Your right, its not a Game, And when people see us in error. We should listen to them. Not mock them..Well that's good of you, because for me, ones salvation is not a game.
But to each his own.
Your right, its not a Game, And when people see us in error. We should listen to them. Not mock them..Well that's good of you, because for me, ones salvation is not a game.
Now read this to yourself.Well unless you can turn a well respected teacher, a teacher of the caliber of one like Billy Graham, it's impossible for us to change their minds. Look what Jesus had to do to convince Paul.
Gods Holy Spirit is the only way to change their minds...but in order for him to do this, they need to put their trust him. Like the song says. "Trust and obey...there is no other way..To be happy in Jesus...But to trust and Obey.
Now read this to yourself.
I love it when hypocrites come in trying to tell people they are wrong. Then bring up this strawman
Yep, if we saved Jesus dwell in our heart than will bear fruit and the fruit of the Holy Spirit is love, love the needy that why Jesus poor, love stranger mean not racism etc after I ponder for long time I just aware that not love the stranger or racism will make go to hellNotice the difference between the sheep and the goats....those who keep the Law of Christ...those who didn't. Again..for those who are watching...again...two different types of followers. Those who keep the commands of Christ and those who don't.
And before Him shall be gathered all nations, and He shall separate them one from another as a shepherd divideth his sheep from the goats. And He shall set the sheep on His right hand, but the goats on the left. Then shall the King say unto them on His right hand, ‘Come, ye blessed of My Father, inherit the Kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world. For I hungered, and ye gave Me meat; I was thirsty, and ye gave Me drink; I was a stranger, and ye took Me in; naked, and ye clothed Me; I was sick, and ye visited Me; I was in prison, and ye came unto Me.’ Then shall the righteous answer Him, saying, ‘Lord, when saw we Thee hungering and fed Thee, or thirsty and gave Thee drink? When saw we Thee a stranger and took Thee in, or naked and clothed Thee? Or when saw we Thee sick, or in prison, and came unto Thee?’ And the King shall answer and say unto them, ‘Verily I say unto you, inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these My brethren, ye have done it unto Me.’ “Then shall He say also unto them on the left hand, ‘Depart from Me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire prepared for the devil and his angels. For I hungered, and ye gave Me no meat; I was thirsty, and ye gave Me no drink; I was a stranger, and ye took Me not in; naked, and ye clothed Me not; sick and in prison, and ye visited Me not.’ Then shall they also answer Him, saying, ‘Lord, when saw we Thee hungering or athirst or a stranger, or naked or sick or in prison, and did not minister unto Thee?’ Then shall He answer them, saying, ‘Verily I say unto you, inasmuch as ye did it not to one of the least of these, ye did it not to Me.’ And these shall go away into everlasting punishment, but the righteous into life eternal.”
(Matthew 25:32-46)
Something to think about folks...just something to think about.
The problem you have with your interpretation is God chose the nation of Israel. That was physical Israel, the descendants of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.Did not God lead "the mixed multitude" out of the land of Egypt which were comprised of Gentiles? They were not exempt from keeping the Ten Commandments. God also expected "the stranger that is within thy gates" to keep the Sabbath. Also, Gentiles were able to "take hold of my covenant" and keep the Sabbath "from polluting it". It is simply wrong to claim only Israel was expected to keep the Ten Commandments.
So you can commit sorcery, kidnap children, afflict orphans, because you threw the law in the bin. I do not think your interpretation is correct.Did you miss the part where James said, "If thou commit no adultery, yet thou kill, thou art become a transgressor of the law"? Yes, a transgressor of the TEN COMMANDMENTS. Notice, James DID NOT SAY you're a transgressor of the law if you don't get circumcised or fail to bring a lamb to slaughter, because he knew the Mosaic Law was nailed to the Cross 30 years ago but the Ten Commandments "stand fast forever and ever and are done in truth and uprightness".
Really? I've already told you that you have to answer my question before I'll answer any of yours. Why won't you comply?To make it simple let me ask you a question
And He also SAID in very PLAIN WORDS that recipients of eternal life shall never perish.Matt 24:13
13 But he that shall aendure unto the end, the same shall be saved.
I do believe what Jesus say But ......endure to the end .....shall be save
The word save is in Matt 24 :13 not losing reward but save, why you ad or change the verse?And He also SAID in very PLAIN WORDS that recipients of eternal life shall never perish.
So, IF IF IF you believe that Matt 24:13 is about soul salvation, what in the world do you think Jesus was teaching in John 10:28?
Do you believe that if a person does not endure, in trusting Jesus for salvation. Then that person who falls into unbelief and is not saved?Really? I've already told you that you have to answer my question before I'll answer any of yours. Why won't you comply?
As for simple, this is what I posted in my last post:
FreeGrace2 said:
Please allow me to make this perfectly clear to you.
I believe that WHEN Jesus gives the gift of eternal life, they POSSESS eternal life. John 5:24 says this.
I believe that WHEN Jesus gives the gift of eternal life, the recipient SHALL NEVER perish. John 10:28 says this.
Why don't you believe the Bible and what Jesus says?
You are very confused. The verse about enduring to the end isn't even about salvation. If you lack spiritual discernment, you will not be able to understand any of this.
What isn't simple about that?
