We already proved to this guy that the atmosphere is not transparent, but he goes on pitchforking his strawman to death. Even if Christians agree with the guy, I'm disappointed they support his intellectual dishonesty.My God there are three people who disagreed with this statement. What is wrong with Christendom??????
Indeed!!!!!! Only three!?!?!? Why is it that the rest of them cannot clearly see the blatent obvious truth??????My God there are three people who disagreed with this statement. What is wrong with Christendom??????
A shame, isn't? A darn shame. Just a real, darn shame. Good that you understood my meaning so wellIndeed!!!!!! Only three!?!?!? Why is it that the rest of them cannot clearly see the blatent obvious truth??????![]()
Hey! I believe in fat earth!!!!"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it" - Aristotle
And, if the saying be true - what does it say about most Ball Earthers who are unable to even "entertain" the Flat Earth concept/model?
A shame, isn't? A darn shame. Just a real, darn shame. Good that you understood my meaning so wellMight explain a few other things... *ahem*...
Yeah, like that. I was looking for a Seinfeld clip to convey this, but that works too.
I tried that experiment. The temperature of the water in the full moon was at least one degree celcius cooler than in the shade (on some tests several degrees cooler). The moon has its own light, it does not reflect the light of the sun. As per what scripture records in Genesis (i.e. two great lights - not one great light and one great reflector).this is one of those subjects that boils down to, what do i choose to believe. both sides have their evidence.
i'm going to throw something out there. there are people that say the moons light has a cooling effect and say the shade in moonlight is warmer than the ground in moonlight. things like this make me think the moon isnt what we are told it is
I agree. But then, we have to look where the burden of proof is. It is on the one making the claim (i.e. ball-Earthers), not the one adhering to observation (i.e. those who claim the Earth is flat). If the burden of proof is not satisfied, the scientific default is that we go with observation. Anything else is not science (i.e. faith/religion). And given the scriptures imply a Flat Earth, anything else that is religion is not of the Christian religion.this is one of those subjects that boils down to, what do i choose to believe. both sides have their evidence.
i'm going to throw something out there. there are people that say the moons light has a cooling effect and say the shade in moonlight is warmer than the ground in moonlight. things like this make me think the moon isnt what we are told it is
You say that as if nobody has observed the Earth's curvature .we have to look where the burden of proof is. It is on the one making the claim (i.e. ball-
Earthers), not the one adhering to observation (i.e. those who claim the Earth is flat).
what we were taught as little kids is why we have the knee jerk reactions we do. if someone says flat earth, we have already been preprogrammed to attack them. If someone says, well, anything against the medical industry, we are preprogrammed to attack them.
And the list goes on
It is way too late to fix this problem. The only solution is for parents to empty out the public schools totally.I wish schools taught only facts instead of meddling with kids minds.