It's not the same word. It's not used in bible and it doesn't mean a physical departure.
In red is part of Winers you ALWAYS leave out:
In red is part of Winers you ALWAYS leave out:
quoting old post (Post #3318) -
^ EDIT to add: Here's what I put in a Post #32 of a different thread back in September (from "Winer's Grammar"):
Post #32 - https://christianchat.com/threads/the-falling-away-is-this-the-rapture.201579/post-4660657
[quoting]
"A Treatise on the Grammar of New Testament: Regarded as a Sure Basis" by George Benedikt Winer (pgs 24-25):
"d) Many words which had long been in use received a new form or pronunciation by which the older was in most cases superceded: as [...] apostasia (apostasis, Lob. p. 528), [...]"
[found on pgs 24-25 (of Winer's)]
-- https://books.google.com/books?id=i7kC8UOe-4cC&pg=PA24&source=gbs_toc_r&cad=3#v=onepage&q&f=true
[end quoting from source; underline mine; note for readers: the "[...]" is a "snip" of the LONG LIST OF WORDS]
____________
The word we are discussing is in his long LIST of words which fall under the category he is describing in that quote, above ^ .
[end quoting Post #3318 (pg 166) - https://christianchat.com/threads/h...ular-in-the-modern-church.201091/post-4707866 ]
____________
That's exactly what he's saying.
That it is the same word, just like Liddell and Scott's says (of it), "LATER FORM FOR apostasis".