E
evyaniy
Guest
have you checked the Hebrew word instances that are translated to precepts, statutes and testimonies? thank you for correcting though.That is incorrect. All those terms apply to the laws of God.
have you checked the Hebrew word instances that are translated to precepts, statutes and testimonies? thank you for correcting though.That is incorrect. All those terms apply to the laws of God.
If you try and keep the law and fail at any point and offend the law are you respecting CHRIST's teachings?I think Christians who worship Christ respect his teachings.
I respect Christ's teachings so to know what law I'm referring to.If you try and keep the law and fail at any point and offend the law are you respecting CHRIST's teachings?
Precept = command, ordinance, oraclehave you checked the Hebrew word instances that are translated to precepts, statutes and testimonies? thank you for correcting though.
Why don't you just choose to make your point rather than doing what your doing to others ?![]()
See what knowing Psalm 119 is the Son's prayer for life teaches us.
That would be a very serious error. The Bible makes it crystal clear that Christ was absolutely without sin. And here is the reason why the Law needed to be set aside: If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the Law,) what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron? For the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the Law. (Heb 7:11,12)...you're telling me that Jesus Christ the spotless, sinless Lamb of God "went astray" before He was afflicted.
I could be wrong but isn't the idea Jesus was a man anointed with God's power to bring the Gospel a teaching of the Jehovah Witnesses? Anabaptists too I think.Before I was afflicted I went astray,But now I keep Your word. (Psalm 119:67)you're telling me that Jesus Christ the spotless, sinless Lamb of God "went astray" before He was afflicted.
i.e. the Good Shepherd once was lost but now He is found.
i do not see how that is not blasphemy in direct contradiction with such things as 1 John 3:5 "in Him there is no sin"
please explain.
I understand that the 10 Commandments are the standard that YHVH, GOD, gave not only to His people Israel, but to the whole world and are timeless, being in the ark of the covenant where the mercy seat of GOD is. This I believe, is why the Ark of His Testament is referenced in Rev. 11:18-19, because those Tables placed within, written by the very finger of GOD are still binding upon all men.
This is why, as I understand it, that Jesus came, to introduce a new and living way, that is by Him through His Spirit.
Acts 17:29-31 refers to disobedience to the 2nd Command and says that GOD commands all men everywhere to Repent. This is a direct reference to repenting of a command of GOD right there at the beginning of the New Testament.
Paul goes on to teach clarity on our New Testament relationship with the Law as a school master, teaching us the standard and pointing out our failure. To which we are called to 1.) Repent and 2.) Believe the gospel. that your sins (transgression of the Law 1Jn. 3:3-6) may be blotted out.
Throughout history we have seen the 10 Commandments hanging in homes, schools, places of business, and government buildings. Never before have we seen such a rejection of GOD's Moral Law for all of mankind rejected worldwide. Now the end is here! Because what else can be done when man has rejected GOD's holy standard.
The 2 witnesses will soon come speaking the same thing in the days of their prophesy and the world will despise them for it (Rev. 11:3-13).
Much like many Christians do today when this is brought up...
Psalm 119:67 is poorly translated. Hebrew word sagag H7683 is only used 5 times in Scripture. It is translated 5 different words each time. it basically means to be unaware or ignorant of something. "went astray" is completely a wrong translation.
verse 66 says
66 Teach Me good judgment and knowledge: for I have believed Thy commandments.
The Son is asking to be taught because He believes in His Father's commandments and the promise of life to Him for His obedience in giving His life to save us.
67 Before I was afflicted I was unaware: but now have I kept Thy word.
The Son learned through what He suffered. He was unaware before He was afflicted. As a Man He experience cruelty and violence which He had not experienced before He was afflicted. He was learning and being taught.
68 Thou art good, and doest good; teach Me Thy statutes.
The Son again praises His Father for being good and again asks Him to teach Him through what He is experiencing.
69 The proud have forged a lie against Me: but I will keep Thy precepts with My whole heart.
The Son describes being accused with false charges. He again declares His obedience and even says He will keep the Father's precepts with His Whole Heart.
70 their heart is as fat as grease; but I delight in Thy law.
the Son again says He delights in His Father's law because it was Life to Him because of His obedience.
71 It is good for Me that I have been afflicted; that I might learn Thy statutes.
The Son says that He learned His Father's Statutes through what He suffered which is exactly what Hebrews 5 tells us. He also received the promise of life in the law to Him for His obedience in giving His life to save us.
if you want to hang your hat on 1 mistranslated word "sagag" that only occurs 5 times in Scripture and is translated 5 different ways then have at it. if you want to ignore the immense amount of evidence through Psalm 119 that proves it is the Son's prayer to live because of His obedience to the law in giving His life to save us, then by all means ignore the body of evidence and hold on to your "sagag" for all it's worth.
I've heard other sincere believers say that since Jesus kept the Laws of Moses we should keep them or at least try and somehow that is following Him. Is this what Jesus was talking about in these passages?
Mathew 5:17-20 Jesus said, Do not think that I came to destroy the law and the prophets. No , I have not come to destroy them , but to fulfil them... whoever breaks the least of these commandment , and teaches men so, he will be called the least in the kingdom....
Mathew 5 verse 20 For I(JESUS) say to you, unless your rightousness exceeds the rightousness of the scribes and the pharisees, you cannot enter the kingdom of heaven.
In verse 17, Jesus said we're teach and do the law of Moses to be great in the kingdom and in verse 20 Jesus said unless your rightousness exceeds the rightousness of the Law you'll in no case enter the kingdom of heaven.
Are we to do both, keep the Law of Moses like Jesus, and keep Jesus words in red . Would that be exceeding the scribes and pharisees rightousness?
Exodus 34:28 - So he was there with the Lord forty days and forty nights; he neither ate bread nor drank water. And He wrote on the tablets the words of the covenant, the Ten Commandments.Do you believe the 10 commandments began with Moses?
Every single one of the 10 Commandments stands. Yes, it is necessary to follow the commandments.
Do you observe the Sabbath commandment as Moses ordained?
You shall keep the Sabbath, therefore, for it is holy to you. Everyone who profanes it shall surely be put to death; for whoever does any work on it, that person shall be cut off from among his people. Work shall be done for six days, but the seventh is the Sabbath of rest, holy to the LORD. Whoever does any work on the Sabbath day, he shall surely be put to death.
Exodus 31:14-15
thank you for explaining that. does that mean you acknowledge that Psalm 119 is the Son's prayer to live and be raised from the dead because of His obedience to the law in giving His life to save us?Do you understand that Jesus Christ is the Lord God; the Lord God of the Old Testament who spoke through the mouth of the prophets?
a little late to the game, but hebrews 5:7 immediately popped in my mind when I read this. I'm no Psalms expert, but maybe not all of 119 is from Christs perspective (if any of it is), the BSB breaks it up into sections... idk if this is useful to you but I felt the need to post it.my point is i find the idea that the Son of God has need of salvation from death to be ludicrous, and i am still waiting for an explanation for that belief.
a little late to the game, but hebrews 5:7 immediately popped in my mind when I read this. I'm no Psalms expert, but maybe not all of 119 is from Christs perspective (if any of it is), the BSB breaks it up into sections... idk if this is useful to you but I felt the need to post it.