Next Big Debate, Obergefell v. Hodges, Gay Marriage

[iamsoandso]

I incorporated a rainbow in quite a few of my Scripture panels Yes, for the reason you state:

It being the symbol of God's covenant with humanity

Yes because that's what it means. The major religions should press the point and have them stop trying to change it's meaning and symbolism.

 

[JohnDB]

I dont know when marriage became the estate of the state. It was always the estate of God, delegated to the family. The state usurping God has caused these problems, from the dissolution of the family to sodomites seeking justification in the state.

Because your definition of "Church" is not the same as the framers of the constitution.
That famous letter of Thomas Jefferson made it clear that the Church of Virginia vs the Church of Pennsylvania was not something that the Federal Government could involve itself in as there was a wall of separation between the State (Federal Government) and these churches.

 

[iamsoandso]

I should have added these links to show the importance in arguing that they cease from using the rainbow as their symbol https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/692/1250/379155/ and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermos_LLC

 

[Dirtman]

Because your definition of "Church" is not the same as the framers of the constitution.
That famous letter of Thomas Jefferson made it clear that the Church of Virginia vs the Church of Pennsylvania was not something that the Federal Government could involve itself in as there was a wall of separation between the State (Federal Government) and these churches.

I guess I am missing your point. I never said church. I said marriage is the estate of God, and he delegated it to the family.
As far as church and state goes. I'm very sure they were educated and had read Luther about the 2 kingdoms, and were making some attempt to that end. Although they failed miserably.

 

[Bluesproverb]

I think were getting so engrossed in this that were missing something very important. Thermos is a company that makes a product that keeps things hot or cold but everyone calls a thermos "a thermos" regardless of the brand,(gott tote,igloo,Thermos coleman ect.) who all make similar products. People say their going to drink a coke all the time but stop at a store and come out with a Dr.Pepper,a Pepsi,root-beer ect. these companies have had to fight hard in court to keep their brand names from being taken away from them by usage.

Which leads me to my point in that were so focused on debating for or against homosexuality and marriage that their community is stealing a Jewish,Christian ect. symbol right from under our noses,,, the Rainbow. What is the oldest known document stating or showing it's symbolism,usage image ect. ? "Genesis 9" https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis 9&version=KJV it is the symbol of the Covenant God made between man the earth every living creature and himself it is not a symbol of homosexuality. We should all band together and legally have them stop using it as a symbol of homosexuality and trying to change it's original meaning. Tell them to "stop stealing the Rainbow".

They can't steal the rainbow because no one owns the rainbow.

What Christians can do is reclaim that symbol. There are Christian merchants who are doing that very thing.

https://www.zazzle.com/rainbow_bullies_bumper_sticker-128909052385496226


https://www.zazzle.com/rainbow_bumper_sticker-128520924684915861

 

[iamsoandso]

They can't steal the rainbow because no one owns the rainbow.

What Christians can do is reclaim that symbol. There are Christian merchants who are doing that very thing.

https://www.zazzle.com/rainbow_bullies_bumper_sticker-128909052385496226


https://www.zazzle.com/rainbow_bumper_sticker-128520924684915861

And see anyone who see's the book of Genesis as an inspired book should argue this because it isn't just a Christian writing the Jewish,Muslims, and Christians all see it as inspired by God. The issue is though that it is not a symbol of homosexuality...

 

[Bluesproverb]

And see anyone who see's the book of Genesis as an inspired book should argue this because it isn't just a Christian writing the Jewish,Muslims, and Christians all see it as inspired by God. The issue is though that it is not a symbol of homosexuality...

Of course it's not. The community of Sodom adopted the rainbow expressly to flaunt that OT account of Sodom and Gomorrahs destruction due to their immorality, which included homosexuality, by raising the rainbow God placed in the sky after the deluge that wiped sin from the world.

Basically the purpose of the rainbow being stolen to become the flag of Sodomites is to mock God's wiping their particular sin off the face of the earth with the flood. Because the Bible tells us God placed the 🌈 in the sky to show he would never vanquish sin,sinners, that way again.

Gays rallying behind the rainbow is intentional purposeful mockery of God. ''We're here, we're queer!''

That site I shared allows the rainbow design to transfer to car flags, shirts, license plates , license frames, posters, you name it.

