Answer the question yourself first.So wherefrom did you get the forbidden knowledge of good & evil which you have in your heart now?
Answer the question yourself first.So wherefrom did you get the forbidden knowledge of good & evil which you have in your heart now?
One preacher I know said that we need to give God everything. Then He will allow us to have what we need to live. I like Watchman Nee's take: God has not got your heart until He has your wallet. He was amazing. He traveled China and went overseas, and never asked for any support. His role model was George Muller, who likewise refused to ask for money. God provided in amazing ways.You are so right ---Tithing may be an individual choice today ---but for all the good God does for us ----we grumble over giving back to God what is His anyway ---All God ask for is 10% He could have ask for 90% but He only asks for 10 ---so we should be grateful for that and tithe and give with joy ------
God's promise is to look after us and we have to trust in that and not look at tithing as a burden but as the Agape we have for God and the want to help sow into His kingdom -----
The Widow's Might is a good example ------she gave all she had -her trust and Love for God showed through Greatly ----while the rich only gave a small portion ---and Jesus was aware and watching the scripture says and that is in the New Testament -----so while it is a choice to tithe and give ----Agape and trust is involved in the matter --
View attachment 237797
"Good measure" hints the 10th standard. The tenth standard is still in the New Testament. In giving it start to a no more than the tenth, the principle is sowing and reaping, the more you give the more you be blessed.
Some people go to the church of their choice. Then there's others who go where God leads them.
In order to serve the Lord, one needs to know where He sends them. Wouldn't you agree?
Giving is one of the most important and most abused aspects of the Christian life. When you see the prosperity crowd plunder the church for their own benefit,
The scripture gave us the general principle of a good measure to hint tithe. While giving of offerings other than tithing is superfluous and is not measured as the tenth. Of, course, as v45 says A good man out of the good treasure of his heart bringeth forth that which us good. Tithing principle is not abolish in the New Testament. Why? Because it is base on faith and faith still exist.Neither of these claims has any grounding in Scripture. You're inventing things to support your belief. That's called eisegesis.
Tithing has nothing whatsoever to do with faith. It is obedience to an OT law that does not apply to Christians.The scripture gave us the general principle of a good measure to hint tithe. While giving of offerings other than tithing is superfluous and is not measured as the tenth. Of, course, as v45 says A good man out of the good treasure of his heart bringeth forth that which us good. Tithing principle is not abolish in the New Testament. Why? Because it is base on faith and faith still exist.
I could say a lot reguarding this comment. But instead, how about you read this and connect the dots yourself
“The elders who rule well are to be considered worthy of double price, especially those who work hard at preaching and teaching. For the Scripture says, “you shall not muzzle the ox while he is threshing,” and “The laborer is worthy of his wages.”” (1 Timothy 5:17–18)
“You yourselves also know, Philippians, that at the first preaching of the gospel, after I left Macedonia, no church shared with me in the matter of giving and receiving but you alone; for even in Thessalonica you sent a gift more than once for my needs. Not that I seek the gift itself, but I seek for the profit which increases to your account. But I have received everything in full and have an abundance; I am amply supplied, having received from Epaphroditus what you have sent, a fragrant aroma, an acceptable sacrifice, well-pleasing to God.” (Philippians 4:15–18)View attachment 237777
(1 Cor 9)
This principle of amply supplying our spiritual leaders (elders) can cause hindrances in the minds of some because they assume pastors do their work for the wrong reason, but it is absolutely Biblical.
To put it concisely, elders should never ask to be amply paid, but they also shouldn't have to.
If a church fellowship is healthy and thriving, the elders are biblically qualified. So they are men of truth, passionate, caring for the flock, good stewards, holy, etc. They are worthy of the double price. Healthy churches are generous churches ("God loves a generous giver"). When the people are generous, it is not difficult to amply pay the elders with plenty left over to give to the needy and other ministries. When we pay them well, it enables them to do what they're called to do full-time. And that is the most profitable thing for you and I and the rest of the body in the local confregation.
Can they? YesDo they take the Bible seriously if they don't teach to repent from choosing the forbidden knowledge of good & evil violating God's command in Genesis 2: 17 & which resulted in God's wrath?
"The laborer is worthy of his wages" (1 Tim 5:18)elders of those days weren’t receiving a paycheck
I'm not sure if you're referring to bi-vocational elders or something else. If someone is truly called to eldership, they should take it seriously and wholly devote themselves to their congregation and be generously financially supplied ("double price").today pastors already make a living and are paid by whatever institution employs them.
