Research: Majority of Americans Believe Works Are the Key to Salvation

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
37,989
13,627
113
What does this mean in relation to the above?

John 6:70 Jesus answered them, Have not I chosen you twelve, and one of you is a devil?
in John 7:12 He calls Judas the son of perdition/destruction - the only one lost 'so that scripture may be fulfilled'
which scripture?
many, but probably primarily Genesis 3:15 - the seed of the serpent. He was never '
deceived' by Judas/Satan, but knew from the beginning what He must do, and what must be done to Him.

so why does God honor the one who is His enemy? that's a big question, thank you
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
37,989
13,627
113
Jesus is our reward, so we can now rob banks?
Jesus is our truth, so we can now lie?
Jesus is our faithfulness, so we can now cheat on the wife?
Jesus is our robe of righteousness, so we can now run around naked?

(do I really have to keep this up to prove that just because Jesus is our rest is no excuse to disregard the Sabbath commandment to rest?)
love does no harm to one's neighbor, therefore love is the fulfillment of the law.

no; you don't have to keep falsely accusing everyone who believes the gospel, entering His Rest.
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
61,191
30,325
113
just because Jesus is our rest is no excuse to disregard the Sabbath commandment to rest
We rest from works to obtain salvation. Is that really difficult to understand? Do you really not
understand that one is saved by grace, through faith, and not by works, that none can boast?



Ephesians 2:8-9

Romans 9:30-32 and 11:5-6
:)
 
Jan 31, 2021
8,658
1,064
113
FreeGrace2 said:
So v.26 says that those who "go on sinning deliberately" can't use the OT sacrificial system for their deliberate sins. So, what's left? No, not loss of salvation.
You add the word OTsystem this is ilegal
You really don't understand the book of HEBREWS, do you. The writer wrote to saved JEWS. The issue was that some were either returning to the OT sacrificial law system, or were thinking about returning to it? Why? They were being persecuted for their faith.

So the Law WAS an issue for them. The writer wa reminding them that since Christ died ONCE FOR ALL for sins, there is NO SACRIFICE left to offer. v.18 says so. So v.26 says the same thing. The ONLY THING left for those who do return to the sacrificial system of the OT will face God's discipline.
 
Jan 31, 2021
8,658
1,064
113
FreeGrace2 said:
So v.26 says that those who "go on sinning deliberately" can't use the OT sacrificial system for their deliberate sins. So, what's left? No, not loss of salvation.
Even you not sin anymore you can't use OT system, we are in NT now
Exactly. That was my point. The Jews who were turning back to the law or thinking about doing it needed reminding that since Christ died for sins ONCE FOR ALL, the OT system is obsolete and uneffective.

Instead, those believers would be facing God's painful discipline.
 
Jan 31, 2021
8,658
1,064
113
FreeGrace2 said:
OK, let's look at the verse:
12 Because of the increase of wickedness, the love of most will grow cold,
13 but the one who stands firm to the end will be saved.
There IS NOT 7 year tribulation! 2 Peter 3 says when Jesus comes as a thief, there won't be 7 more minutes down here, much less 7 more years! The 70 Weeks of Daniel expired right on time 490 years after the decree of Artaxerxes in 457 B.C.
This is a serious lack of understanding on your part. The Tribulation has 2 equal parts, each 3.5 years.

Oh, but you say "He didn't make an end of sins, he didn't bring in everlasting righteousness, etc." To that, Jesus says, "My kingdom is not of this world".
Oh, but I NEVER SAID THAT. So why do you just out and out LIE about what I have said? What is your problem?

You of the OSAS crowd ought to be the FIRST ones to claim you've been made righteous forever more by grace, as well as being "more than conquerors" when it comes to sin, right or wrong?
That is what I DO believe. But the corrrect Greek word is "declared", not the corrupted Latin "made".

When a person believes the gospel, they are declared righteous. They have the imputed righteousness of Jesus Christ.
 
