Yeah, it's hard to show evidence when, say, doctors that have treated and cured using ivermectin are fired for not kowtowing to the narrative. Hard to show evidence when said evidence is blocked from every angle. The little we're able to find and share is basically a miracle in this day and age of big tech/media controlling the narrative.
Look up how many companies and media outlets have been "brought to you by Pfizer" aka "paid off by Pfizer" and then tell me if you really think both sides are being given a fair shake in the info department.
Ok...
But the biological chemistry of invermectin doesn't work. It has no logical path to do so.
You are talking about a molecule the proverbial sizes of a beach ball trying to destroy a marble...
Do you know the biological mechanism by which it actually works? Nobody else can...and I do mean nobody.
Invermectin is not a small molecule...
Invermectin is not an antiviral or antibody producing chemical. Yes, they both share zinc...but that really doesn't do anything to stop infection or reduce disease over and above a placebo.
And no one has provided any scientific proof otherwise. It's been tested by reputable double blind trials...and failed miserably...
It doesn't work!
Monoclonal antibodies work.
Steroids work
Antivirals work.