Does the Bible support the idea of a spinning ball earth flying through space, or is that a Satanic, Masonic lie?

[oyster67]

The yeast earth theory will be short-lived, no doubt. People will eat away at it until there's nothing left of it.

A little old lady will come along and poke it down with a fork.

 

[Cameron143]

A little old lady will come along and poke it down with a fork.

I'm okay with that so long as she can give the proper scientific reasoning behind her actions or PETY--People for the Ethical Treatment of Yeast---may give her a hard time.

 

[oyster67]

Good night, dear friends.

 

[Blain]

This is easier said than done.

Actually I think the posy I made further up the thread does a pretty good job of it. After I read his op the word firmament came to mind it has been at least a couple of years since I have heard that word so I decided to go with it the bible verse that I was brought to was in Genesis 1: 6-8 where the word is first spoken in scripture or in other translations dome or space enxapnsion all of them basically tying into the word firmament but it involves the arch of the heavens sphere or dome vaults of the hevaens ect.

The point being it seems to me God made it clear the earth has an arch in it's heavenly firmnent meaning it could not be flat or else there would be no arch it would not be referencing a dome or sphere

 

[Aaron56]

In all seriousness: it’s obvious the great delusion includes obsession with conspiracy. It serves to deepen the world’s distrust of the church.

 

[Snacker]

tv dinner/microwave

Crockpot 😎

 

[iamsoandso]

In all seriousness: it’s obvious the great delusion includes obsession with conspiracy. It serves to deepen the world’s distrust of the church.

Yea it seems more like the Bible is beginning us off with the basics of just living on earth first then afterwards learning about the heavens.

 

[Godsgirl1983]

Please, dear GG...
Pleeeease have mercy on our tired minds. Not another thread on Heaven-Sex for JohnBoy.

Come now Oyster.....
That can't be the only other over posted topic she didn't list before, can it?

 

[Godsgirl1983]

I made teriyaki chicken with carrots for dinner. Washed it down with raspberry iced-tea. 😋

tv dinner/microwave

hey you two!
If you're looking for the "what's for dinner?" thread, well that's down the hall.

 

[Cameron143]

hey you two!
If you're looking for the "what's for dinner?" thread, well that's down the hall.

Down the "dining " hall?

 

[NotmebutHim]

One thing just occurred to me:

If God indeed created the Earth to be flat, then how could mankind ever come up with the idea to make spherical objects? God could not endow man with any characteristics or attributes that He Himself doesn't already possess.

 

[oyster67]

hey you two!
If you're looking for the "what's for dinner?" thread, well that's down the hall.

You tell 'em, GG! Smack that @Snacker with that big whacker you got slung over yer shoulder!

 

[Cameron143]

You tell 'em, GG! Smack that @Snacker with that big whacker you got slung over yer shoulder!

Wow! A Snacker whacker smacker. That's crackers.

 

[oyster67]

Wow! A Snacker whacker smacker. That's crackers.

It's gonna be a Cam cracker if yer not careful!

 

[Cameron143]

It's gonna be a Cam cracker if yer not careful!

Is that a good substitute for Graham crackers when making smores?

 

[NotmebutHim]

Any recipe is good as long as it fits on this giant "dinner plate" we call Earth...............

 

[oyster67]

Is that a good substitute for Graham crackers when making smores?

Suuuuuure... Jus keep making wise crackers.... Yul' see.

 

[Cameron143]

Suuuuuure... Jus keep making wise crackers.... Yul' see.

My sincerest apologies. I didn't realize you preferred dumb cracks. I do try to practice being all things to all people.

 

[Moses_Young]

Yes the bible says to be a true witness for his kingdom.

It's quite clear when you look up at the sky you see the sun the stars the moon all on the move, following the same rotational orbit of our planet every day.

The "Airy's failure" experiment proved it's the stars that move, not the Earth.

But the most compelling evidence is.
There is no way the stars that are light years away could do a full orbit of earth in just 24 hours.

The vast distance to the stars is a necessary assumption for the Heliocentric theory. It's not necessary for Flat Earth or the Geocentric theory, which both allow the stars to be much closer. This does away with all the conjecture about how starlight could travel so many millions of light years in one day, on day 4 of Genesis. Which belief fits the biblical account better?

Which only means one thing our planet is spinning around.

The Michelson-Morley experiment demonstrated the Earth isn't moving, which also fits our experience. We never feel the Earth move.

Then there is the constant flow of rivers and underground water always on the move and never motionless.

Then there is both sides of a sea or ocean ( one side falls whilst the other side rises each day. (Never motionless).

Two examples of the false cause logical fallacy. Movement of water does not require movement of Earth.

Then there's earth viewed from space. 😊.

If NASA really went to the moon, do you believe that it would have lost the technology? NASA has been lying for decades, and therefore all of its "evidence" is not going to convince anyone who is not easily swayed by lies or propaganda.

 

[Cameron143]

The "Airy's failure" experiment proved it's the stars that move, not the Earth.

The vast distance to the stars is a necessary assumption for the Heliocentric theory. It's not necessary for Flat Earth or the Geocentric theory, which both allow the stars to be much closer. This does away with all the conjecture about how starlight could travel so many millions of light years in one day, on day 4 of Genesis. Which belief fits the biblical account better?

The Michelson-Morley experiment demonstrated the Earth isn't moving, which also fits our experience. We never feel the Earth move.

Two examples of the false cause logical fallacy. Movement of water does not require movement of Earth.

If NASA really went to the moon, do you believe that it would have lost the technology? NASA has been lying for decades, and therefore all of its "evidence" is not going to convince anyone who is not easily swayed by lies or propaganda.

All that is fine, but how do you explain the data collected by the cow that jumped over the moon?