 

[Roughsoul1991]

"Powers not specifically granted to the Federal Government in this Constitution are reserved by the individual states".

Meaning that Marriages are the sole purview of state control.

Any law that Congress manufactures concerning marriage is unconstitutional.

States hold that power exclusively and individually.
Meaning that if a biological brother and sister are granted a marriage license in New Jersey they cannot expect to be legally married in Tennessee....because that state outlaws such Marriages.

However a normal couple who are married in Tennessee are still married in New Jersey.
The Federal Government cannot intercede in such matters. It can't force TN to recognize the NJ marriage.

The only way we can make illegal in all 50 states LGBT marriage and all marriages outside of the Biblical marriage is by Amendment voted on by state legislatures.

I believe marriage as Biblically defined should be protected as an amendment but also saying that Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of marriage outside of the one permitted In this amendment.

This would make it a national thing.

 

[ResidentAlien]

How should we judge gay marriage? Well, it's insane if you ask me. However, we have to ask: Which has more eternal value, taking back the country or taking back the church? What is our priority as Christians?

I wonder how many gays have found Christ as a result of Christian rants about how evil they are? Or how wicked America is because of governmental policies and judicial decisions that have allowed gay marriage to flourish?

 

[Bluesproverb]

The only way we can make illegal in all 50 states LGBT marriage and all marriages outside of the Biblical marriage is by Amendment voted on by state legislatures.

I believe marriage as Biblically defined should be protected as an amendment but also saying that Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of marriage outside of the one permitted In this amendment.

This would make it a national thing.

It can't happen. The 14th amendment guarantees their civil right to enter the civil union afforded as a right to all qualified consenting adults.

Think about what we're proposing here as relates to individual states having a right to refuse a marriage license to gays.

The supremacy clause aside for a moment.

If we could compel a state to refuse them a license it would open the door for racists to insist interracial marriage licenses be refused. On a state by state basis.

This is all moot of course.
Especially with this news.

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/07/19/hou...iage-bill-after-supreme-court-roe-ruling.html

 

[Aaron56]

Ironically, many here are outlining the impetus for their own persecution at the hands of the people; Not as a righteous Bride, mind you, but as the Harlot who thinks changing terrestrial laws is the way to bring heaven to earth.

“And the ten horns which you saw on the beast, these will hate the harlot, make her desolate and naked, eat her flesh and burn her with fire."

This is because they have lost their saltiness:

“Salt is good; but if the salt has lost its flavor, how shall it be seasoned? 35 It is neither fit for the land nor for the dunghill, but men throw it out. He who has ears to hear, let him hear!”

E.G. They have lost their distinction as a righteous nation of God. Instead, they support liars and philanderers, the basest of men, thinking that they will bring about the kingdom of God on earth as it is in heaven. They are delusional beyond reach because God has set the delusion over them:

"The coming of the lawless one will be accompanied by the working of Satan, with every kind of power, sign, and false wonder, 10and with every wicked deception directed against those who are perishing, because they refused the love of the truth that would have saved them. 11For this reason God will send them a powerful delusion so that they believe the lie, 12in order that judgment may come upon all who have disbelieved the truth and delighted in wickedness."

Evil is wicked. But, when one claims to represent Christ and yet practices evil, it is an abomination.

 

[Roughsoul1991]

It can't happen. The 14th amendment guarantees their civil right to enter the civil union afforded as a right to all qualified consenting adults.

Think about what we're proposing here as relates to individual states having a right to refuse a marriage license to gays.

The supremacy clause aside for a moment.

If we could compel a state to refuse them a license it would open the door for racists to insist interracial marriage licenses be refused. On a state by state basis.

This is all moot of course.
Especially with this news.

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/07/19/hou...iage-bill-after-supreme-court-roe-ruling.html

No the 14th Amendment doesn't do that.

 

[Roughsoul1991]

It can't happen. The 14th amendment guarantees their civil right to enter the civil union afforded as a right to all qualified consenting adults.

Think about what we're proposing here as relates to individual states having a right to refuse a marriage license to gays.

The supremacy clause aside for a moment.

If we could compel a state to refuse them a license it would open the door for racists to insist interracial marriage licenses be refused. On a state by state basis.

This is all moot of course.
Especially with this news.

