Is The Whole Holy Bible

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Is The Whole Holy Bible Non-denominational?


  • Total voters
    9

RaceRunner

Well-known member
Oct 13, 2022
1,576
289
83
#1
Non-denominational?

Deuteronomy 4:2
You shall not add to the word that I speak to you, neither shall you take away from it: keep the commandments of the Lord your God which I command you.
 

soberxp

Senior Member
May 3, 2018
2,511
482
83
#3
Titus 3:10
Party members from different sects,Once you have warned him once or twice, you must reject him.

1 Corinthians 12:25
 

soberxp

Senior Member
May 3, 2018
2,511
482
83
#4
I think we should have no sects idea in our hearts and mind. We can't really reject anyone just because there are sects.if so, It seems that we still can't unite together.
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
19,028
6,534
113
62
#5
Non-denominational?

Deuteronomy 4:2
The Bible itself doesn't speak of denominations. Jesus saw the church as His body. Imagine having one part of your body over here another there. It must be somewhat disappointing for Jesus to see His bride in this estate. On the positive side, having a church on every corner would be helpful if revival does come.
 

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
25,404
13,747
113
#6
I agree... Christians should not be involved in sects... outside of marriage.

...

Wait...

;)
 
Mar 4, 2020
8,614
3,691
113
#8
Is The Whole Holy Bible Non-denominational?
Sometimes denominations don't think they're a denomination. I visited a church one time that was utterly convinced they had it all right, of course they were wrong about many things. They called themselves a non-denominational, but they are a well-known denomination. I guess most church congregations and individuals have no intention of being knowingly in error about something.
 

RaceRunner

Well-known member
Oct 13, 2022
1,576
289
83
#9
Sometimes denominations don't think they're a denomination. I visited a church one time that was utterly convinced they had it all right, of course they were wrong about many things. They called themselves a non-denominational, but they are a well-known denomination. I guess most church congregations and individuals have no intention of being knowingly in error about something.
Which one do you believe the Holy Bible is, denominational or non-denominational?
 
Mar 4, 2020
8,614
3,691
113
#10
Which one do you believe the Holy Bible is, denominational or non-denominational?
I think the authors of the Bible intended there to be no denominations or factions, but they addressed the reality of disunity in the faith and knowledge. So my answer is the Bible is non-denominational, people are denominational.

Ephesians 4:11-16
11So Christ himself gave the apostles, the prophets, the evangelists, the pastors and teachers, 12to equip his people for works of service, so that the body of Christ may be built up 13until we all reach unity in the faith and in the knowledge of the Son of God and become mature, attaining to the whole measure of the fullness of Christ.
14Then we will no longer be infants, tossed back and forth by the waves, and blown here and there by every wind of teaching and by the cunning and craftiness of people in their deceitful scheming. 15Instead, speaking the truth in love, we will grow to become in every respect the mature body of him who is the head, that is, Christ. 16From him the whole body, joined and held together by every supporting ligament, grows and builds itself up in love, as each part does its work.
 

RaceRunner

Well-known member
Oct 13, 2022
1,576
289
83
#11
I think the authors of the Bible intended there to be no denominations or factions, but they addressed the reality of disunity in the faith and knowledge. So my answer is the Bible is non-denominational, people are denominational.

Ephesians 4:11-16
11So Christ himself gave the apostles, the prophets, the evangelists, the pastors and teachers, 12to equip his people for works of service, so that the body of Christ may be built up 13until we all reach unity in the faith and in the knowledge of the Son of God and become mature, attaining to the whole measure of the fullness of Christ.
14Then we will no longer be infants, tossed back and forth by the waves, and blown here and there by every wind of teaching and by the cunning and craftiness of people in their deceitful scheming. 15Instead, speaking the truth in love, we will grow to become in every respect the mature body of him who is the head, that is, Christ. 16From him the whole body, joined and held together by every supporting ligament, grows and builds itself up in love, as each part does its work.
I think you should vote to get more people on our side. ;)
 

oyster67

Senior Member
May 24, 2014
11,887
8,705
113
#13
Which one do you believe the Holy Bible is, denominational or non-denominational?
The Bible came first. Denominations are based on the Bible. I suppose one could ask if denominations were present before the New Testament. The Pharisees and Sadducees were known for having pre-NT sects.... :unsure:
 

Snacks

Well-known member
Feb 10, 2022
1,410
771
113
#17
There’s a gotcha moment coming. Me thinks this thread is designed to defend the RCC. 🍿
 

RaceRunner

Well-known member
Oct 13, 2022
1,576
289
83
#18
There’s a gotcha moment coming. Me thinks this thread is designed to defend the RCC. 🍿
This tread doesn't defend the RCC; this thread is denominational and non-denominational.
 

