It is a required step in the sin cleansing process...clearly illustrated by scriptures.
?? - Still can't answer simple questions.
It is a required step in the sin cleansing process...clearly illustrated by scriptures.
Keeping it together the way it is presented to us by God....is the proper context. The requirement of water baptism is part of it.
?? - Still can't answer simple questions.
Again, the Holy Ghost is absolutely promised to those who will be water-baptized in Jesus' Name.Pure speculation. To assume these kinds of thoughts seems unrealistic.
What is the context of the Entire Bible? Water baptism? Can we really interpret Scripture through the lens of water baptism?
To properly interpret the Bible, we MUST understand it's core doctrine . . . and it surely isn't physical water.
Keep telling yourself that.j1 Pet 3:21 isn't about literal water, but what literal water SYMBOLIZES, which is the baptism (by the Holy Sprit) that does save.
Again, the Holy Ghost is absolutely promised to those who will be water-baptized in Jesus' Name.
It may not be the core doctrine in holy scripture; but it is a core doctrine.
Those who receive this water baptism will be more equipped to minister to those around them because they will have received the baptism of the Holy Ghost as the result of receiving water-baptism in Jesus' Name (Acts 2:38-39).
I am uncertain why it is that certain pastors insist on baptizing in titles when the scripture is clear that
1) water baptism doth also now save us (1 Peter 3:20-21); and,
2) there is none other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved, other than the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth (Acts 4:10-12).
Seeing that these two things are true, it should be clear that baptism in titles will not save but that water baptism in the Name will in fact save.
For remission of sins and the Holy Ghost are absolutely promised as the result of receiving baptism in Jesus' Name.
And there is no such promise given concerning being baptized in titles.
Since having the Holy Ghost = salvation (Romans 8:9), I conclude that a person can absolutely secure salvation by receiving baptism in Jesus' Name; since the Holy Ghost is absolutely promised to all those who receive this ordinance.
Those who receive baptism in titles have no such promise of the Holy Ghost.
And even if the Holy Ghost wasn't = to salvation, it might be expedient to receive it anyway; since one can receive power for ministry if or when they receive the Holy Ghost.
Act 1:8, But ye shall receive power, after that the Holy Ghost is come upon you: and ye shall be witnesses unto me both in Jerusalem, and in all Judaea, and in Samaria, and unto the uttermost part of the earth.
I'm sorry, JBF, but I ran out of steam on this topic. I just don't have the energy to go round and round without the ability to resolve anything. I want Peace in my life, and I find that these kinds of discussions don't edify [me] in any way. Instead, I seem to end up with a small sense of suffering and grief, which is not what I would want for anyone. The last reason for my being "here" is to enter into fruitless discussions that only confuse our readers. I don't want to do that.
I'm walking away from this thread. Take care, and may the Lord grant you the most incredible of Blessing. I sincerely mean that.,
I would only say to you that if you have not yet received baptism in Jesus' Name and are given the opportunity in the future,
Don't pass up the opportunity.
LOL - I received water baptism and promptly walked down to the Seven-11 store, hair still wet, and stole a bag of rubber bands for my paper route. From there, my life went from bad to insanely worse. Water baptism just got me wet.
However, Baptism of the Holy Spirit happened to me in the middle of the Arizona desert, and since that day, my life has been on an upward climb in obedience.
It was that day that my heart was Spiritually Circumcised by Christ; I was Powerfully Indwelt by the Holy Spirit to the degree that if I had felt more of His Power, my physical body would have been altered. The Power I felt was not of this physical world.
I don't know what else to tell you . . . and I'm sorry to say this, but you don't listen to me. So . . . I wish you the very best of luck and that the Lord would grant you the exact same Blessing that He has granted to me.
I denied the Lord at one point and I believe that my baptism was a more powerful confession than was my denial of Him.
Scary.
As for your advice, none of it makes any sense to me.
It was scary for me too; but seeing as Jesus restored Peter after he had denied Him three times, I did not see it as beyond the realm of possibility that He might restore me also through a more absolute confession of Jesus as Lord...in identifying with Him in His death, burial, and resurrection through baptism in the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth for the remission of sins.
Hebrews 6:4-6 NIV - "It is impossible for those who have once been enlightened, who have tasted the heavenly gift, who have shared in the Holy Spirit, who have tasted the goodness of the word of God and the powers of the coming age and who have fallen away, to be brought back to repentance. To their loss they are crucifying the Son of God all over again and subjecting him to public disgrace."
That's what I was referring to also.That's not what I was referring to. I was referring to your denial of Jesus.
It was scary for me too; but seeing as Jesus restored Peter after he had denied Him three times, I did not see it as beyond the realm of possibility that He might restore me also through a more absolute confession of Jesus as Lord...in identifying with Him in His death, burial, and resurrection through baptism in the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth for the remission of sins.
Yes. Peter was a total pain in the neck. And then he pulls his stunts again in Galatians chapter 2. And Paul? I would have done exactly to Peter as he did . . . chew him out in front of everyone and then walk away. It is curious as to why we never read of Paul interacting with Peter again . . . which would be my feelings, too.
So, all I did was say that your denial of Christ is scary, and then we have it . . . off on a whole new tangent.
May I ask you this . . . why are you here? Are you here to learn or be the Bible Police?
What do you think of Peter's 1st and 2nd epistles?Yes. Peter was a total pain in the neck. And then he pulls his stunts again in Galatians chapter 2. And Paul? I would have done exactly to Peter as he did . . . chew him out in front of everyone and then walk away. It is curious as to why we never read of Paul interacting with Peter again . . . which would be my feelings, too.
So, all I did was say that your denial of Christ is scary, and then we have it . . . off on a whole new tangent.
May I ask you this . . . why are you here? Are you here to learn or be the Bible Police?