Jan 31, 2021
8,658
1,064
113
FreeGrace2 said:
They don't need to be "qualified" by anything. They are straightforward words. And I don't use Jn 6:39 with 10:28, but 5:24, which states very clearly WHEN a person is given eternal life; which is when they become believers. You cannot explain what Jesus was meaning in either verse, or you would have by now.
What about the Unmerciful Servant who was forgiven but later condemned?
It's a parable. They weren't used to teach doctrine.

What about the repentant saints who "fall away" into perpetual impenitence?
They will face God's painful discipline (Heb 12:11) and be miserable, even if you don't see it on their faces. And they STILL shall never perish, as Jesus said so clearly.

What about the "escaped" saints who become again tangled in the filth of the world?
Peter said clearly that "the end will be worse", meaning the rest of their miserable lives on earth.

What about saint Paul's fear of becoming a "castaway" -- because of a lighter crown? No! Because Paul knew David said "cast me not away...take not Thy Holy Spirit from me" and Paul himself wrote, "If any man hath not the Spirit of God, he is none of His". Saint Paul feared the possibility of being lost.
Nonsense. He never feared loss of salvation, because he taught eternal security just as Jesus did. What he did fear was being disqualified for eternal reward. Losing out on reward above and beyond simply being in heaven.

What about the saints who willfully sin after receiving (not just hearers, but receivers) a knowledge of the truth, to whom "there is no more sacrifice for sin"?
The author tells us clearly. Expect God's painful discipline. v.27

Correction: none of your verses teach OSAS because there are too many verses that qualify God's promises as conditional.
Pure nonsense. Then tell me exactly what Jesus meant by His very clear words in John 10:28.

This is what He said: I give them eternal life and they SHALL NEVER PERISH.

Maybe you just won't actually read the verse, but Jesus made very clear that on the basis of Him giving eternal life, the recipient shall never perish.

So, what do you think He REALLY meant by all that?

I prefer to hold my critics' feet to the fire and make them defend their accusations, plain and simple.
And I DO!! Unlike yourself.

btw, all your "what about...." questions are ridiculous. Quit worrying about others. Focus on your OWN rejection of clear doctrine.

I am truly amazed that those who believe that salvation can be lost seem so unconcerned with the clear words of Jesus that refuted their beliefs. I would think rejecting what Jesus said in John 10:28 would shake you guys to your boots.

Your view contradicts Jesus directly. Since you believe salvation can be lost, you'd better be shaking when you do that.
 
Jan 31, 2021
8,658
1,064
113
FreeGrace2 said:
Maybe you aren't aware of the KISS principle. It means Keep It Simple, Stupid.

You violate that principle by taking much less clear verses and try to "explain" or "clarify" what MUCH MORE clear verses say.

So you have it exactly backwards.

In John 10:28 Jesus said that recipients of eternal life shall never perish.

The ONLY thing that needs to be clarified in this verse is WHEN a person becomes a recipient.

That is found in John 5:24. Jesus said believers POSSESS eternal life.

So, a person becomes a recipient of eternal life WHEN they become a believer.

It couldn't be more clear.
I've heard of KISS a long time ago. It's derived from Thoreau's "simplify, simplify".

However, when it comes to Scripture, we ought say KISS, too: KEEP IT SCRIPTURAL, STUPID.
Can you explain HOW both John 5:24 and 10:28 aren't Scriptural? What a stupid comment.

We do that by reading "line upon line, precept upon precept, here a little, there a little", not reading one verse and ignoring all others which have their impact on a subject.
OK then, apply that to both John 5:24 and 10:28 and tell me what Jesus was teaching.

Once again, you seem to think the 2 verses I use to prove eternal security are trumped by MORE verses that teach the opposite.

If there are ANY verses that teach loss of salvation, then neither John 5:24 or 10:28 can be teaching eternal security.

So why haven't you just taken these 2 verses apart to show me HOW they cannot be teaching the doctrine that you hate?

I've EASILY explained how ALL of the verses you throw out DON'T teach loss of salvation. But you are just not listening. Your ears and eyes are closed to truth.

Not a good thing to do for one who thinks salvation can be lost.
 
