You are engaging in special pleading, a logical fallacy, you are saying marriage is for fertility but you refuse to apply that rule to the infertile showing your position isn't about having children at all.
false. Same sex marriage accounts for about 5% of all marriages but same ex divorce accounts for about 1.6% of all divorces. Ref UCLA school of law
a claim without foundation is...basically useless.
Again special pleading
(You are engaging in special pleading, a logical fallacy, you are saying marriage is for fertility but you refuse to apply that rule to the infertile showing your position isn't about having children at all.)
My argument has been multiple variables not a single issue that isn't how this works. I never said it was just for fertility. You have to factor everything else in as well. When you do then it is obvious. You have had quite a bit of evidence thrown your way but refuse to see it. Question is what are you defending? Sin? Personal sin?
(false. Same sex marriage accounts for about 5% of all marriages but same ex divorce accounts for about 1.6% of all divorces. Ref UCLA school of law)
- The average length of a first marriage that ends up in a divorce for men is 7.8 years. (Wilkinson & Finkbeiner, 2020)
- For women, the average first marriage length that ends up in a divorce is 7.9 years. (Wilkinson & Finkbeiner, 2020)
- Female couples made up 72% of same-sex divorces in 2019. (Marr, 2020)
- the median duration of marriages for female couples is 4.1 years, and 4.3 years for male couples. (Ghosh, 2020)
In comparison to the median duration:
Heterosexual- 7.8 and 7.9
Homosexual- 4.1 and 4.3
Obviously, there are more heterosexual marriages.
(a claim without foundation is...basically useless.)
Members of the LGBT community are at increased risk for a number of health threats when compared to their heterosexual peers [1-5].
https://www.cdc.gov/lgbthealth/index.htm
Amazing that a biased government source would even admit this.
(Again special pleading)
Nope. Not every situation is the same. Try again.