5 Points of Arminianism
- Thread starter NOV25
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Jesus said God made male and female to become ONE FLESH. 2 men nor women can become one FLESH [create a baby].
But, Calvin claims God also makes men do homosexual things even though Jesus said God made Male to be with women.
Clearly, Calvin is a liar!
But look at TULIP!
That Clearly is the belief that God made John do queer things and the entire TULIP definition shows us from Calvin's view God made him do same sex things.
So theoretically speaking here, but to follow TULIP is to think God makes you Sin and do VILE THINGS.
What Followers of Jesus would ever think Jesus made them sin?
This is why TULIP is not Biblical in any fashion form or sense.
But, Calvin claims God also makes men do homosexual things even though Jesus said God made Male to be with women.
Clearly, Calvin is a liar!
But look at TULIP!
That Clearly is the belief that God made John do queer things and the entire TULIP definition shows us from Calvin's view God made him do same sex things.
So theoretically speaking here, but to follow TULIP is to think God makes you Sin and do VILE THINGS.
What Followers of Jesus would ever think Jesus made them sin?
This is why TULIP is not Biblical in any fashion form or sense.
Again. How does a dead person choose Jesus?
[QUOTE="VARob, post: 5040077, member: 304022"
]Agreed.[/QUOTE]
No one is Spiritually alive UNTIL they are born again from above.
So if you agree with that, how can a Spiritually dead person "decide" ANYTHING Spiritual?
God gave mankind the freedom to choose how they want to live their lives on earth, and all mankind choose not to seek God, so, by his mercy, and sovereign grace, he choose most of mankind to adopt as his children.
Hardly broken. Maybe a little scratched.You're a broken record, Forest.
Wrong interpretation of Romans 1, they are disobedient children of God.
There are too many scriptures that will not harmonise with the notion that they are natural beings that have not yet been born again spiritually.
Calvin just said neither man nor Satan has free will, we are just robots doing what God chooses us to do.
How can you follow anything from Calvin that claims God made you kill someone?
Calvin is claiming God made him be sexual with another man.
Clearly, if I follow Calvin then I am sinless because God is making me sin!!
Attachments
So ultimately we have Jesus and the Bible
Or
CALVIN and his interpretation of the Doctrine he created while in prison for Sodomy.
Essentially speaking here, some people's god and doctrine literally comes from a Closet Queen!!
Or
CALVIN and his interpretation of the Doctrine he created while in prison for Sodomy.
Essentially speaking here, some people's god and doctrine literally comes from a Closet Queen!!
Considering this thread is about the Praise and Worship of Calvin, only his viewpoint actually matters here.
I am just wiping the tears away from laughing at some moron who made Calvin their example of godliness while Calvin is literally destroying God's Image by claiming God made him do such vile things.
Recently a correspondent wrote to ask about the following: “An interesting story: in 1527, the year he was 18, Calvin was arrested, tried, and convicted of homosexual activity. Instead of being executed (per French law at the time), he was branded with a fleur-de-lis on one of his shoulders.”
This question is interesting for two reasons: the historical question (is the claim true?) and because it illustrates one of the problems of doing history on the internet.
The problem of doing history on the internet is illustrated by two sites. In the first instance it is claimed that Calvin was arrested for and convicted of Sodomy in 1527. In the second in second it is claimed that he was arrested for and convicted of sodomy in 1534.
The first author claims:
In 1551, a Catholic controversialist revealed that the archives of the city of Noyon, Calvin’s birth place, contain the record of a condemnation against Calvin, at age 18, for sodomy. He had by then already received the tonsure. His parents obtained clemency from the bishop, so that instead of being condemned to death as the law demanded, he was branded as a sign of infamy. The Catholic controversialist presented the evidence signed by all the eminent personages of the city. The English scholar Stapleton went there to examine the archives during Calvin’s lifetime, and vouched for the fact. The contemporary German Lutherans spoke of it as an established fact (Schlusselburg, Theologie calvinienne).
For the uninitiated this might seem like a plausible claim. It seems learned. The author cites a 1551 source, the author of which is identified as a “controversialist,” and an apparently modern French secondary work. A search of WorldCat (one of the world’s largest databases of library holdings across the globe) reveals no such title. This is not to say that the work does not exist but it does indicate that a volume with an author with this surname with those words does not appear to be catalogued in the civilized world. UPDATE: It appears that the citation is incorrect. The title is Theologia calvinistarum…. and it is available on Google Books. Thanks to HB reader Phil D. for his help.
Second, and more significantly, the author relies upon a most jaundiced and historically discredited sixteenth-century source, Jerome Bolsec (d. 1584). Bolsec was a former Carmelite monk turned physician, who had vacillated between the Reformation and Rome. He attacked Calvin’s doctrine of predestination during a meeting of the congregation. Bolsec, “a poor theologian technically” and “particularly weak on the history doctrines” (T. H. L. Parker) charged Calvin with making God the author of sin. Absent for the first part of Bolsec’s complaint, Calvin arrived unseen and stood to reply ex tempore for one hour. He replied to Bolsec in print in 1552 with De aeterna dei praedestinatione. Thus, Bolsec is hardly an unbiased witness. His account of Calvin’s life (see below) is notorious for its falsehoods.
Third, and most importantly, our author has his facts wrong. At age 18, Calvin, known for his austerity and devotion to Roman piety, was matriculated in the College de Montaigu (according to Ganoczy, 63–67. See below for bibliographic data), which was known for its strict discipline. Had there been anything like this it would have been noted then and he would have not been able to go on to Orleans and Bourges. Most definitively against this claim, however, is the fact that Calvin was not in Noyon and the registers do not record any such event in 1527.