With all respect, doctrinally, I don't care what you prefer or are interested in or what you'd rather do.I’m not interested in making a well-off pastor richer I’d rather give to the poor among us like Jesus taught. If a pastor doesn’t make a wage we should give to them but I’m not in that situation my pastor has plenty.

pastors shouldn’t be made rich they should have what they need and give also to the poor among us themselves when they have plenty.
You know how Paul and then gathered money ? Thy I didn’t keep it they supported the poor churches with the generously of the richer churches. They got what they needed also food and things but it wasn’t like today where they were looking to get richer and store up bank accounts.
So you have Paul who didn’t make any wage but the churches he fed supked his daily needs
“Notwithstanding ye have well done, that ye did communicate with my affliction. Now ye Philippians know also, that in the beginning of the gospel, when I departed from Macedonia, no church communicated with me as concerning giving and receiving, but ye only. For even in Thessalonica ye sent once and again unto my necessity. Not because I desire a gift: but I desire fruit that may abound to your account. But I have all, and abound: I am full, having received of Epaphroditus the things which were sent from you, an odour of a sweet smell, a sacrifice acceptable, wellpleasing to God.”
Philippians 4:14-18 KJV
that wasn’t tommake Paul rich it was to make sure he had what he needed to live and preach the gospel .
Then you have the richer churches goving to help the poorer churches
“Moreover, brethren, we do you to wit of the grace of God bestowed on the churches of Macedonia; how that in a great trial of affliction the abundance of their joy and their deep poverty abounded unto the riches of their liberality.
…..but by an equality, that now at this time your abundance may be a supply for their want, that their abundance also may be a supply for your want: that there may be equality: as it is written, He that had gathered much had nothing over; and he that had gathered little had no lack. But thanks be to God, which put the same earnest care into the heart of Titus for you.”
2 Corinthians 8:1-2, 14-16 KJV
The church is about this principle regarding money and possessions
“And all that believed were together, and had all things common; and sold their possessions and goods, and parted them to all men, as every man had need.”
Acts 2:44-45 KJV
not about making any one person rich but those with plenty helping those with less than enough so all are supplied. That’s at least what I believe. The world today has really misshaped things and a lot of people have wants to be rich themselves but no regard for those who have less than they need
really our worldly means are just a way to keep food on our table and help to keep food and clothes ect in the lives of the needy also. But the world is about making sure we have a lot stored up for our self
Kindly stop attempting to hijack this thread. I will not respond to you further if you can't stay on topic.So wherefrom did you get the forbidden knowledge of good & evil which you have in your heart now?
"The laborer is worthy of his wages" (1 Tim 5:18)
Call it what you want (paycheck, support, supply). The Biblical principle is that they should be generously financially paid because their work is worthy of it.
I'm not sure if you're referring to bi-vocational elders or something else. If someone is truly called to eldership, they should take it seriously and wholly devote themselves to their congregation and be generously financially supplied ("double price").
With all respect, doctrinally, I don't care what you prefer or are interested in or what you'd rather do.
The wages due to the elder depend on his worthiness (Biblical qualification), not his wealth or lack of it.
Did you read my references to 1 Cor 9?
View attachment 237806
1. A Biblically qualified elder is "free from the love of money" (1 Tim 3:3) and uses his finances for God's kingdom (Ps 37:21, Pr 26:21).
2. Riches are a tool that God gives to the wise (Job, Joseph, Abraham, Solomon, Daniel - Prov 19:17)
3. It's no one's business to ascertain how much money anyone else has (2 Thes 3:11, 1 Tim 5:13, 1 Pet 4:15). Each person is responsible for overseeing their own finances, not the finances of others (Matt 25:14-30).
4. God will render and reward to each person according to their deeds (Prov 22:8-9, Rom 2:11, 2 Cor 9:6, Ral 6:5-7)
Please remember that I do not say that tithing is required of you.
"The laborer is worthy of his wages" (1 Tim 5:18)
Call it what you want (paycheck, support, supply). The Biblical principle is that they should be generously financially paid because their work is worthy of it.
I'm not sure if you're referring to bi-vocational elders or something else. If someone is truly called to eldership, they should take it seriously and wholly devote themselves to their congregation and be generously financially supplied ("double price").
