We are saved by grace through faith, not by water.. 
The language is archaic. Didn't THOU knowest that?
Actually, I have NO IDEA why you guys don't understand. The Word is clear enough.
There is victory only in the truth. May you see it some day.
I've already proven that as well, from Acts 10:43. And the remission of sins is by FAITH in Christ, NOT water baptism.
Acts 2:38 was a special circumstance.
You have not refuted that.And you are right. Because the phrase "when ONLY baptism was available" is a bogus claim. You haven't proven that, and I have refuted that.
The water saved Noah and his family from the wicked people of the world that was deluged in wiping them all out.right
which is why you titled it SAVED BY WATER
you try staying afloat in hundreds of feet of water during a violent storm for 40 days and nights without food, sleep or anything to cling to and then come back (you won't. you will drown but whatever, it's your spin) and then come back and tell us all how water saved you
the ark saved Noah and his family. the water, drowned everyone and everything else that was not on the ark
you really have absolutely no clue whatsoever
Actually it is the symbol that is provided by the water that washes away sins...in that we identify accurately with the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus when we go under and then come up out of the water.didn't save and does not save now
if you are depending on water to wash away your sins, you are still IN them
We are saved by grace through faith, not by water..![]()
The Bible does that with several different subjects: sanctification, inheritance, death, etc.So, positional sanctification is "justification"; and should be described using that word in holy scripture. No need to confuse things by using two words to describe the same thing.
Give some examples of this.The Bible does that with several different subjects: sanctification, inheritance, death, etc.
What in the world are you talking about??? "sleep mode". Huh??However, you were being rude when you went into sleep mode; and love is not rude (1 Corinthians 13:5 (RSV)).
Wrong again. His experience is exactly what the NT church experiences.Cornelius, again, was part of a transition from Jew to Gentile in the church and I have already explained how that makes him an exception to the rule. So, your argument falls apart.
Totally backwards again.Cornelius was an exception to the rule; the rule being found in Acts 2:38-39.
All of you guys are just very confused.My views are similar to @Wansvic's but not exactly the same. I believe that baptism has the power to save but that salvation may be possible apart from it; but I think that @Wansvic takes the hard line and says that one can only be saved by being baptized in Jesus' Name.
Cornelius was an exception to the rule; the rule being found in Acts 2:38-39; in which case repentance, belief, and baptism come before receiving the Holy Ghost.
Go ahead and think that being totally dishonest is funny. That's on you.Yes, you are basically in DENIAL of the truth (because my views are the truth; whether you want to believe that or not).
I thought it was funny.
Exactly! Very good.I learned that the practical kind of sanctification is being saved from the power of sin.
Justification being saved from the penalty of sin.
Glorification being saved from the presence of sin.
Not following your point. The point in Matt 7:21-23 is that this crowd expected to get into the kingdom on the basis of what THEY DID for Jesus. There was NO mention of their having faith in Him for what He did FOR THEM.I would also point out what it says in Matthew 13:41-42 and Matthew 7:23....that workers / doers of iniquity will be cast away into the furnace of fire.
That would indicate that sanctification is a requirement for being ultimately justified.
Oh, yeah. Cop-out again.The passage has been addressed now, twice by me...
I don't reject "pure doctrine". I do repeatedly reject your ideas, opinions, assumptions, presumptions and speculations.That is no excuse for rejecting the purest form of doctrine that is found in the kjv.
When are you going to get tired of being repeatedly REFUTED??Cornelius was an exception to the rule; which is found in Acts 2:38-39.
Cornelius' experience is EXACTLY THE SAME as found in Gal 3:2,5. Read your Bible.God proved that Gentiles could be given the gift of the Holy Ghost and forced the issue thereby; so that those who were opposed would not be able to even protest the new development.
Well, I guess one would have to actually read my posts to know that I have.You have not refuted that.