Second, if anything did happen 1534 is a more likely date. In fact a certain “Iean Cauvin” (the original spelling of Calvin’s surname) was in Noyon in this period. According to the Alister E. McGrath, A Life of John Calvin: A Study in the Shaping of Western Culture(Oxford: Blackwell, 1990), 73–74,
The Noyon archives for 26 May [1534] record that one ‘Iean Cauvin’ was imprisoned for causing a disturbance in church on Trinity Sunday.
He cites Abel LeFranc, La Jeunesse de Calvin (Paris, 1888), 201.
1534. 26 mai. — Me Jean Cauvin est mis in prison, à la porte Corbaut, pour tumulte fait dans l’èglise la veille de la Sainte-Trinitè, fol. 20, vo, èlargi le 3 juin, fol. 21, ro, reis en prison le 5, fol. 22, ro, (Inventaire de Sèzille, à la date).
This person, released on 3 June, was returned to prison two days later. Some Roman apologists have assumed that this “Iean Cauvin” must be the Reformer. McGrath explains:
…the Noyon edicts scrupulously record that the ‘Cauvin’ who was imprisoned possessed an alias—Mudit. [McGrath cites Emile Domergue, Jean Calvin, les hommes et les chases de son temps, 7 vols. (Lausanne, 1899–1927), 7.575] In other words, the Jean Cauvin dict Mudit was carefully distinguished fro the individual of the same name who had featured in the chronicles of that city only a few weeks earlier.
T. H.L. Parker noted this confusion in 1975, citing Emile Domergue’s 1927 correction and explanation of the city records regarding “Un Iean Cauvin, dict Mudit” [John Calvin: A Biography(Philadelphia: The Westminster Press, 1975), 31.]. Ganosczy (p. 85) observes that there is ambiguity and doubt regarding the names and imprisonment.
Still, there is nothing here to suggest that Calvin was charged with sodomy in 1534 and branded with the fleur-de-lys so whence the claim of the second writer? Irena Backus, Life Writing in Reformation Europe: Lives of Reformers by Friends, Disciples, and Foes(Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008), 159, explains:
As has been shown by other sixteenth- and particularly seventeenth-century Catholic biographies of the Reformer, Bolsec’s account of Calvin’s youth conflates at least two people from Noyon called Jean Cauvin. [fn 116 says, “Cf. also Théophile Dufour, ‘Calviniana’ in [no editor], Mélanges offerts à M. Émile Picot, member de l’Institut, par ses amis et élèves (Paris: Librarie Damascène Morgand, 1913), pp. 1–16, esp. pp. 13–16] To this conflation, he adds a certain amount of rumour and fiction, intending to give his reader a full portrait of Calvin’s iniquitous youth, the hallmark of any heretic.
She continues,
Bolsec further claims that Calvin himself was convicted of sodomy as a young cleric in Noyon, a crime for which he would have been burned at the stake had the sentence not been commuted at the last moment to branding with a fleur-de-lys on the shoulder. Under the weight of this opprobrium, Calvin, according to our biographer, sold his benefices and left for Germany and Ferrara. In fact, as is well documented by the same Le Vasseur [Jacques Le Vasseur, Annales de l’Eglise de Noyon jadis dite de Vermand, ou le troisiesme liure des Antiquitez, Chroniques ou plustost Histoire de la Cathedrale de Noyon. Par M. Iacques le Vasseur, docteur en theologie de la Facult´ de Paris, doyen et chanoine deladite Eglise, 2 vols. (Paris: Sara, 1633), 2.90], a certain Jean Cauvin, Roman Catholic vicar of Noyon, was deprived of his livings for refusing to abandon his dissolute lifestyle. The description might have well suited young Calvin were it not for the date, Janusary 1553; Calvin had been well and truly settled in Geneva since 1541 (ibid, 160).
Backus further explains that, according to Le Vasseur, “no records of branding exist in connection with any of the Noyon clergy of the 1530s. Indeed, this claim about the Reformer had already been exposed as false in 1583 by Jean-Papire Masson (ibid, 160).
In short, the Calvin imprisoned in Noyon, in 1534, was not the Protestant Reformer. The Calvin branded as a punishment for refusing to repent of sodomy was a Roman priest and not the Protestant Reformer and further this has been known since the 16th century. That old, centuries discredited myths are apparently gaining new life illustrates one of the dangers of learning via the internet.
https://heidelblog.net/2012/11/was-calvin-a-homosexual-convict/
God gifted us the faith to believe.
That faith is ACTIVATED by the hearing of the Word.
16But they have not all obeyed the gospel. For Esaias saith, Lord, who hath believed our report? 17So then faith [cometh] by hearing, and hearing by the word of God.
"Comes by" in the Greek means;
1537. ek or ex
Definition: from, from out of
Usage: from out, out from among, from, suggesting from the interior outwards.
This is something that is WITHIN us, given to us by God.
It's OK man, we know why you secretly desire Calvin.
Do you claim God made you do it as well, like Calvin did?
Fair enough. But hopefully those tears of laughter will turn to tears of sorrow for those you feel are in error.
Amen!
But seeing their post history and actions, it will literally require a miracle from God to change them.
As I have told you before, in case you have forgotten, or just did not pay attention, I have never read any of Calvin's writings, and if these are his teachings, I disagree with him.
I only use the scriptures, and Strong's concordance, believing that the scriptures prove themselves, by harmonizing with one another.
I did not read your attachment. I do not take other person's thoughts on the scriptures of any value.