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/07/19/hou...iage-bill-after-supreme-court-roe-ruling.html

It isn't mute though because

The bill, which passed 267-157, was expected to make it through the Democrat majority of the House. But it faces an uncertain future in the Senate, where passage will require at least 10 Republican votes.

 

[Roughsoul1991]

Ironically, many here are outlining the impetus for their own persecution at the hands of the people; Not as a righteous Bride, mind you, but as the Harlot who thinks changing terrestrial laws is the way to bring heaven to earth.

“And the ten horns which you saw on the beast, these will hate the harlot, make her desolate and naked, eat her flesh and burn her with fire."

This is because they have lost their saltiness:

“Salt is good; but if the salt has lost its flavor, how shall it be seasoned? 35 It is neither fit for the land nor for the dunghill, but men throw it out. He who has ears to hear, let him hear!”

E.G. They have lost their distinction as a righteous nation of God. Instead, they support liars and philanderers, the basest of men, thinking that they will bring about the kingdom of God on earth as it is in heaven. They are delusional beyond reach because God has set the delusion over them:

"The coming of the lawless one will be accompanied by the working of Satan, with every kind of power, sign, and false wonder, 10and with every wicked deception directed against those who are perishing, because they refused the love of the truth that would have saved them. 11For this reason God will send them a powerful delusion so that they believe the lie, 12in order that judgment may come upon all who have disbelieved the truth and delighted in wickedness."

Evil is wicked. But, when one claims to represent Christ and yet practices evil, it is an abomination.

Would you want to legalize murder of every kind? How about rape? God forbid we legislate morality.

 

[Bluesproverb]

It isn't mute though because

The bill, which passed 267-157, was expected to make it through the Democrat majority of the House. But it faces an uncertain future in the Senate, where passage will require at least 10 Republican votes.

If the inauguration of Joe Biden taught us anything it should be that we can't trust Conservatives in Congress.

 

[Bluesproverb]

No the 14th Amendment doesn't do that.

Clearly it does because it did.

 

[JohnDB]

Of course it's not. The community of Sodom adopted the rainbow expressly to flaunt that OT account of Sodom and Gomorrahs destruction due to their immorality, which included homosexuality, by raising the rainbow God placed in the sky after the deluge that wiped sin from the world.

Basically the purpose of the rainbow being stolen to become the flag of Sodomites is to mock God's wiping their particular sin off the face of the earth with the flood. Because the Bible tells us God placed the 🌈 in the sky to show he would never vanquish sin,sinners, that way again.

Gays rallying behind the rainbow is intentional purposeful mockery of God. ''We're here, we're queer!''

That site I shared allows the rainbow design to transfer to car flags, shirts, license plates , license frames, posters, you name it.

I know...
But for whatever reason they seem to think that God only had one bow in his arsenal....

Nevermind the plague bow, fire bow, hail bow, locust bow, hornet bow, predator bow, and on and on they go....

God has a HUGE arsenal full of weapons. One got hung up....big deal....He has plenty more.

 

[Bluesproverb]

I know...
But for whatever reason they seem to think that God only had one bow in his arsenal....

Nevermind the plague bow, fire bow, hail bow, locust bow, hornet bow, predator bow, and on and on they go....

God has a HUGE arsenal full of weapons. One got hung up....big deal....He has plenty more.

Yes, and we're speaking of that one now, the rainbow.

😆

 

[GardenofWeeden]

My opinion....and only MY opinion (in other words I won't debate this, just laugh at anyone trying to debate me)

As a Christian, I am too busy being focused on my own salvation to know what anyone else should be doing with their lives. That is between God and the other people, and affects me none.

As an American citizen, I believe it should be up to the states.

 

[Bluesproverb]

My opinion....and only MY opinion (in other words I won't debate this, just laugh at anyone trying to debate me)

As a Christian, I am too buy being focused on my own salvation to know what anyone else should be doing with their lives. That is between God and the other people, and affects me none.

As an American citizen, I believe it should be up to the states.

Not debating your and only your opinion. Just jumping off on the idea of leaving a civil right up to the states.

Imagine. If the question of citizen equality were left to the states.....
Slavery would be legal in some states, illegal in others.
Interracial marriage, women's right to vote.

Well, in the matter of slavery it would have to first be decided if blacks qualify as human. State by state.