Aug 3, 2019
3,744
507
113
Your mistaken again. Loving others as Christ loved us, is not in the law.
It is in the law, in Deuteronomy 6:5 KJV. That's why the Two New aren't "new in existence", but "new in concept" to rigid, unmerciful Jews which Christ was trying to convert.
Further, the commandment to believe in Jesus, is also not listed in the law.
By this, you are essentially saying God promised a Messiah but left the decision to believe or not believe in Him up to the individual.
I have a huge problem with anyone pedaling the law.
Then you have a problem with Jesus who said "not one jot or tittle shall in any wise pass from the law until all is fulfilled"; you have a problem with James who said the "doers of the law shall be justified"; you have a problem with Paul who said "he that doeth righteousness is righteous"; you have a problem with John who said "he that saith I know Him and keepeth not His commandments is a liar".

Why do people have a problem with the Biblical notion that obedience to the Ten Commandments is merely evidence Jesus is enthroned in the heart keeping them for us who can't keep them ourselves?

Because they don't want to accept the truth that disregarding them is evidence He's nowhere to be found.
 
Aug 3, 2019
3,744
507
113
FreeGrace2, please disregard post # 1750 - somehow your name got mixedup with my reply to Inquisitor due to massive distractions happening at the moment. All those replies were intended to be for Inquisitor. My apologies.
 
Aug 3, 2019
3,744
507
113
Brother, you don't need to prove anything but if you have jesus you have a rest.
Well, not exactly. Paul says "prove all things, hold fast to that which is good". If Jesus being our rest allows us to break the 4th commandment, then Jesus being our truth allows us to break the 9th commandment, right or wrong?
Not only Saturday but Jesus give you rest in mind every day
Yes! And Paul says in Hebrews 4:9-10 Lamsa's Peshitta that those who rest inwardly in Jesus are to demonstrate that inward rest by outwardly resting from our work on the 7th day as God did from His work.
Why you do ritual rest like ritual animal sacrifice?
Because God commands us to keep the Sabbath holy and I want to "keep His commandments and do those things which are pleasing in His sight".
Sabbath law is for OT
The Sabbath was created before Moses and will be kept in New Jerusalem - it's ludicrous to claim there's a temporary suspension of a law which God codified by writing it with His own finger in stone.
Now we have new law, it is emphasize in what in your mind It was adultery when you have sex with other than your wife. Now Jesus say if you look woman with lust you do commit adultery. We need to have jesus in our heart than we have rest, not physical rest
Yes, Jesus came to "magnify the law and make it honorable" (Isaiah 42:21 KJV) which He did by calling lust adultery and hate murder.

Now, I ask you, does a magnifying glass destroy, make disappear, obscure, alter, suspend the thing over which it is placed, or does it make more clear, make more evident, make more apparent, more powerful a confirmation of the thing's existence and continued existence?
 
Jan 31, 2021
8,658
1,064
113
FreeGrace2, please disregard post # 1750 - somehow your name got mixedup with my reply to Inquisitor due to massive distractions happening at the moment. All those replies were intended to be for Inquisitor. My apologies.
Of course. I take nothing personally so there is no need to apologize.

However, you quoted me here:
FreeGrace2 said:
I have a huge problem with anyone pedaling the law.

Then you responded with:
[/QUOTE]"Then you have a problem with Jesus who said "not one jot or tittle shall in any wise pass from the law until all is fulfilled"[/QUOTE]
Jesus came to fulfill the Law. No human being is capable of doing that. Read Romans 2-4 and you will see that truth.

Do you think you are fulfilling the Law?

you have a problem with James who said the "doers of the law shall be justified"
I don't have a problem with James. I understand him. He wasn't talking about God justifying people based on being a doer of the Law, as you seem to think. James' whole point was about demonstrating one's faith to others so that they can see your faith.

v.28 summarizes what James was talking about:

But someone will say, “You have faith; I have deeds.” Show me your faith without deeds, and I will show you my faith by my deeds.

In all the English translations of this verse, they all put the quote marks as the quote above. However, that makes no sense.