With all respect, doctrinally, I don't care what you prefer or are interested in or what you'd rather do.
The wages due to the elder depend on his worthiness (Biblical qualification), not his wealth or lack of it.
Did you read my references to 1 Cor 9?
View attachment 237806
1. A Biblically qualified elder is "free from the love of money" (1 Tim 3:3) and uses his finances for God's kingdom (Ps 37:21, Pr 26:21).
2. Riches are a tool that God gives to the wise (Job, Joseph, Abraham, Solomon, Daniel - Prov 19:17)
3. It's no one's business to ascertain how much money anyone else has (2 Thes 3:11, 1 Tim 5:13, 1 Pet 4:15). Each person is responsible for overseeing their own finances, not the finances of others (Matt 25:14-30).
4. God will render and reward to each person according to their deeds (Prov 22:8-9, Rom 2:11, 2 Cor 9:6, Ral 6:5-7)
Please remember that I do not say that tithing is required of you.
In 1 Timothy 5, Verse 17-25 concerns elders in the church. Verse 17-18, specifically, overlaps with verses 5-18, which concerns finances in the church.I don’t think that is even talking about money when you look at the context
In 1 Timothy 5, Verse 17-25 concerns elders in the church. Verse 17-18, specifically, overlaps with verses 5-18, which concerns finances in the church.
If verse 18 didn't exist, then it could be ambiguous as to what "honor" / "price" refers to in verse 17.
But verse 18 is the reason for verse 17; it is more context that clarifies the purpose of verse 17.
And if you study how Scripture combines these words: "double", "honor/price", "reward/value", etc...they are conveying a financial discussion.
"wages" can also translated "reward', "sum of money", "proceeds", "value", "price". It is a financial word.
Here is an example of how "reward" is still referring to finances (the stuff you trade for other things):
“but each will receive his own reward according to his own labor.” (1 Cor 3:8)
The point is that it is something earned. So it doesn't depend on the elder's current financial status; he is worthy of it because he has worked hard for it. The reason some may have a hard time comprehending a pastor's paycheck is that we assume it will be spent on self-indulgent things not related to paying rent, food, gas, etc. Paul says a proper amount to provide an elder with is "double". That can mean double what he needs, double what you would pay someone else in the church, etc. I'll let you make your own conclusion about that. But without dispute, it is an ample supply for their honorable work. And yes, it is hard work.
Ready the previous 9 verses, you'll see a context of finances.yeah I prefer to just read it on context
He quotes 2 Scriptures to clarify the reason for verse 17. This quote about not muzzling the ox is to show how elders should be comfortable rather than burdened if they serve your congregation.Paul’s quoting from the ot to support his point see ?
“Thou shalt not muzzle the ox when he treadeth out the corn.”
Deuteronomy 25:4 KJV
I believe a lot depends on the ministers' motivation. Do they really work for the Lord or for the loot.Ready the previous 9 verses, you'll see a context of finances.
He quotes 2 Scriptures to clarify the reason for verse 17. This quote about not muzzling the ox is to show how elders should be comfortable rather than burdened if they serve your congregation.
The other Scripture he quotes is "the laborer is worthy of his wages", which I have explained is a financial term, and speaks of something earned.
“The elders who rule well are to be considered worthy of double honor, especially those who work hard at preaching and teaching. For the Scripture says, “you shall not muzzle the ox while he is threshing,” and “The laborer is worthy of his wages.”” (1 Tim 5:17–18)
To not pay a worthy elder is to muzzle him while he works, creating more burden for him. He labors in his pastoral work and is worthy of his wages.
Good day Sir
Ready the previous 9 verses, you'll see a context of finances.
He quotes 2 Scriptures to clarify the reason for verse 17. This quote about not muzzling the ox is to show how elders should be comfortable rather than burdened if they serve your congregation.
The other Scripture he quotes is "the laborer is worthy of his wages", which I have explained is a financial term, and speaks of something earned.
“The elders who rule well are to be considered worthy of double honor, especially those who work hard at preaching and teaching. For the Scripture says, “you shall not muzzle the ox while he is threshing,” and “The laborer is worthy of his wages.”” (1 Tim 5:17–18)
To not pay a worthy elder is to muzzle him while he works, creating more burden for him. He labors in his pastoral work and is worthy of his wages.
Good day Sir