would have to break through his or her own sac as well as the amniotic sac of the other embryo in order to fuse together. you're asking a lot of the two embryos if you are going with the notion that they are fraternal twins ... just sayin'
.
do you know for a fact that there are "male genitals" ...
I see a photo where one appears to have a longer hairstyle and the other appears to have a shorter hairstyle.
I have no idea of the genitalia ... do you???
I provided several links which indicate that conjoined twins are the result of an identical twin pregnancy ... the chromosomes will be either XY or XX in both twins.
Do you know if the photo you provided is the result of fraternal twins (two eggs fertilized by two sperm resulting in two embryos each of which form in his or her own amniotic sac)?
and please consider ... then both embryos would have had to break through his or her own amniotic sac (can an embryo even survive outside the amniotic sac???) in order to fuse with the other embryo ... or one of the embryos would have to break through his or her own sac as well as the amniotic sac of the other embryo in order to fuse together. you're asking a lot of the two embryos if you are going with the notion that they are fraternal twins ... just sayin'
.
-
1
- Show all
well the lower part of the body will either have one or the other, what difference does it make which way round it is, one will feel inadequate either way.
The others picture shows to two people with having to whole upper bodies,
But one lower body,
There body is going to be sharing one chromosome somewhere.
Or Even both could control movent of there arms or legs,
If they decide to drive a car for instance one head would have to say let me do the steering.
Or let's say they get an itch
Both heads would feal an itch at the same time.
To say that one chromosome wouldnt be effected by the opposite sex chromosomes, would seem a guess to me.
The others picture shows to two people with having to whole upper bodies,
But one lower body,
There body is going to be sharing one chromosome somewhere.
Or Even both could control movent of there arms or legs,
If they decide to drive a car for instance one head would have to say let me do the steering.
Or let's say they get an itch
Both heads would feal an itch at the same time.
To say that one chromosome wouldnt be effected by the opposite sex chromosomes, would seem a guess to me.
somebody wanting to be transgender is not normal, could that not be down to birth defect.
To be honest I'm deeply concerned for human nature and the human mind.
I've seen a lot of documentaries on birth defects, and it's so disheartening what they go through.
It's even more disheartening when you hear a gay person who is gay as there own fault.
Or when tragedies like conjoined twins which proves birth defects are just dismissed that don't happen in the form of birth defects for Gays or transgenders.
To be honest I'm deeply concerned for human nature and the human mind.
I've seen a lot of documentaries on birth defects, and it's so disheartening what they go through.
It's even more disheartening when you hear a gay person who is gay as there own fault.
Or when tragedies like conjoined twins which proves birth defects are just dismissed that don't happen in the form of birth defects for Gays or transgenders.
This speaks of a blind person, that got cured if in not mistaken.
Where is the glory to To God for conjoined twins who can't be healed.
Besides this when science proves gay people can go gay as a result of birth defects which they will,
And then science provides a cure in the form of meds or DNA remapping.
Will people here confess there sins for lack of compassion shown
Or even reverse there statement for false accusations.
I doubt it.
So let's see a mean spirited person in this thread has complained to cc and you've decide to take his view point.
I see you gave the thumbs down straight away again.
And no doubt you'll be giving him the thumbs up soon.
Where is the glory to To God for conjoined twins who can't be healed.
Besides this when science proves gay people can go gay as a result of birth defects which they will,
And then science provides a cure in the form of meds or DNA remapping.
Will people here confess there sins for lack of compassion shown
Or even reverse there statement for false accusations.
I doubt it.
So let's see a mean spirited person in this thread has complained to cc and you've decide to take his view point.
I see you gave the thumbs down straight away again.
And no doubt you'll be giving him the thumbs up soon.
A birth defect is not the same as a man in a beard throwing on a skirt and tucking his nether regions between his legs and demanding to use womens bathrooms and showers. I do not care what people want to do with their bodies, I don't care what they want to call themselves, I don't care if they want to be in sports. Hack your body to pieces if you're that stupid, have at it. But I do not have to call you a dame, I don't have to recognize you want to be be a dame, I don't want you in the same restroom I go to and women should have to share a shower with you. Nor should a woman risk severe injury because you're a loser in men's sports and want to take over womens sports. You don't need a tampon, you don't get cramps, I'm not playing your game. If anyone else went in to a doctors office and asked for a limb to be removed, and some do, they get help for those people, because they're not right. Same goes for men who think they are women or the other way round. Two genders. Period.
-
1
- Show all
You don't believe in the Word, there's the door. None of us will miss you. God does not change. He doesn't say something is a sin and then go "Woops what was I thinkin' how homophobic of me". Get a grip. God calls it a sin. He created two genders. End of the story. Argue till you're black and blue, won't change God's mind. You want to lie to people and tell them they are safe in their sin, go on ahead. But don't you dare call that compassion!!!
-
1
- Show all
absolutely false dogma once again with no remorse for your hate speech here
I'm sure you going to gain favour from some here for hate speech towards sinners, but not of me you won't, and one day God will say I remember you when you though of your self as more highly, and said thank God I'm not like that man.
Your drenched in sin here
And not somebody I would consider a friend in Christ,
No where have I promoted living in sin.
and I won't be responding to this crap much longer from you.
I'm sure you going to gain favour from some here for hate speech towards sinners, but not of me you won't, and one day God will say I remember you when you though of your self as more highly, and said thank God I'm not like that man.
Your drenched in sin here
And not somebody I would consider a friend in Christ,
No where have I promoted living in sin.
and I won't be responding to this crap much longer from you.
Any time Christians speak out against sin, wickedness, and evil, it is called "hate speech". But when the real haters call Christians all kinds of names (including Domestic Terrorists or worse), then that is perfectly fine. So you have decide whether Christian truth is hate speech or do you prefer to side with the real haters?
-
1
-
1
-
1
- Show all