When you accept Jesus, what happen, chose what you believe
1. Jesus dwell in you
2. Jesus can dwell in you or not it doesn't matter you still save
I know that, and is not support for your position: you keep saying only Israel had to keep laws like the weekly Sabbath, but I've shown you that even Gentiles who repented from idolatry and turned to follow Jehovah adopted the laws of God like keeping the Sabbath, right or wrong?Gentile nations were never required to be circumcised but the nation of Israel, by law, was required to be circumcised.
That's not my interpretation because I argue the Ten Commandments "stand fast forever and ever", not that they occupy the dust bin.So you can commit sorcery, kidnap children, afflict orphans, because you threw the law in the bin. I do not think your interpretation is correct.
I don't know which Bible you're reading, but my KJV says "love is the fulfilling of the law" - which says don't steal, don't lie, don't have other gods before God, etc.On the subject of the ten commandments, not stealing something from someone, is not an act of love towards someone.
You're limiting the definition of "love" to 1 Corinthians 13, which I've shown you above is not so.Love was defined by Paul.
1 Corinthians 13:4-7
Love is patient, love is kind, it is not jealous; love does not brag, it is not arrogant. It does not act disgracefully, it does not seek its own benefit; it is not provoked, does not keep an account of a wrong suffered, it does not rejoice in unrighteousness, but rejoices with the truth; it keeps every confidence, it believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things.
No it isn't, it's based on Bible verses like 1 John 5:3 KJV which says "agape" love is demonstrated by happily keeping God's commandments.Not stealing is not an act of love. Not telling lies also is not an act of love.
Your interpretation is a traditional interpretation based primarily on the Catholic Church tradition.
"Natural Law" has more to do with undermining the Ten Commandments than it does establishing them, according to the encyclical Rerum Novarum. For instance, "Natural Law" says all goods are "common" so the RCC says it's lawful for a person to steal from one who has abundance in order to satisfy the need of another who has nothing -- God says "thou shalt not steal" but the Catholic church says, "thou shalt steal and feel good about doing it".The Reformers also followed that tradition, i.e., ten commandments equals natural law.
Seem to me he believe once people believe and deny Jesus not endure to the end still save only lose they reward, and I believe who ever deny Jesus in front of man Jesus will deny them in front of the father and that man not saveDo you believe that if a person does not endure, in trusting Jesus for salvation. Then that person who falls into unbelief and is not saved?
Incorrect, the only folk under the law were the Jews.I know that, and is not support for your position: you keep saying only Israel had to keep laws like the weekly Sabbath, but I've shown you that even Gentiles who repented from idolatry and turned to follow Jehovah adopted the laws of God like keeping the Sabbath, right or wrong?
The answer is right. If the Christian is free from an obligation to keep the Ten Commandments, please tell us which of the Ten Commandments are we at liberty to break?
We differ on that point.Seem to me he believe once people believe and deny Jesus not endure to the end still save only lose they reward, and I believe who ever deny Jesus in front of man Jesus will deny them in front of the father and that man not save
Your Bible and my Bible are written differently.That's not my interpretation because I argue the Ten Commandments "stand fast forever and ever", not that they occupy the dust bin.
I don't know which Bible you're reading, but my KJV says "love is the fulfilling of the law" - which says don't steal, don't lie, don't have other gods before God, etc.
You're limiting the definition of "love" to 1 Corinthians 13, which I've shown you above is not so.
No it isn't, it's based on Bible verses like 1 John 5:3 KJV which says "agape" love is demonstrated by happily keeping God's commandments.
"Natural Law" has more to do with undermining the Ten Commandments than it does establishing them, according to the encyclical Rerum Novarum. For instance, "Natural Law" says all goods are "common" so the RCC says it's lawful for a person to steal from one who has abundance in order to satisfy the need of another who has nothing -- God says "thou shalt not steal" but the Catholic church says, "thou shalt steal and feel good about doing it".
Negative, the Catholics placed the emphasis on the ten commandments. They called it moral law, you belong to a daughter church because you claim exactly the same thing.That's not my interpretation because I argue the Ten Commandments "stand fast forever and ever", not that they occupy the dust bin.
I don't know which Bible you're reading, but my KJV says "love is the fulfilling of the law" - which says don't steal, don't lie, don't have other gods before God, etc.
You're limiting the definition of "love" to 1 Corinthians 13, which I've shown you above is not so.
No it isn't, it's based on Bible verses like 1 John 5:3 KJV which says "agape" love is demonstrated by happily keeping God's commandments.
"Natural Law" has more to do with undermining the Ten Commandments than it does establishing them, according to the encyclical Rerum Novarum. For instance, "Natural Law" says all goods are "common" so the RCC says it's lawful for a person to steal from one who has abundance in order to satisfy the need of another who has nothing -- God says "thou shalt not steal" but the Catholic church says, "thou shalt steal and feel good about doing it".
We differ on that point.
Anyone who does not call on the name of Jesus is an unbeliever. You only gain salvation by believing in the death and resurrection of Jesus. If your faith fails, so do you.
Let say a man call tha name of Jesus than Muslim come ask that man back to Muslim or killed that man scare and deny Jesus
Do you believe that man saved only lose his reward or lose his salvation?
You must believe to be saved. If that man did not believe in Jesus, then he cannot be saved.Let say a man call tha name of Jesus than Muslim come ask that man back to Muslim or killed that man scare and deny Jesus
Do you believe that man saved only lose his reward or lose his salvation?