JohnDB

Well-known member
Jan 16, 2021
6,188
2,505
113
#19
Every Bible is translated from the original languages into various languages that everyone can read or hear in their own language.

As such the various denominations have a plethora of synonyms at their disposal. Each current English translation reflects a particular denomination because the English language is the worst receptor language in existence. We English speakers don't think in the same way that the original languages were spoken or written in.
The translations are accurate but are translated in such a way to highlight certain aspects and demote others.
Even Ye Olde King James translation is a reflection of the Church of England as started by the infamous King Henry VIII.

The most "non-denominational" Bible in America was the NIV...but today it has been attacked by EVERY denomination and subtle changes in the translation process has been made so that its not as offensive to the various denominations as it once was.
The ESV is the Calvinist Bible...like the Geneva Bible once was.
The ISR 98 is the Messianic Jewish Bible (Jews that believe in Jesus) that has a very different translation style than any American or UK translation can provide...I like it for the breath of fresh air.
The HCSB is the Baptist translation...and it is a good translation for those who take the time to understand what all the brackets and various notations mean.
The NASB...it claims to be a more word-for-word translation...but this is not true either because it can't be. There aren't equivalent words or grammar rules in the languages.
Scriptures are written in metaphoric language and euphemisms that have no English equivalent. Ancient Hebrew has no bad words like "homosexual" or "Thief". So euphemisms were employed to create the terms.

Even 500 years ago they came across this challenge...a "tekon" in Greek/Latin was a general construction laborer. Not a skilled trade. In the ancient Near East that meant usually a man worked in stone construction...but in the forests of Europe a stone Mason was a high skill trade. So they chose the word "carpenter" to denote "general construction worker". To this day people still think Jesus was a carpenter. But this is the problem with euphemisms and not having equivalent language.
 

RaceRunner

Well-known member
Oct 13, 2022
1,576
289
83
#20
Every Bible is translated from the original languages into various languages that everyone can read or hear in their own language.

As such the various denominations have a plethora of synonyms at their disposal. Each current English translation reflects a particular denomination because the English language is the worst receptor language in existence. We English speakers don't think in the same way that the original languages were spoken or written in.
The translations are accurate but are translated in such a way to highlight certain aspects and demote others.
Even Ye Olde King James translation is a reflection of the Church of England as started by the infamous King Henry VIII.

The most "non-denominational" Bible in America was the NIV...but today it has been attacked by EVERY denomination and subtle changes in the translation process has been made so that its not as offensive to the various denominations as it once was.
The ESV is the Calvinist Bible...like the Geneva Bible once was.
The ISR 98 is the Messianic Jewish Bible (Jews that believe in Jesus) that has a very different translation style than any American or UK translation can provide...I like it for the breath of fresh air.
The HCSB is the Baptist translation...and it is a good translation for those who take the time to understand what all the brackets and various notations mean.
The NASB...it claims to be a more word-for-word translation...but this is not true either because it can't be. There aren't equivalent words or grammar rules in the languages.
Scriptures are written in metaphoric language and euphemisms that have no English equivalent. Ancient Hebrew has no bad words like "homosexual" or "Thief". So euphemisms were employed to create the terms.

Even 500 years ago they came across this challenge...a "tekon" in Greek/Latin was a general construction laborer. Not a skilled trade. In the ancient Near East that meant usually a man worked in stone construction...but in the forests of Europe a stone Mason was a high skill trade. So they chose the word "carpenter" to denote "general construction worker". To this day people still think Jesus was a carpenter. But this is the problem with do you believe the Holy Bible is non-denominational? euphemisms and not having equivalent language.
What is your answer; do you believe the Holy Bible is non-denominational?