This is the correct placement of the quote marks:

But someone will say, “You have faith; I have deeds. Show me your faith without deeds, and I will show you my faith by my deeds."

iow, the entire verse after "but someone will say" is by that someone.

What he is saying is a challenge to someone else that the other has faith but he has deeds/works. The challenge for the someone else is to show him their faith without deeds, and he will show that someone else his fasith BY his deeds.

Very simple, really. James' point is that NO ONE can show/demonstrate their faith to OTHERS apart from deeds/works.

All the nonsense about faith without works means no salvation is totally off the mark.

So 2:24 isn't about God's justification. This is what messed up Martin Luther. He (and tons of believers today) thought James WAS talking about God's justification. He wasn't. He was talking about being justified in the eyes of others, when they SEE your faith by your DEEDS.

The point of being justified "in the eyes of others" means to avoid being seen as a hypocrite. iow, being consistent. If you claim to be a Christian, then ACT like one. Too many believers act like everyone else.

Rom 12:17 - Never pay back evil for evil to anyone. Respect what is right in the sight of all men.

This verse specifically notes the perspective of others.

Rom 14:18 - For he who in this way serves Christ is acceptable to God and approved by men.

This verse directly notes how our lifestyle is acceptable/approved by God and by men.

2 Cor 5:12 - We are not again commending ourselves to you but are giving you an occasion to be proud of us, so that you will have an answer for those who take pride in appearance and not in heart.

Man cannot see the heart; only God can, which is where our faith is. So, by living our our faith, we have an answer for those who take pride in appearance.

2 Cor 8:21 - for we have regard for what is honorable, not only in the sight of the Lord, but also in the sight of men.

This could not be more clear: in the sight of the Lord (for justification) and in the sight of men (for their approval or justification).

Col 4:5 - Be wise in the way you act toward outsiders; make the most of every opportunity.

1 Tim 3:7 - And he must have a good reputation with those outside the church, so that he will not fall into reproach and the snare of the devil.

Clearly speaking of having a good testimony before others (outside the church-unbelievers), which avoids the charge of hypocrisy.

1 Thess 4:12 - so that you will behave properly toward outsiders and not be in any need.

Ditto

1 Pet 2:12 - Keep your behavior excellent among the Gentiles, so that in the thing in which they slander you as evildoers, they may because of your good deeds, as they observe them, glorify God in the day of visitation.

Clearly Peter is emphasizing that believers who live out their faith, not being hypocrites, will have a positive effect upon unbelievers.

1 Jn 3:18 - Little children, let us not love with word or with tongue, but in deed and truth.

This is directly linked to James 2:15,16; the example of the believer who told people "be warmed and filled" but didn't do anything to meet their needs. He was a blatant hypocrite. iow, he "loved only with word or tongue", but definitely not "in deed and truth".

These verses demonstrate the importance of how others view the believer.

And, 2:15,16 is a clear example of how NOT to demonstrate your faith; just give lip service, which is nothing other than hypocrisy.

[QOUTE]you have a problem with Paul who said "he that doeth righteousness is righteous"; you have a problem with John who said "he that saith I know Him and keepeth not His commandments is a liar".[/QUOTE]
When you consider all the verses about the Law, esp Rom 2-4, it is clear that NO ONE can "keep the Law".

Why do people have a problem with the Biblical notion that obedience to the Ten Commandments is merely evidence Jesus is enthroned in the heart keeping them for us who can't keep them ourselves?
That isn't the problem. The problem is when believers claim salvation is kept or maintained by keeping the Law, which your posts seem to claim.
 
Aug 3, 2019
3,744
507
113
Have you ever heard the Bill Engvall joke.."Here's your sign"?
God gives us signs, which we ignore and he probably looks at us like.."Really"?
When we begin to see these signs...then we know just how foolish we are to God.
A question you should ask yourself....Is there temptation,...when these girls walk by your place of business?
But I say unto you, that whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart. (Matthew 5:28)
If there is...it's because the heart has not been changed.
For out of the heart proceed evil thoughts, murders, adulteries, fornications, thefts, false witness, blasphemies:
(Matthew 15:19)

According to Jesus....The temptation....is your sign.
Whoa whoa whoa, brother! It ain't a sin to be tempted, but to YIELD to temptation. The intrepid Martin Luther said you can't stop the birds from flying overhead, but you can keep them from building a nest in your hair.

