This second sentence is a grammatical nightmare. I think it's supposed to read:
"If we believe this [1cor15:3] is true; baptism's biblical significance starts to make sense in Paul's writings. How is baptism related to the cross where Jesus dies for my sins?".
Hopefully, that's a good rendering. Regardless: if you mean to say that Romans is referring to water baptism, you definitely need to demonstrate why you think it is about water baptism; because nothing in that chapter suggests water. "Walking in newness of life" does not come from the power of water.
“if you mean to say that Romans is referring to water baptism, you definitely need to demonstrate why you think it is about water baptism;”
yes this is exactly why we don’t learn anything about baptism we try create a different baptism to replace the one baptism
Paul wrote this true or not ?
“There is one body, and one Spirit, even as ye are called in one hope of your calling;
one Lord, one faith, one baptism,”
Ephesians 4:4-5 KJV
So at this point if Paul is saying “ there’s one baptism “ how many different baptisms are there ?
And if Paul says plainly and clearly right there without any dispute “ there’s one baptism “ then what other baptism is Paul talking about ? Not this one I guess ?
Either Philip just didn’t get it or the one baptism has never changed
“And as they went on their way, they came unto a certain water: and the eunuch said, See, here is water; what doth hinder me to be baptized? And Philip said, If thou believest with all thine heart, thou mayest. And he answered and said, I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God. And he commanded the chariot to stand still: and they went down both into the water, both Philip and the eunuch; and he baptized him.”
Acts 8:36-38 KJV
clearly you would agree that Philip baptized this man in water right ? So is Philip practicing a wrong baptism?
or Peter how about this one didn’t Peter understand either ?
“While Peter yet spake these words,
the Holy Ghost fell on all them which heard the word. And they of the circumcision which believed were astonished, as many as came with Peter, because that
on the Gentiles also was poured out the gift of the Holy Ghost.
Peter answered and said ,
Can any man forbid water, that these should not be baptized, which have received the Holy Ghost as well as we? And
he commanded them to be baptized in the name of the Lord. Then prayed they him to tarry certain days.”
Acts 10:44-45, 47-48 KJV
so given there is only the one baptism for remission of sins given as instruction tonthe church and the other baptism mentioned is a resulting promise that the person will then receive the Holy Ghost. How are you coming to the conclusion there’s a different baptism that doesn’t involve water ?
remember Paul said there’s one baptism are we to believe John the Baptist he didn’t establish baptism for remission of sins by Gods command ? John the Baptist had baptism wrong ?
there’s just baptism for remission of sins John never said tithing but “ Jesus will later baptize you with the Holy Ghost “
That’s not an instruction for us to baptize one another but a promise thy at Jesus will accomplish and did johns reference was about pentocost when Christ shed forth the Holy Ghost
as you see clearly they kept baptizing for remission of sins and yes in water why water ?
the water has nothing to do with anything obeying the form of baptism given tonthe church by God matters he is the one who sent John baptizing in water for remission of sins not anyone else it’s Gods design that makes it valuable
same as communion of we say “ it’s just bread and wine “ it has no significance
were
Missing the point of what faith is “ Jesus took the bread and said
take this is my body eat and took the wine and said
drink this is my blood shed for remission of sins
when we take communion we should t say “ this bread has no meaning “ this wine is just plain old wine “ we need to operate by what Christ says so when we take communion and they bless the bread we’re supposed to believe that we’re partaking of Jesus body and blood not that we’re performing a meaningless ritual eating a piece of bread but that we are communing with the body and blood Of Jesus what makes it significant is thy at it’s designed by God it’s based on what Jesus said about the bread and wine of communion
if we take communion and don’t understand what we’re doing it’s not coming from faith if we say “ the bread is just bread and the wine is just wine “ there’s no communion but if we’re doing what God said for the reason he said then we are communing with the body and blood of Jesus
baptism is the same way the water matters because God established it for remission
Of sins
in Romans 6 Paul’s describing how you are buried beneath the water and then are lifted up from the water
it’s definately about baptism d remember there’s just the one baptism given Tony’s the church and another that Christ promises to perform for us sending the Holy Ghost
it’s working against ourself to create different baptisms where only one exists everything you read in scripture that has the word baptism in the sentance is talking about the one baptism for remission of sins in christs name
we can’t learn much because we argue over the simplest things baptism in water is designed by God made plain and clear by God it’s the only baptism e church is given to actually perform on each other Baptist’s baptize people who believe in Jesus name it’s simple stuff basic
Paul is teaching about baptism the same baptism Peter and the apostles were baptized with and Paul received the same Holy Ghost that Peter and the others did
there’s just the one baptism the spirit comes through promise remission of sins comes through repentance and baptism believing that Jesus does for your sins you then accept it and get baptized in his name that means this
“Know ye not, that so many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ were baptized into his death? Therefore we are buried with him by baptism into death: that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life. For if we have been planted together in the likeness of his death, we shall be also in the likeness of his resurrection: Likewise reckon ye also yourselves to be dead indeed unto sin, but alive unto God through Jesus Christ our Lord.”
Romans 6:3-5, 11 KJV
everything Paul’s saying there is about baltism how we go beneath the water and are buried with Christ and are raised up from the water d born anew in Christ.
if you remove water from baptism what’s left we’re they just saying “I baptize you “ of so why is Paul explainkng the process of being baptized into his death , buried with him and raised up with him ? Regarding baptism
sort of odd that we Christians are so far apart on the basics of Christianity but that happens I suppose
if we can agree that there’s just one baptism we could make progress but it doesn’t always happen Peter and Philip were either practicing baptism I. Water like it says and had it all wrong , or baltism hasn’t changed at all but for the name of Jesus.
baptism is simple it’s hard to understand how simple things like that become such a contentious issue