Earthquakes in Turkey and Syria Kill 11,000+
- Thread starter Genipher
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Where is the compassion,the love that Jesus had when he said "these things must come to pass"......
Yes, bc of these troubles the world must face does not mean we turn a blind eye nor a hard heart. I do not think this has been done at the expense of the destruction & lives lost.
I see compassion & concern in this thread not a yippee our time is almost over!
Yes, bc of these troubles the world must face does not mean we turn a blind eye nor a hard heart. I do not think this has been done at the expense of the destruction & lives lost.
I see compassion & concern in this thread not a yippee our time is almost over!
-
1
- Show all
The lost are dying all the day long @ZNP .
God has NO pleasure in the death of the unsaved, so should we?
Your compassion or lack thereof speaks VERY LOUDLY of your heart!
Is it our place to judge hearts or say what is in just recompense in todays
world ?
Does NOT THE RAIN FALL ON THE JUST & THE UNJUST ALIKE?
God has NO pleasure in the death of the unsaved, so should we?
Your compassion or lack thereof speaks VERY LOUDLY of your heart!
Is it our place to judge hearts or say what is in just recompense in todays
world ?
Does NOT THE RAIN FALL ON THE JUST & THE UNJUST ALIKE?
EARTHQUAKE FREQUENCY OVER TIME
If we chart known earthquakes from 1900 to the present day, it appears that dramatically more earthquakes are happening. However, this is misleading: for the first half of the 1900s, we were not recording small or moderate earthquakes, nor did we have enough seismic monitoring stations to record earthquakes worldwide.
The number of monitoring stations has proliferated over the past 60 years, leading to significantly more records of seismic activity. For example, the Southern California Seismic Network grew from 20 seismic monitoring stations in 1960 to nearly 400 in 2010. The International Seismological Centre shows all the current international registry of stations:
If we chart known earthquakes from 1900 to the present day, it appears that dramatically more earthquakes are happening. However, this is misleading: for the first half of the 1900s, we were not recording small or moderate earthquakes, nor did we have enough seismic monitoring stations to record earthquakes worldwide.
The number of monitoring stations has proliferated over the past 60 years, leading to significantly more records of seismic activity. For example, the Southern California Seismic Network grew from 20 seismic monitoring stations in 1960 to nearly 400 in 2010. The International Seismological Centre shows all the current international registry of stations:
This is why I just go back to 1950. One Seismometer will record any earthquake in about 65% of the Earth. So if you put them throughout the US from Maine and Alaska in the North to Hawaii, Guam, Florida and Puerto Rico in the South would be able to register earthquakes pretty much anywhere in the world. However, after the discovery of nuclear weapons all the nuclear powers carefully monitored seismometers to detect earthquakes. Russia, China, UK, France and the US all were carefully monitoring for any seismic activity since 1950.
Also, major universities around the world and research centers and US military bases (which are on all 7 continents) have these seismometers.
Also, major universities around the world and research centers and US military bases (which are on all 7 continents) have these seismometers.
I decided to redo this to eliminate the confusion this post may have made. Whether you have 1 or 400 seismic seismometers in Southern California it won't make much difference in detecting earthquakes around the world. The way we, and Russia, and China, and Uk, and France, and the UN, and Israel, India, Pakistan all monitor nuclear tests is with seismometers. Having 400 in Southern California will not detect more earthquakes than having 1 seismometer would.
However, our ability to detect minor tremors has very likely improved. So instead of making 2.5 the cutoff I made 4.5 the cutoff. A 4.5 is an earthquake that everyone would feel, it is 100x more powerful than a 2.5 and these are the earthquakes that for the most part would be recorded in the newspaper as well (though to be fair quite a few earthquakes take place in the ocean). Still there is no doubt at all that our ability to detect these in 1950 was just as good as it is today.
Here are the results
(These are earthquakes that everyone would have felt and would have been reported in the news.)
Earthquakes of magnitude 4.5+
1950-1963 3973
1960-1973 6603
1970-1983 36,020
1980-1993 52,772
1990-2003 58,092
2000-2013 85,631
2010-2023 128,656
Interestingly the increase is 30 fold pretty much the same as if we did 2.5+
However, our ability to detect minor tremors has very likely improved. So instead of making 2.5 the cutoff I made 4.5 the cutoff. A 4.5 is an earthquake that everyone would feel, it is 100x more powerful than a 2.5 and these are the earthquakes that for the most part would be recorded in the newspaper as well (though to be fair quite a few earthquakes take place in the ocean). Still there is no doubt at all that our ability to detect these in 1950 was just as good as it is today.
Here are the results
(These are earthquakes that everyone would have felt and would have been reported in the news.)
Earthquakes of magnitude 4.5+
1950-1963 3973
1960-1973 6603
1970-1983 36,020
1980-1993 52,772
1990-2003 58,092
2000-2013 85,631
2010-2023 128,656
Interestingly the increase is 30 fold pretty much the same as if we did 2.5+
Significant earthquakes are definitely not a valid measure of whether or not the Earth is having more earthquakes. They take into account how many people felt it. 70% of the Earth's surface is the ocean. As population increases you expect to get more earthquakes that people feel.
Instead a seismometer will detect every earthquake. You use 3 to triangulate the position and you need to know that to determine the strength. So then 3 seismometers on every continent would be sufficient to determine the total number and strength of every earthquake that takes place. As you have already pointed out in Southern California alone we had 20.
Instead a seismometer will detect every earthquake. You use 3 to triangulate the position and you need to know that to determine the strength. So then 3 seismometers on every continent would be sufficient to determine the total number and strength of every earthquake that takes place. As you have already pointed out in Southern California alone we had 20.
For crying out loud! This Turkish Leader makes an extremely strong case that this was in fact a geological weapon that was used against her land.
Earthquake Speech
Is this Haarp?
Earthquake Speech
Is this Haarp?
Drone Footage of Earthquake Devastation
(Not censored/ No sign in necessary)
(Not censored/ No sign in necessary)