As sure as I'm born a man, I know full well the instant one of those half naked prostitutes crosses my line of sight, the choice before me is to either keep looking until I'm overcome with lustful thoughts, or immediately look away and ask God to redirect my thoughts and thank Him in advance for answering my prayer. For the man who truly loves God, there's only one consistent choice, and such a man is exactly what this world needs in these times of widespread infidelity toward both God and good Christian women.

If there are any real Christian men out there who know what I'm talking about, let me hear you say "AMEN" --- then go find you a weak, defeated, whining OSAS man and show him the way of the "overcomer in Christ".
 
Aug 3, 2019
3,744
507
113
you don't have to keep falsely accusing everyone who believes the gospel, entering His Rest.
Are accusations necessary when the guilty proudly and publicly admit to violating God's Ten Commandments? By their own mouths, they are condemned.

All that remains is a soon coming verdict from the Judgment seat of Christ, followed by the sentence of capital punishment.
 
Aug 3, 2019
3,744
507
113
We rest from works to obtain salvation. Is that really difficult to understand? Do you really not
understand that one is saved by grace, through faith, and not by works, that none can boast?



Ephesians 2:8-9

Romans 9:30-32 and 11:5-6
:)
Please, enough with these popular yet erroneous platitudes!

Hebrews 4:10 plainly says the rest of which we are to partake is the same kind of rest of which God did partake:

"For he that hath entered His rest, he hath ceased from his own works as God did from His."

Did God rest from "works to obtain salvation" ? No. Which makes your claim our rest is from "works to obtain salvation" unequivocally wrong.

He rested from literal, physical work...and we who rest in Christ demonstrate that inward rest by resting outwardly from literal, physical work on the 7th day "as God did from His".
 
Aug 3, 2019
3,744
507
113
FreeGrace2 said:
OK, let's look at the verse:
12 Because of the increase of wickedness, the love of most will grow cold,
13 but the one who stands firm to the end will be saved.
Wow, not a single verse in all Scripture referring to a "7 year tribulation divided into two 3.5 parts" yet here you are preaching it.

Chapter and verse, please...
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
23,861
8,637
113
Please, enough with these popular yet erroneous platitudes!

Hebrews 4:10 plainly says the rest of which we are to partake is the same kind of rest of which God did partake:

"For he that hath entered His rest, he hath ceased from his own works as God did from His."

Did God rest from "works to obtain salvation" ? No. Which makes your claim our rest is from "works to obtain salvation" unequivocally wrong.

He rested from literal, physical work...and we who rest in Christ demonstrate that inward rest by resting outwardly from literal, physical work on the 7th day "as God did from His".
That is some serious "externalism" problem you've got there friend.
Just to let you know the 10 Commandments were to be approached in/by faith.
And may I refresh your memory in saying that the promises we cling to were made to Abraham who predated the Law.
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
23,861
8,637
113
Wow, not a single verse in all Scripture referring to a "7 year tribulation divided into two 3.5 parts" yet here you are preaching it.

Chapter and verse, please...
A Greek linear thinking process will never do in endeavoring to rightly interpreting Scripture.
But yeah there's absolutely no doubt whatsoever that the 7 year tribulation is divided into two 3.5 parts. Exquisitely delineated if you care to look for it.
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
23,861
8,637
113
Are accusations necessary when the guilty proudly and publicly admit to violating God's Ten Commandments? By their own mouths, they are condemned.

All that remains is a soon coming verdict from the Judgment seat of Christ, followed by the sentence of capital punishment.
Well let me ask you this: Are all Christian males to be circumcised? This being THE preeminent necessity required by the law of Moses.

Please back up your position with NT Scripture.